Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-24-2008, 03:23 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,924,275 times
Reputation: 25342

Advertisements

when we get our portfolio info quarterly from our advisor and also from Fidelity where the funds are held---they always have different info--
sometimes what I want to know is not there and I try to find it using Internet sources but sometimes can't...

what is the optimum breakdown for a portfolio so that you know how profitable it really is and when your advisor is losing his/her touch as far as picking which fund/ETF/REIT to go with....
I would like to know how each mutual/bond fund, REIT, ETF stacks up against others in its own sector--for the quarter and the year and a trailing avg...
how well that sector has done against other sectors and against the Dow in general---

does that make sense--we don't have individual stocks--just funds

I think our advisor is just not good at picking better funds (not saying he has to have the top performing every quarter) but I think they should be in the top quarter of their sector...is that too much to ask...

market is too volitile to hang with a sector that is non-performing for too long...it is too hard to make up lost value...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2008, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Aloverton
6,560 posts, read 14,470,537 times
Reputation: 10165
How much is your advisor charging for this advice?

I answer it that way, because with no offense intended, most of your questions aren't fully coherent enough for me to know what precise question you're posing and give a precise answer.

What is clear, though, is that you're concerned that your advisor isn't picking the best funds. Depending on the advisor, I would also be concerned that s/he is picking load funds, which are in my view lousy investments 98% of the time and mediocre ones 2% of the time.

If you are at Fidelity you can easily do some mutual fund research and see what are the top performers in a given category. Be sure, however, to rule out funds with minimums far higher than you could reach, and to otherwise as much as possible compare apples to apples--in other words, match as closely as possible the sector and risk objective of the funds you're in. You can then sort this list by performance over a given period, and see where your funds stack up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 06:47 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,924,275 times
Reputation: 25342
we are in no-load mutual funds--some of them are the DFA funds--about as low cost as you can get --but we have been in them only since about March...the funds we were in before then were more varied and some were loads and some no loads...

now we also have a Spartan International Index and Spartan Total Market index--but we have DFA funds in those areas too
I just think he is doubling up on some sectors vs having more diversification---
and I would like to see the rolling avg for these funds and their rank against others in their sectors--

a fund that has a load of say under 1% is worth it if you get better than avg results...
Canada fund has done spectacularly in the past 3-5-10 yr cycle--even if it has dropped some this year due to general downturn in market overall
that is something I would prefer based on past performance vs a mediocre general foreign fund...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Aloverton
6,560 posts, read 14,470,537 times
Reputation: 10165
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
a fund that has a load of say under 1% is worth it if you get better than avg results...
Canada fund has done spectacularly in the past 3-5-10 yr cycle--even if it has dropped some this year due to general downturn in market overall
that is something I would prefer based on past performance vs a mediocre general foreign fund...

I have never seen a fund with a load under 1%. The definition of a load is a sales charge imposed by the fund itself against the investor, regardless of any fee levied by the broker, either for buying or redemption or both. I have seen funds where the minimum purchase at this or that broker led to a transaction fee of 1% or more, but only as a flat fee. I believe you are thinking of expense ratios or transaction fees.

Can you tell me of a fund with a load of less than 1%? Maybe they exist, and if so I'm curious to see who does this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2008, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Bayside, NY
823 posts, read 3,690,415 times
Reputation: 401
If you go to Morningstar.com you can enter your fund's symbol in the top left hand corner and get it's results against the fund's benchmark and category. When you click on Total Return in the left hand menu it gives you the same info broken down even finer.

If you drop a sector when it's not doing well you are losing money and will not be able to take advantage when that sector makes it's comeback. If you have set up your asset allocation it should be for the long haul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2008, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Kailua, Oahu, HI and San Diego, CA
1,178 posts, read 5,945,075 times
Reputation: 803
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
when we get our portfolio info quarterly from our advisor and also from Fidelity where the funds are held---they always have different info--
sometimes what I want to know is not there and I try to find it using Internet sources but sometimes can't...

what is the optimum breakdown for a portfolio so that you know how profitable it really is and when your advisor is losing his/her touch as far as picking which fund/ETF/REIT to go with....
I would like to know how each mutual/bond fund, REIT, ETF stacks up against others in its own sector--for the quarter and the year and a trailing avg...
how well that sector has done against other sectors and against the Dow in general---

does that make sense--we don't have individual stocks--just funds

I think our advisor is just not good at picking better funds (not saying he has to have the top performing every quarter) but I think they should be in the top quarter of their sector...is that too much to ask...

market is too volitile to hang with a sector that is non-performing for too long...it is too hard to make up lost value...
Here is a place you can bookmark, and check each fund by putting it's symbol into the "Get Basic chart(s) for" box, and clicking go.

FBIOX: Basic Chart for FIDELITY SELECT BIOTECHNOLOGY P - Yahoo! Finance (http://tinyurl.com/64muu2 - broken link)

This compares the fund against the S&P 500 in percentage terms, and can be viewed over a variety of time frames (3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and as long as the fund has been in existance). For some funds or stocks, you can look at a week or a day.

Here is a place where you can sort ETF performance by Name, symbol, or performance over any period (to compare to the market, look at SPY):

ETF Performance

Hank

Here is a list of Fidelity Sector funds, their Fidelity number, and their symbols:

SELECT (ALL) SYMBOL
AIR TRANS (034) FSAIX
AM GOLD (041) FSAGX
AUTOMOTIVE (502) FSAVX
BIOTECH 042 FBIOX
BRKGE&INV MGMT 068FSLBX
BUS SVC(353)&OUTSOFBSOX
CHEMICALS 069 FSCHX
COMPUTERS (007) FDCPX
CONST&HOUSING 511 FSHOX
CONSUMER PROD 517 FSCPX
CYCLICAL (515) FCYIX
DEF&AEROSPACE 067 FSDAX
DEV COMM 518 FSDCX
ELEX 008 (SEMICONDFSELX
ENERGY 060 FSENX
ENERGY SVCS 043 FSESX
ENVIRON SVCS 516 FSLEX
FINANCIAL SER (066FIDSX
FOOD & AGRIC 009 FDFAX
HEALTH (063) FSPHX
HOME FIN (098) FSVLX
INDUST EQUIP 510 FSCGX
INDUST MATLS 509 FSDPX
INSURANCE 045 FSPCX
LEISURE 062 FDLSX
MEDICAL DELIV 505 FSHCX
MED EQUIP(354) FSMEX
MULTIMED(BCST) 503FBMPX
NATURAL GAS 513 FSNGX
NATL RES (514) FNARX
NETWORKING(912) FNINX
PAPER&FOR PROD 506FSPFX
PHARMACEUTICALS(58FPHAX
REGIONAL BNKS (507FSRBX
RETAILING 046 FSRPX
SOFTWARE 028 FSCSX
TECHNOLOGY 064 FSPTX
TELECOMM 096 FSTCX
TRANSPORTATION 512FSRFX
UTILITIES 065 FSUTX
WIRELESS (963) FWRLX
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 07:59 PM
 
1,325 posts, read 2,368,035 times
Reputation: 1062
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
when we get our portfolio info quarterly from our advisor and also from Fidelity where the funds are held---they always have different info--
sometimes what I want to know is not there and I try to find it using Internet sources but sometimes can't...

what is the optimum breakdown for a portfolio so that you know how profitable it really is and when your advisor is losing his/her touch as far as picking which fund/ETF/REIT to go with....
I would like to know how each mutual/bond fund, REIT, ETF stacks up against others in its own sector--for the quarter and the year and a trailing avg...
how well that sector has done against other sectors and against the Dow in general---

does that make sense--we don't have individual stocks--just funds

I think our advisor is just not good at picking better funds (not saying he has to have the top performing every quarter) but I think they should be in the top quarter of their sector...is that too much to ask...

market is too volitile to hang with a sector that is non-performing for too long...it is too hard to make up lost value...
For Mutual Funds and ETF's, here is what i do
1) Go to finance.yahoo.com and enter the ticker symbol
2) Click "Performance" on the left hand side. Scroll down to trailing returns, and you can compare the fund with Index, and Category.
3) Click "Profile" and scroll down to expenses. Here you can compare how much you are paying in load fees,expenses, etc against the category

Just be careful that your advisor isn't just picking funds based on short term performance. Its likely those will be outperformed by an index (fund) over the long term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top