Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2015, 09:13 AM
 
8,609 posts, read 5,618,718 times
Reputation: 5116

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeccscclhjhn View Post
From my experience, sometimes ignorance is bliss. Subject matter experts rarely (if ever?) enjoy films in their area of expertise. Take Robert Redford's survival tale All Is Lost (2013). Those who sail found many errors in the details. Historians or history buffs do not like biopics, from my experience. It's just the nature of the beast.
Similarly, Jeremy Renner got lots of heat from pro archers who said his form in Avengers is terrible. He obviously was not schooled in archery — or not for very long — before filming commenced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2015, 02:48 PM
 
282 posts, read 219,323 times
Reputation: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by irrelevant View Post
Let me start by saying that I am a programmer and have been one for a long time now. As a person in that field AI has always been close to my heart and seeing people who know nothing of it create such a wrong concept about it is just annoying.

In almost all movies about AI, androids, robots etc. the biggest achievement for the aforementioned is to develop feelings/emotions - that is totally wrong.

Emotions and feelings function in a lot simpler manner than intelligence and are thus far easier to replicate than the former. People often think emotions or feelings are this mysterious unpredictable thing but modern psychology and neuroscience have taught us they are based on pretty simple basic instincts. it can even be said that they are just more complex and develop instincts.

Creating a program/software that can behave like it's hurt, sad, happy etc. is completely possible. Sure it isn't easy but it isn't sci-fi either - it's possible and has been done even now. Creating a program/software that is capable of intelligent though... that's on an entirely different level.


So why all the fuss about emotions?...
LOL. I remember I have this 'talking computer' software in the late 90s. Much like this:

Cleverbot.com - a clever bot - speak to an AI with some Actual Intelligence?


I actually think it is sooooo cool. But of course most of the time its reply does not make sense. Now about creating programs for AI and emotions. I don't think there's a difference in complexity.

I studied programming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2015, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,897,671 times
Reputation: 14125
See Chappie and Ex Machina ASAP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top