Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2019, 08:38 AM
 
8,005 posts, read 7,250,724 times
Reputation: 18175

Advertisements

I've wondered many times if there were any questionable trades related to the President's tweets or announcement like the one in August at the G7 about the phone call with China “China called last night our top trade people and said, ‘Let’s get back to the table.’ So we will be getting back to the table and I think they want to do something,” That one turned out to be a complete fabrication intended to move the market. Vanity Fair did a piece about unknown traders taking advantage of the seemingly random announcements. From that article:

In the last 10 minutes of trading at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange on Friday, September 13, someone got very lucky. That’s when he or she, or a group of people, sold short 120,000 “S&P e-minis”—electronically traded futures contracts linked to the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index—when the index was trading around 3010. The time was 3:50 p.m. in New York; it was nearing midnight in Tehran. A few hours later, drones attacked a large swath of Saudi Arabia’s oil infrastructure, choking off production in the country and sending oil prices soaring. By the time the CME next opened, for pretrading on Sunday night, the S&P index had fallen 30 points, giving that very fortunate trader, or traders, a quick $180 million profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2019, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Florida
6,634 posts, read 7,367,380 times
Reputation: 8192
Probably the same people that trade on any news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2019, 09:24 AM
 
8,005 posts, read 7,250,724 times
Reputation: 18175
Yep. Just regular traders buying over half the days volume in S&P minis ten minutes before close on multiple days before major market moving events. We could all have done it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2019, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Sweet Home Chicago!
6,721 posts, read 6,506,173 times
Reputation: 9915
I've done pretty well buying on the dips. The underlying economy is strong so every time there's an event/tweet or whatever that causes irrational panic, I buy more.

I'm not brave enough to sell short or try triple leveraged plays though.

Last edited by flamadiddle; 10-17-2019 at 11:48 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2019, 01:10 PM
 
Location: moved
13,675 posts, read 9,754,531 times
Reputation: 23533
One conjecture is that at any given moment, for any given reason, somebody out-there is buying/selling a particular thing, or option on that thing. News happens, shares rise or fall. Half of the traders win, and half lose. Who writes the subsequent narrative? How often do we hear about the traders who anticipated some event, but said event never transpired? Or who got blindsided?

It is not impossible, especially in the present political climate, that certain individuals receive warning of impending political decisions, and take trading-action accordingly. It remains to be proven, however, that actual market action follows anticipation. "Insider knowledge" may to turn to be wrong, or even if right, it is only transient.

I regard such insider-trading, if it exists, as a form of taxation on the rest of us. It's a burden and a ballast. But is it large? These insiders, who purportedly are making hundreds of billions, probably are not making trillions. What does gain or lose trillions, is mass-reactions, and these reactions feed on themselves.

Here's hoping for placid and well-mannered markets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2019, 03:36 PM
 
2,755 posts, read 1,792,716 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1insider View Post
I've wondered many times if there were any questionable trades related to the President's tweets or announcement like the one in August at the G7 about the phone call with China “China called last night our top trade people and said, ‘Let’s get back to the table.’ So we will be getting back to the table and I think they want to do something,” That one turned out to be a complete fabrication intended to move the market. Vanity Fair did a piece about unknown traders taking advantage of the seemingly random announcements. From that article:

In the last 10 minutes of trading at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange on Friday, September 13, someone got very lucky. That’s when he or she, or a group of people, sold short 120,000 “S&P e-minis”—electronically traded futures contracts linked to the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index—when the index was trading around 3010. The time was 3:50 p.m. in New York; it was nearing midnight in Tehran. A few hours later, drones attacked a large swath of Saudi Arabia’s oil infrastructure, choking off production in the country and sending oil prices soaring. By the time the CME next opened, for pretrading on Sunday night, the S&P index had fallen 30 points, giving that very fortunate trader, or traders, a quick $180 million profit.
Odd that a story about "Trump Chaos Trades" opens up with an example that had nothing to do with Trump.

Author happens to be on CNBC now and doesn't seem to know his subject matter as well as I would have thought he would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2019, 03:38 PM
 
4,985 posts, read 3,979,673 times
Reputation: 10147
"Who is profiting from the President's unpredictability?"
apparently, just about everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2019, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,088 posts, read 7,562,936 times
Reputation: 9835
I keep losing in my trading accounts, nuf said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2019, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,575,158 times
Reputation: 38578
His friends, including Putin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 07:48 AM
 
31,689 posts, read 41,094,606 times
Reputation: 14434
Anyone who gets alerted to what he is going to tweet or do beforehand that will have a market impact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top