Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-08-2007, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,614,054 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

LANSING -- Michigan policymakers edged closer to the brink of the unthinkable this week, as paralysis in the debate over how to address the state's looming $1.8-billion deficit for the 2007-08 budget year raised the specter of a partial shutdown of state government if no deal is reached by Oct. 1.

Talks to resolve the budget stalemate broke down in a flurry of finger-pointing Thursday night, leaving Gov. Jennifer Granholm and lawmakers stumbling toward the deadline without a plan to pay for an array of government services.

State edges closer to a government shutdown
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2007, 09:04 PM
 
Location: Northen Indiana
59 posts, read 259,051 times
Reputation: 59
Good idea; shut-er down! That's the good type of management we vote for. What does that mean?

I have some recomendations: First, close schools. I'm sick of the "For the Children" type jargon to jack my taxes. Second, turn off the water.... Really, I wish they would take a look at what those billions are going out for. Is the money really going for a person's education or a multimillion dollar reception hall and a two million dollar football stadium at every high school? Are they paying businesses to stay? Are they over-paying for road construction year after year yet keeping truck weights 50% higher than allother states?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2007, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Michigan
265 posts, read 814,262 times
Reputation: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowWalk View Post
Good idea; shut-er down! That's the good type of management we vote for. What does that mean?

I have some recomendations: First, close schools. I'm sick of the "For the Children" type jargon to jack my taxes. Second, turn off the water.... Really, I wish they would take a look at what those billions are going out for. Is the money really going for a person's education or a multimillion dollar reception hall and a two million dollar football stadium at every high school? Are they paying businesses to stay? Are they over-paying for road construction year after year yet keeping truck weights 50% higher than allother states?
How about rescinding that COLA raise for state workers? They are slated to get a raise on wages that are on average, 18-21 bucks an hour....what do the rest of us get...a tax increase! And why is the Dept. of Human Services choosing this time of economic peril to switch over to a new software for its payments workers, and paying to retrain all of them as well. Who foots the bill for that? Yep, you guessed it...Joe taxpayer!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2007, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Worthington, OH
693 posts, read 2,258,661 times
Reputation: 298
Default Lansing: No thought about residents

While 1.8 billion dollars is a large number of money, it can be argued about for months on how to cut the deficit. I strongly feel the state needs to think about the public first, and not the sheer exercise of trimming services that strapped residents already have a heavy reliance on. When a government can consider cutting funding to an education system that already falls behind most of the country, the thought of the public is already gone....sheer numbers. Not only do we have some of the worst high-school graduation rates in the country, we continue to loose enrollment of our students. Shutting down partial services will do nothing to help the general public in this state, it will create a bandage that will in turn be torn off by the next policy maker, leaving another hole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2007, 08:06 AM
 
Location: SE Michigan
262 posts, read 788,374 times
Reputation: 90
Thumbs up Way to go Jenny!!

It's funny how when these type of posts are put up some people avoid them, they don't want to hear that the Governor or State Reps are the people who need to take PAY CUTS, Because I feel most of them Voted for these noodle heads in the first place, because that person said what the Voter wanted to hear, Higher Education, more High Tech jobs, and the list goes on. the thing is they haven't done a thing to make it happen. Just a lot of LIP SERVICE. I would like to know when the Governor is going to put Her Plan into effect? What in Her last year so we can't do anything to turn us around? Or no wait She said we would be BLOWN AWAY in Her fifth year. Now I know why we are going down like we are, Big THANKS TO Jenny!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2007, 10:39 AM
 
1 posts, read 2,304 times
Reputation: 11
Angry to all "hate the state worker" people out there

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southernkomfort27 View Post
How about rescinding that COLA raise for state workers? They are slated to get a raise on wages that are on average, 18-21 bucks an hour....what do the rest of us get...a tax increase! And why is the Dept. of Human Services choosing this time of economic peril to switch over to a new software for its payments workers, and paying to retrain all of them as well. Who foots the bill for that? Yep, you guessed it...Joe taxpayer!

I work for the state government, we "regular" state workers have a double whammy with this stupid state budget issue: we lose our pay for who knows how long, AND we will be paying the SAME high taxes as you...we are ALL "joe taxpayers"...why do you think state workers are any different?

disgusted with the "hate the state worker" attitude
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2007, 12:40 PM
 
7,357 posts, read 11,767,296 times
Reputation: 8944
What do they even mean by a partial shutdown? How partial? They're muttering about closing the reform school entirely, which BTW is the only long-term care facility left in the state for violent mentally-ill adolescents. Maybe close the prisons and let John Norman Collins and Leslie Allen Williams run free? No more Medicaid? No more Child Protective Services? What are we giving up?

I cannot believe it is this hard to run the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2007, 02:37 PM
 
106 posts, read 536,013 times
Reputation: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sociologist View Post
While 1.8 billion dollars is a large number of money, it can be argued about for months on how to cut the deficit. I strongly feel the state needs to think about the public first, and not the sheer exercise of trimming services that strapped residents already have a heavy reliance on. When a government can consider cutting funding to an education system that already falls behind most of the country, the thought of the public is already gone....sheer numbers. Not only do we have some of the worst high-school graduation rates in the country, we continue to loose enrollment of our students. Shutting down partial services will do nothing to help the general public in this state, it will create a bandage that will in turn be torn off by the next policy maker, leaving another hole.
Um... how about no? Michigan has some of the best public schools in the country, not the worst, especially in Oakland County. You need to get your facts straight before you utter such nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2007, 05:38 PM
 
38 posts, read 121,379 times
Reputation: 23
Yes, agreed thats a little far fetched! Maybe Detroit public schools... I hope people reading these posts realize that there is ALOT more to Michigan than Detroit. Actually, the Suburbs of Detroit make up over 3/4 of the population of this area. There is Detroit, and then there is the rest of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2007, 07:12 PM
 
106 posts, read 573,335 times
Reputation: 68
Default Shut it down

I think a shut down is a good thing.
It will really drive home the point the total incompetence of this state leadership.

The state politicians are cowards cause they are afraid to lose their jobs.
The guys in Lansing better grow some balls and deal with this.

What about everyone else who has lost their job!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top