Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Mississippi
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-30-2013, 05:24 PM
 
324 posts, read 416,404 times
Reputation: 189

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
It's a dichotomy. The world is full of them, and there is almost no party which fits every member completely.

Here's an example you may appreciate:
Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Venezuela. Angola, Benin, Central African Rep.Chad, Congo, Dem. Rep. of Congo, Gabon, Guinea- Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Madagascar, Mali, Mauretania, Mauritius, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Somalia, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda. Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Sudan (r), Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen Ireland, Malta, Vatican City and a few others....

Know what that list of countries is? Those are the countries where abortion is absolutely prohibited except to save the life of the mother. So the question to a Democrat who is so concerned for the rights of women is: How can you possibly be in favor of foreign aid for a country which denies such a basic right as the right to choose?
So it kinda goes both ways. Assuming you are a Democrat, you don't get everything you want, just like I don't get everything I want as a Republican. But it's still our party of choice, and we will both do what we can to change our party of choice.
NIce try, but I have to disagree with your comparison.

Liberals argue women have the right to choose. That argument is primarilly based on their interpetation of the US Constitution, which only applies to the US. Conservatives base their argument on more of a Biblical/Religious pirinciple. My point is that libs feel abortion legal. Conservatives think abortions are prohibited not only by the law, but by God.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2013, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Jackson County, MS
40 posts, read 70,807 times
Reputation: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigman123 View Post
Actually, I think you will find that Dems usually, if not always, attempt to tie human rights language to aid packages.

Also, can you please name a country we give aid to, where the state punishes homosexuality with death.
Yemen and Mauritania come to mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2013, 08:58 PM
 
324 posts, read 416,404 times
Reputation: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by p-squared View Post
Yemen and Mauritania come to mind.
Thanks for the info. But as I said earlier, Dems usually try to tie human rights to aid packages.

For example:

Quote:
Barack Obama has ordered all US officials working overseas to use aid funds to “promote and protect” gay rights, prompting sharp criticism from Rick Perry, the Republican presidential hopeful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2013, 09:48 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,554 posts, read 17,256,908 times
Reputation: 37266
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigman123 View Post
NIce try, but I have to disagree with your comparison.

Liberals argue women have the right to choose. That argument is primarilly based on their interpetation of the US Constitution, which only applies to the US. Conservatives base their argument on more of a Biblical/Religious pirinciple. My point is that libs feel abortion legal. Conservatives think abortions are prohibited not only by the law, but by God.
There ya go again
I'm a conservative who would never vote for a liberal and I think no such thing. I think women have the right to choose. Sank your boat.

But back to the whole point and question of the thread, which is "why do voters in Mississippi support Republicans?"
I think the answer lies in the fact that Southern voters in general, and Mississippians in particular are about as independent minded as Americans get. It simply isn't possible to walk into a group of people in this state and predict their feelings on one of the more pressing issues. We vote for Republican Presidents, and then voted against the personhood amendment.

Go figure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 12:45 AM
 
324 posts, read 416,404 times
Reputation: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
There ya go again
I'm a conservative who would never vote for a liberal and I think no such thing. I think women have the right to choose. Sank your boat.

But back to the whole point and question of the thread, which is "why do voters in Mississippi support Republicans?"
I think the answer lies in the fact that Southern voters in general, and Mississippians in particular are about as independent minded as Americans get. It simply isn't possible to walk into a group of people in this state and predict their feelings on one of the more pressing issues. We vote for Republican Presidents, and then voted against the personhood amendment.

Go figure.

Nah... you didnt sink my boat, as I never said all Republicans or all Conservatives think that way. But Im pretty sure all your candidates for POTUS did state Biblical/religious views, as their stance on the abortion issue, and as you said, even you voted for them.

Mississippians independent minded, yes. But the facts say something different. This state is 3rd on the list of states who receive the most federal dollars. So just how independent are we? How hard can it be to balance a budget and keep state taxes low, when you have the ability to be one of the top recipients of federal money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 09:25 AM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,554 posts, read 17,256,908 times
Reputation: 37266
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigman123 View Post
............ This state is 3rd on the list of states who receive the most federal dollars. So just how independent are we? How hard can it be to balance a budget and keep state taxes low, when you have the ability to be one of the top recipients of federal money.
Nah. Your boat's getting a lot of holes.

Top 5 are Alaska, VA, MD, HI and NM.
States That Get The Most Federal Money - 24/7 Wall St.

Anyway, the question is: why do we vote Republican? I still maintain that the reason is because we know better than to vote Democratic.
I'm done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 10:54 AM
 
324 posts, read 416,404 times
Reputation: 189
The list I saw had MS 3rd, in regards to which states receive the most vs what they put in. Most Red States Take More Money From Washington Than They Put In | Mother Jones

I too would like to understand why MS votes for Republican. The numbers seem to indicate MS is not as independent as some would like to think. My guess, as to why this is a red state, is because much of the Evangelical population comes from MS and the south in general. But that whole abortion thing kinda blows some of their reasoning out of the water.Then you have fiscal Conservatives in the state. But how hard is it to be fiscaly conservative with your state's budget, when you're 3rd in line at the federal troth. Not too hard, one would think.

Todays conservative movement is based on alot mis-information, IMO. They say they want to return to a capitalist economy. But this country has never had a Capitalist economy. This country has always had a MIXED economy. I ask conservatives to simply point to a period in time and/or a country that has had a working, true free market/captialist economy, and they can never do it.

Then, you have the conservative's hatred of Obamacare. They constantly quote polls that say the majority of Americans don't like Obamacare. But they leave out the fact that, when you look into the poll they are quoting, more people dont like it because they feel it doesn't go 'left' enough.

IMO, Reagancare is the main reason we needed Obamacare. It was Reagan who signed EMTALA. EMTALA mandated that virtually every hospital in the country, must treat anyone who needs treatment, regardless of their ability or willingness to pay their bill. Imagine Obama saying to all burger joints that they must feed anyone who comes into their place of business hungry, regardless of their ability or willingness to pay. But for some strange reason, Reagan creating an UNFUNDED mandate, forcing private businesses to give their services away free, is OK. But Obama creating a way to actually FUND the Reagan mandate is socialism. Today's conservatism is really confusing and really doesnt seem a good fit for the realities of MS.

Last edited by bigman123; 03-31-2013 at 11:17 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Jefferson City 4 days a week, St. Louis 3 days a week
2,709 posts, read 5,092,866 times
Reputation: 1028
Why does Mississippi always vote Republican in national elections? Look back at its history and it is fairly easy to explain why. As the most stereotypically Southern state, Mississippi's voting anything besides Republican would send shockwaves throughout the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 03:55 PM
 
Location: Florida
861 posts, read 1,455,219 times
Reputation: 1446
According to 2012 exit polls, close to 90% of white Mississippians voted for Romney and around 95% of Mississippian blacks voted for Obama. Most people in Mississippi are white and almost all of them vote Republican so therefore, you have your answer. This was also the case in 2008.

However, prior to 1964 the state was mostly Democrat as was most of the South. The NE was mostly Republican though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Jefferson City 4 days a week, St. Louis 3 days a week
2,709 posts, read 5,092,866 times
Reputation: 1028
Quote:
Originally Posted by CountryFisher View Post
According to 2012 exit polls, close to 90% of white Mississippians voted for Romney and around 95% of Mississippian blacks voted for Obama. Most people in Mississippi are white and almost all of them vote Republican so therefore, you have your answer. This was also the case in 2008.

However, prior to 1964 the state was mostly Democrat as was most of the South. The NE was mostly Republican though.
Prior to 1964, being Democrat essentially meant the same thing as being a Republican today, and vice-versa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Mississippi
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top