Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-10-2015, 08:45 PM
 
2,919 posts, read 5,808,209 times
Reputation: 2801

Advertisements

Leaving Los Angeles - Los Angeles Magazine

Great read. Very insightful... Its a shame that all of the "GOOD" cities are pricing out people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:04 PM
 
Location: West Hollywood
3,190 posts, read 3,186,992 times
Reputation: 5262
As long as a city holds broad appeal it's going to be expensive. Every major US city is very expensive. Some more than others, obviously, but every mid-sized city that's seen as an alternative to pricier cities like NYC, San Fran and LA are quickly becoming as expensive as their larger, busier counterparts. Portland and Austin are prime examples. The real estate markets in Portland and Austin are booming at an unreasonable rate because the idea that it's so much cheaper there is still prevalent.
And there's really not much that can be done about this. The rural communities, far removed from big cities, hold less and less appeal to Americans(for very practical reasons) so the cities are becoming more crowded. A lot of Angelenos seem to think the solution to the real estate nightmare is to simply build up, adding more apartments and condos. But more apartments and condos means more people, which means more strain on an already over-taxed an outdated infrastructure. Repairing existing infrastructure only gets the job partway done. To accommodate more people we would need more freeways and public transit, meaning less buildable land for developments and fewer desirable areas for buyers/renters.

It's a complex problem that extends far beyond "It's expensive. Make it cheaper."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles>Little Rock>Houston>Little Rock
6,489 posts, read 8,819,005 times
Reputation: 17514
That is sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Milwaukee, WI
3,368 posts, read 2,894,423 times
Reputation: 2972
Quote:
Originally Posted by maggie2101 View Post
That is sad.
Not really, it's called Capitalism and Democracy, and also Freedom to move. Believe me, you wouldn't want to live in society where you aren't free to move anywhere and price is controlled by government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:26 PM
 
Location: La La Land
1,616 posts, read 2,491,518 times
Reputation: 2839
Quote:
Originally Posted by brrabbit View Post
Not really, it's called Capitalism and Democracy, and also Freedom to move. Believe me, you wouldn't want to live in society where you aren't free to move anywhere and price is controlled by government.
Oh my goodness, yes. It is so much better to live in an oligarchy where you can't afford to move anywhere and price is controlled by dishonest banks selling out to foreign investors. Yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
1,235 posts, read 1,770,568 times
Reputation: 1558
Yes, interesting article. Waxes a bit nostalgic for the "golden years" of the late 90's when the economy was humming along and real estate was cheaper, relatively speaking.

I am struck by the author's profession (journalism) and his circle of friends, many of whom are/were artists or college professors. Those are tough professions in which to find sustainable employment, even in more affordable cities. Of course, journalism (esp. print) has been dealt a body blow over the past 10 years or so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
1,235 posts, read 1,770,568 times
Reputation: 1558
I found this in the comments section to the linked article.

"I'm a New Yorker who loves Los Angeles (don't let the cliche fool you; there are more of us than you think). it's always a treat to visit, whether it's for work, or to hang with old friends.

Though NYC is my home, I've always understood the allure of LA, and sympathize with the author's reticence to leave it behind. And though his angst is centered around Los Angeles, the hardships he faces are faced by middle class folks in many of the country's more desirable cities (I hesitate to use the word desirable, as that's such a subjective term). NYC, SF, Seattle, Boston, San Diego, Austin - all these cities, and likely many more, are undergoing a transformation that renders them too expensive for most people. In some cases, these cities experienced a reverse "white flight" through gentrification, and now even the gentrifiers are being displaced. The article is beautifully written, but the phenomenon is national, not local.

Is it a problem to be solved through policy? I don't know. My guess is that we're entering a phase wherein our more desirable cities become gilded enclaves optimized for the rich, surrounded by enclaves for their servant classes. Anyone who knows NYC well knows that it's at least halfway to reaching that dubious goal - from the author's description, it sounds like LA is headed in that direction too. It's a symptom of 21st century capitalism - probably less pronounced in "the heartland," and perhaps an endorsement of that part of the country. How to address it? Frankly, I've lost faith in bureaucrats or technocrats, so I imagine it'll simply have to play itself out."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:44 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,746 posts, read 26,834,489 times
Reputation: 24800
PhoenixMike posted the link to this article on the other "leaving L.A." thread....

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixmike11 View Post
Leaving Los Angeles - Los Angeles Magazine

There was a good article about this in LA magazine (people leaving LA due to the high cost of living)
like a lot of people I like LA- but it is a very expensive place to live and making there without a high paying job is not easy
...and I have the same response after reading it. That really is a depressing article. Starting out in one's late 20s here and going on to do that well so young in life, it would be particularly devastating to endure what this couple did. Especially if this is not where you grew up and you have no other ties to this city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:52 PM
 
Location: La La Land
1,616 posts, read 2,491,518 times
Reputation: 2839
Quote:
Originally Posted by StreetLegal View Post
I found this in the comments section to the linked article.

"I'm a New Yorker who loves Los Angeles (don't let the cliche fool you; there are more of us than you think). it's always a treat to visit, whether it's for work, or to hang with old friends.

Though NYC is my home, I've always understood the allure of LA, and sympathize with the author's reticence to leave it behind. And though his angst is centered around Los Angeles, the hardships he faces are faced by middle class folks in many of the country's more desirable cities (I hesitate to use the word desirable, as that's such a subjective term). NYC, SF, Seattle, Boston, San Diego, Austin - all these cities, and likely many more, are undergoing a transformation that renders them too expensive for most people. In some cases, these cities experienced a reverse "white flight" through gentrification, and now even the gentrifiers are being displaced. The article is beautifully written, but the phenomenon is national, not local.

Is it a problem to be solved through policy? I don't know. My guess is that we're entering a phase wherein our more desirable cities become gilded enclaves optimized for the rich, surrounded by enclaves for their servant classes. Anyone who knows NYC well knows that it's at least halfway to reaching that dubious goal - from the author's description, it sounds like LA is headed in that direction too. It's a symptom of 21st century capitalism - probably less pronounced in "the heartland," and perhaps an endorsement of that part of the country. How to address it? Frankly, I've lost faith in bureaucrats or technocrats, so I imagine it'll simply have to play itself out."
StreetLegal you beat me by a few minutes. As NYC natives planning a move to LA in the near future we have witnessed exactly the same phenomenon occur here. It is a function of the concentration of wealth in a few greedy hands who are manipulating real estate markets.

The big difference is, as someone suggested in another comment, that urban areas are becoming less family friendly. That seems inevitable and whether it is a positive or a negative remains a matter of personal perspective.

Since we are childless and not seeking to become home owners (why would owning a "spread" be something you would seek in an urban area?) the change seems a positive one to us. While rent may involve an increase, utility costs alone will decrease enough to help blunt the difference. In addition, the ability to enjoy the outdoors 12 months a year, buy a subscription to a local playhouse for a couple of hundred a year, or enjoy a blooming culinary experience on a budget (think food trucks), makes a big difference from enduring sleet and ice, $200 Broadway tickets, etc.

Housing expenses are undeniably increasing nationally, but people have to accept that you cannot live everywhere and anywhere if your goals involve home ownership and raising children.

P.S. Not allowed to rep you so I'm doing it here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:58 PM
 
337 posts, read 406,049 times
Reputation: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by westcoastbabe View Post
Leaving Los Angeles - Los Angeles Magazine

Great read. Very insightful... Its a shame that all of the "GOOD" cities are pricing out people.
Yup...soon he will be forced to live with all the rednecks in Birmingham, Alabama.

Ooh boy will those rednecks eat the city slickers alive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top