Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The sequels are both a lot of fun. But the fact that the movies now had a huge budget meant the directors seemed to focus most attention on special effects instead of story. I still enjoy both a lot. But classics they are not.
The nature of sequels is that they are necessarily constrained by having to comport with the facts established by the previous installment(s). The original doesn't. As such, the first story is free to go anywhere, while the subsequent stories are not.
This doesn't mean that a sequel cannot be very good, sometimes even exceeding what it follows, but it does mean that the first movie (season, book, etc.) has an inherent advantage. And this often shows.
I think it does with the Back To The Future trilogy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
