Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Wisconsin > Milwaukee
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-24-2014, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Bay View, Milwaukee
2,567 posts, read 5,312,081 times
Reputation: 3673

Advertisements

Wisconsin is well known for its Public Trust Doctrine, which stipulates that Lake Michigan, including shoreline from the water's edge to the high water mark, belongs to the public. In the city of Milwaukee, the Public Trust Doctrine has been at the heart of discussions related to development of lakefront property for commercial and private uses.

One thing I don't quite understand, though, is that in some stuff I've read, such as Shorewood's own code of laws, there are references to "privately owned beach property bordering on Lake Michigan," including prohibitions which forbid people "except the riparian owners or their permittees, to bathe, picnic on, or frequent" these "private" properties. In Shorewood's case, there have been discussions about establishing fences to keep people from straying from Atwater Park onto adjacent "private" beach properties.

So, I'm wondering if someone can clear things up for me. How can Shorewood, and presumably other communities, have laws upholding private ownership and exclusive use of property that falls under the Public Trust Doctrine?

Are private landlords granted exclusive use of such properties, as a special exemption to the Doctrine? Or is there an implied distinction between "beach" and "shoreline," with the private property on one side of the high water mark, and public property on the other? If so, why would it be illegal for a person to "frequent" a stretch of shoreline that would fall under the Public Trust Doctrine?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2014, 12:00 AM
 
319 posts, read 664,771 times
Reputation: 400
yes all water is public property, it's the access that can be private. Also Lake Michigan has been low for a while so the "high water mark" could be on the beach itself which means the beach is private access.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2014, 09:34 AM
 
Location: La Jolla, CA
7,284 posts, read 16,676,902 times
Reputation: 11675
Technically it's not illegal for a person to frequent a stretch of shoreline that is not part of a private beach. The access to the water is the issue. If a person arrived by boat, they could slosh up and down the shoreline all that they wanted to, providing that they weren't breaking some other law in the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Wisconsin > Milwaukee

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top