Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Military Life and Issues
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-24-2021, 12:41 PM
 
Location: U.S.
9,511 posts, read 9,096,362 times
Reputation: 5927

Advertisements

After President Biden pulls the U.S., the next NDAA (draft) has allocated funding for U.S. forces to remain in Afghanistan.

https://www.armed-services.senate.go...%20Summary.pdf

So how long will U.S. forces continue in Afghan after Biden’s pullout? Will it be thru 2024? Are there metrics to determine when the last of the forces will leave?

The NYT latest article doesn’t carry much optimism.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/21/u...n-taliban.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2021, 01:22 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 3,358,943 times
Reputation: 11017
The Embassy needs to be protected, along with HKIA (Hama Karzai Intl Airport). The plan was to keep 1k or more troops there to stop it all from spinning out of control.

But the Taliban is at the door right now. They hold roughly half the districts right now, and they are closing in on 17 of 34 provincial capitals. They also control 90% of the borders.

What’s ironic is that we have hit the Taliban and destroyed our own equipment, which was taken from the Afghan military. Where have we seen that before? Oh yea, in Iraq when ISIS seized equipment from the Iraq Army as they fled the war zone.

But we better do something, or Kabul will fall soon. Basically, we are staring at the optics of the fall of Saigon in ‘75, as the US flees the Embassy.

One thing is different though, and that is that we have the capability to strike them inside AFG anywhere, anytime. Will this be enough from discouraging them to move on Kabul and the US Embassy? Maybe, that’s why Milley has stated that it’s not a given that the Taliban will retake the country.

We never should have left. There was no reason to leave. As if we were going to save that money and not spend it on other stupid stuff and increase the deficit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2021, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,587 posts, read 7,095,508 times
Reputation: 9334
After 20 years I think it is high time we left that place. Let the Chinese see if they can tame them. The Brits couldn't the USSR couldn't. Now we couldn't. We should have left that place a long time ago. If our presence on the ground didn't stop hostilities then that means they don't want us. Let them stay in the stone age for all I care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2021, 06:13 AM
 
Location: U.S.
9,511 posts, read 9,096,362 times
Reputation: 5927
Default Why haven’t we left yet? And Why now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldsoldier1976 View Post
After 20 years I think it is high time we left that place. Let the Chinese see if they can tame them. The Brits couldn't the USSR couldn't. Now we couldn't. We should have left that place a long time ago. If our presence on the ground didn't stop hostilities then that means they don't want us. Let them stay in the stone age for all I care.
But we never left Germany, Italy nor Japan. We still haven’t left the Horn of Africa after thirty years (Somalia).
https://www.hoa.africom.mil/article/...teroperability

In fact, along with a JTF in Africa, AFRICOM was stood up.

It is interesting that nation building is now on the outs with Washington. One aspect of nation building is “whose left”? When Syria conflict started ten years ago, neighboring Jordan’s population increased by 30% and it skyrocketed housing prices since that 30% that fled had money. So even when Syria “stabilized”, those that fled did not return. Same thing with Afghanistan. In fact more are fleeing now so the reduced numbers of the professional class are few.

When you carve out say 15-20% of the brightest, richest, and most mobile in a country, who runs it?
Enduring problem and not just in Afghanistan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2021, 06:59 AM
 
Location: South of Cakalaki
5,723 posts, read 4,700,020 times
Reputation: 5173
Quote:
Originally Posted by WK91 View Post
We never should have left. There was no reason to leave. As if we were going to save that money and not spend it on other stupid stuff and increase the deficit.
Seriously, this never ending cluster should have ended 10 years ago. The Russians couldn't hold it with brutality and now we can't hold it with COIN. It's time to let it be what it's going to be. A dump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2021, 07:14 AM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,587 posts, read 7,095,508 times
Reputation: 9334
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonkk View Post
But we never left Germany, Italy nor Japan. We still haven’t left the Horn of Africa after thirty years (Somalia).
https://www.hoa.africom.mil/article/...teroperability

In fact, along with a JTF in Africa, AFRICOM was stood up.

It is interesting that nation building is now on the outs with Washington. One aspect of nation building is “whose left”? When Syria conflict started ten years ago, neighboring Jordan’s population increased by 30% and it skyrocketed housing prices since that 30% that fled had money. So even when Syria “stabilized”, those that fled did not return. Same thing with Afghanistan. In fact more are fleeing now so the reduced numbers of the professional class are few.

When you carve out say 15-20% of the brightest, richest, and most mobile in a country, who runs it?
Enduring problem and not just in Afghanistan.
We are in Germany Japan Korea Italy England parts of Africa with approval of stable governments. If we were under fire in those places we would leave there too.

I do not say we shouldn't have a presence forward. I like it in the limited ways we have agreements with host nations. But as a veteran of OIF1&2 (2003-04) I for one applauded the nation for acting then. I also on the same token wish that we would not try to nation build where our values and ideas are contrary to the ideas and values of that other population. I wanted us to leave Iraq after we picked up Sadam out of his spider hole and I wanted us to leave Afghanistan after we chased Bin Laden out of Tora Bora. Afghanistan is just not worth the lives lost and I lost some dear friends there. JMHO Let them have that country and go back to the stone age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2021, 01:42 PM
 
8,726 posts, read 7,418,936 times
Reputation: 12612
Quote:
Originally Posted by m1a1mg View Post
Seriously, this never ending cluster should have ended 10 years ago. The Russians couldn't hold it with brutality and now we can't hold it with COIN. It's time to let it be what it's going to be. A dump.
The Soviets were doing fine, and the Afghan government before the Soviet intervention, was doing fine, until first Pakistan started backing the Islamic radicals, with US assistance, then the US directly intervened when the Soviets directly intervened.

Without that initial joint Pakistan-US backing of the 1970's uprising by the Islamic radicals, Afghanistan would have been a much, much better place today, probably not much different than some of the ex-USSR stans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2021, 04:47 PM
 
Location: South of Cakalaki
5,723 posts, read 4,700,020 times
Reputation: 5173
Quote:
Originally Posted by k350 View Post
The Soviets were doing fine, and the Afghan government before the Soviet intervention, was doing fine, until first Pakistan started backing the Islamic radicals, with US assistance, then the US directly intervened when the Soviets directly intervened.

Without that initial joint Pakistan-US backing of the 1970's uprising by the Islamic radicals, Afghanistan would have been a much, much better place today, probably not much different than some of the ex-USSR stans.
That is possibly the most convoluted history of Afghanistan I've ever read. You need to read more. Much, much more. There is fairly decent coverage in European media of Afghanistan.

Start here: Afghanistan: A Military History from Alexander the Great to the War against the Taliban


The 'Stans are not all that great. You don't hear much about them as they aren't very interesting to the average American. (But neither was Afghanistan prior to the Soviet invasion, and then only moderately.) But start here and branch out:
https://theobserver-qiaa.org/meet-th...f-central-asia

https://saisreview.sais.jhu.edu/the-...united-states/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2021, 05:21 PM
 
8,726 posts, read 7,418,936 times
Reputation: 12612
Quote:
Originally Posted by m1a1mg View Post
That is possibly the most convoluted history of Afghanistan I've ever read. You need to read more. Much, much more. There is fairly decent coverage in European media of Afghanistan.

Start here: Afghanistan: A Military History from Alexander the Great to the War against the Taliban
I did not give the history of Afghanistan, lol. But if you think it is now, or in the 2000's, or in the 90's, better than it was in the 40's, 60's, up through to the 78 coup and events after, you are delusional.


Quote:
Originally Posted by m1a1mg View Post
The 'Stans are not all that great. You don't hear much about them as they aren't very interesting to the average American. (But neither was Afghanistan prior to the Soviet invasion, and then only moderately.) But start here and branch out:
https://theobserver-qiaa.org/meet-th...f-central-asia

https://saisreview.sais.jhu.edu/the-...united-states/
I am from one of the ex-USSR stans, so please tell me, how is it? You from there? Have a lot of family there?

I can tell you this, a hell of a lot better than Afghanistan is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2021, 05:41 PM
 
Location: South of Cakalaki
5,723 posts, read 4,700,020 times
Reputation: 5173
Quote:
Originally Posted by k350 View Post
I did not give the history of Afghanistan, lol. But if you think it is now, or in the 2000's, or in the 90's, better than it was in the 40's, 60's, up through to the 78 coup and events after, you are delusional

I am from one of the ex-USSR stans, so please tell me, how is it? You from there? Have a lot of family there?

I can tell you this, a hell of a lot better than Afghanistan is.
You gave a brief section of Afghan history. Sure, Afghanistan had good times. I’ve seen photos of Kabul in the 60s. But it has consistently, throughout history, been in tumult. And I agree, it was a much better place prior to the Soviets and Americans using it as a playground. But what place you reached to find that Afghanistan was better off with the Soviets running the show makes me wonder whose side you were on.

Finally, being from a place doesn’t necessarily provide the necessary tools to look within. I spent 5 years working on the ‘stans. So I know a little.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Military Life and Issues

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top