Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Music
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2008, 08:19 PM
 
6,351 posts, read 9,979,937 times
Reputation: 3491

Advertisements

I have a friend who I haven't seen in a while (she moved out of state) and she's a mechanic...a VERY good one. Well, I talked to her recently and the conversation turned to some friends of mine who are always going on and on about wealthy celebrities and about how they have the best of everything because they're rich, and she said something that I had never thought of before.

See, while working for a BMW dealership she repaired allot of expensive cars, and while inside, curiosity would get the best of her and she would look at the built in MP3 player and what did she find?

Celine Dion
Britney
Etc etc...

Always the same generic pop crap, and maybe some generic hip-hop crap. NEVER did she find anyone with an expensive car listening to anything good and underground. She knows someone who works for a Bentley service place and he says the same thing. Which brings up a very good point: The one thing that money cannot dictate is taste in music.

I mean, if you want to have a nice wardrobe, you have to spend more money on expensive labels. If you want to have a nice car, you have to spend more money on it. If you want a nice house? More money...BUT, a Fields of the Nephilim CD and a Britney Spears CD cost the exact same thing. See what I mean? No matter how broke you are, you can easily have a much better music selection than a multimillionaire.

And I know, I know, "taste is relative"...but it isn't, less face it. I mean, is Prada better than Wal-Mart's clothing line? It is, officially, an opinion question, but people who know fashion of course know that Prada is better (and more expensive) Is a Penthouse better than a little condo? An opinion question...but it isn't really, and a Penthouse cost more.

But...BUT, is After Forever
YouTube - After Forever - Evoke Better Than Britney Spears
YouTube - Britney Spears - Womanizer (Director's Cut) ?

An opinion question...but it isn't And the After Forever CD cost THE EXACT SAME as the Britney Spears CD.

So, next time I see someone riding in a nice car, living in a big house, wearing a expensive outfit ( which I can care less about, sense I am proud of the fact that I don't care what I look like) I will smile and think, "yahh, you have the money to afford things I have never heard of...but with less money, I can have a MUCH better music collection and am listening to music you never heard of."

They might have Prada, Bentley, and a McMansion...but I have

After Forever
The Birthday Massacre
Within Temptation
VNV Nation
Epica
Laibach
Leftover Crack
:Wumpscut:
Love is Colder than Death
Autumn's Grey Solace
The Changelings
Death Cult
Atari Teenage Riot
Oomph!
Agnostic Front
Alien Sex Fiend
Skyclad
Aphex Twin etc etc ect...

And it cost me no more than their collection of Celion Dion's greatest hits (Simone Simmone from Epica has a much better voice, btw
YouTube - Epica - Cry For The Moon )

And I don't want to hear the "but big corporate bands and acts sell more albums so they must be good" because, guess what? I guarantee you that Wal-Mart's clothing line sells more than Prada, does that mean that it's better? Kia sells more than Rolls Royce, does that mean it's better?

Bottom line: the masses buy EN MASSE, wether it's the masses like me who are broke or the artistic masses buying their Christiana, Britney, and Emo crap. Hence, the crap always sells better than the good stuff, no matter what the commodity you're talking about.

So yes, music is the ONE thing that people like me can always have one up on anyone, no matter how much money they have.

Last edited by victorianpunk; 12-07-2008 at 08:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-08-2008, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Eastport, ME
400 posts, read 794,956 times
Reputation: 345
My wife has always said that I don't judge people on the content of their soul, but rather on the content of their record collection. I like your way better, though -- don't judge people on the content of their wallet, rather judge them on the content of their record collection
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2008, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Exit 14C
1,555 posts, read 4,150,747 times
Reputation: 399
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorianpunk View Post
And I know, I know, "taste is relative"...but it isn't, less face it.
I sure do not agree with you there.
Quote:
I mean, is Prada better than Wal-Mart's clothing line? It is, officially, an opinion question, but people who know fashion of course know that Prada is better (and more expensive)
"Better" is subjective no matter what we're talking about. Prada isn't objectively better than Wal-Mart clothing.
Quote:
Is a Penthouse better than a little condo? An opinion question...but it isn't really,
Yeah, it is. It depends on what someone likes, what they want, what they're looking for.
Quote:
But...BUT, is After Forever
YouTube - After Forever - Evoke Better Than Britney Spears
YouTube - Britney Spears - Womanizer (Director's Cut) ?
In my opinion, no. That After Forever song isn't better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2008, 11:44 AM
 
6,351 posts, read 9,979,937 times
Reputation: 3491
Quote:
Originally Posted by dano19606 View Post
My wife has always said that I don't judge people on the content of their soul, but rather on the content of their record collection. I like your way better, though -- don't judge people on the content of their wallet, rather judge them on the content of their record collection

I'm not saying their bad people, just that their taste in music blows. I have met a lot of nice people who listen to crap music. But in the end, because a great record is no more expensive than a awful one, taste in music is the one thing you can't blame on your economic situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2008, 11:57 AM
 
6,351 posts, read 9,979,937 times
Reputation: 3491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tungsten_Udder View Post
I sure do not agree with you there. "Better" is subjective no matter what we're talking about. Prada isn't objectively better than Wal-Mart clothing. Yeah, it is. It depends on what someone likes, what they want, what they're looking for. In my opinion, no. That After Forever song isn't better.

Okay, so a formally trained singer who went to one of Holland's best music schools is not better than a pop-tart from Arkansas?

Anyway, like I said...ask anyone in the fashion business if Prada is better than Wal-mart, and they will say yes. Ask anyone in the auto business is Volvo is better than Kia, and they will say yes. Ask anyone in the music business if...let's say you're talking about pop, if Goldfrapp
YouTube - Goldfrapp - Caravan Girl is better than Beyonce'
YouTube - Beyoncé - If I Were A Boy they will say "yes". It is objective...but it isn't.

The masses will always choice the lesser quality item and make it sell more, but with music, it is not the economic masses but rather the cultural masses.

Granted, Goldfrapp sells alright in the UK, but Europeans generally have much better taste in music than Americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2008, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Exit 14C
1,555 posts, read 4,150,747 times
Reputation: 399
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorianpunk View Post
Okay, so a formally trained singer who went to one of Holland's best music schools is not better than a pop-tart from Arkansas?
Not in my opinion in the case of those two songs, at least, no. Of course, I certainly do not judge music only on vocals, but even just judging the vocals on those two tunes, I do not like the After Forever song better.

Also, just to reiterate, I do not believe that any "better/worse" comparison can be sourced objectively. So no matter what two things we compare--say, "Hitler being resurrected as a world leader vs. Gandhi"--whatever crazy thing we can dream up, I do not believe that one thing is objectively better than another.
Quote:
Anyway, like I said...ask anyone in the fashion business if Prada is better than Wal-mart, and they will say yes.
Even if that were so, it's irrelevant. The fact that everyone agrees on something doesn't make what they're agreeing on not an opinion; and it doesn't make what they're agreeing on objective.
Quote:
Ask anyone in the music business if...let's say you're talking about pop, if Goldfrapp
YouTube - Goldfrapp - Caravan Girl is better than Beyonce'
YouTube - Beyoncé - If I Were A Boy they will say "yes". It is objective...but it isn't.
I'm in the music business, and I have graduate degrees in music (as well as in philosophy). In this case, also, I do not like the Goldfrapp song any better. It's not that I dislike the After Forever or Goldfrapp songs, but I do not dislike commercial pop music at all either.
Quote:
Granted, Goldfrapp sells alright in the UK, but Europeans generally have much better taste in music than Americans.
Taste is subjective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2008, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Houston, Texas
10,447 posts, read 49,662,314 times
Reputation: 10615
YIKES !!!

That was a lot of chatter to get your point across. You are putting down other peoples taste in music? I can understand putting down rap or hippity hop because that is trash. Im a musician and some call me the Rock Professor due to my vast music vocabulary.....but in my over 50 years I have never even heard of let alone listened to even one of your 17 choices you listed that you call good. It appears you purchased all those 17 CDs for less then the cost of a Celine Dion CD if I understood you correctly. That should speak volumes of your taste in music.

That ain't calling you bad but I wonder why this is bothering you so much. Maybe they dont like your taste of music. I usually agree with you but that post was weird !

Last edited by desertsun41; 12-08-2008 at 07:00 PM.. Reason: sp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2008, 07:04 PM
 
6,351 posts, read 9,979,937 times
Reputation: 3491
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertsun41 View Post
YIKES !!!

That was a lot of chatter to get your point across. You are putting down other peoples taste in music? I can understand putting down rap or hippity hop because that is trash. Im a musician and some call me the Rock Professor due to my vast music vocabulary.....but in my over 50 years I have never even heard of let alone listened to even one of your 17 choices you listed that you call good. It appears you purchased all those 17 CDs for less then the cost of a Celine Dion CD if I understood you correctly. That should speak volumes of your taste in music.

That ain't calling you bad but I wonder why this is bothering you so much. Maybe they dont like your taste of music.

"The Rock Professor" who has never heard of Atari Teenage Riot, one of the most, if not THE most, important punk bands of the last 20 years? Or VNV Nation, the founders of the "Futurepop" movement and the leaders of the new wave of EBM? Aphex Twin...YOU NEVER HEARD OF APHEX TWIN!?!? "Selected Ambient Works" Hello?!?!

Also, AS I SAID , Celine Dion CDs cost THE SAME as a Nightwish CD ( one of the best selling heavy metal bands on earth right now, but not big in the US...never heard of them either, huh ) That is what I am saying, that radio-crap cost THE SAME as good music.

Anyway, I suppose you are one of those people who equate knowledge of music with knowledge of classic rock? Just because I don't know what John Lennon's favorite breakfast cereal was does not mean that I don't know anything about music...but if someone has not heard of an ENTIRE SUBGENRE of music, like, lets say EBM Electronic body music - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia or Ethereal Goth Ethereal Wave - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia or Power Metal Power metal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, than perhaps the said person really doesn't know anything about MUSIC IN GENERARL and instead is one of those people who is all caught up in their own favored music while ignoring EVERY OTHER GENRES.


EDIT Hold on...YOU NEVER HEARD OF AGNOSTIC FRONT! !!!???!!?!!?!?!?!?!

THE GREATEST HARDCORE BAND EVER? THE GODFATHERS OF HARDCORE? Agnostic Front - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some "rock professor"...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2008, 11:17 PM
 
1,643 posts, read 4,435,509 times
Reputation: 1729
Lets face it, most mainstream pop music is just bad. Fairweather music fans tend to like very bad music. Is that such a bad thing? I'd rather they be listening to Britney Spears than The Gathering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2008, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Exit 14C
1,555 posts, read 4,150,747 times
Reputation: 399
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorianpunk View Post
Just fyi, I had no idea what that was until I looked it up. It's not that I do not know those artists--I'm familiar with at least some music by everyone mentioned in that article, and I like some of those artists quite a bit, but I've long not paid much attention to most popular genre labels, because, well, I think there are far too many genre labels, and many of them tend to be stupid, imo. The music the labels tag often isn't different enough to warrant a new label, imo, and often the attempts to come up with demarcation criteria for the genre most often do not provide a workable demarcation criteria at all. AND, often things that I do not consider part of the music as such have to be brought in--such as the semantic content of lyrics, political views of practitioners, clothing styles, etc.

On the other hand, I probably go too far in the other direction. For example, any dance oriented music that tends to be "four on the floor" (that is, emphasized, steady quarter notes on whatever is functioning as drums/percussion) I call "disco". (A bit of interesting trivia--"four on the floor" comes from the fact that in the early disco days, when it was usually drummers playing acoustic sets providing the drum/percussion sounds, the steady quarter notes tended to be played on the bass drum, which is played with a pedal--so you're literally pounding out "four (quarter notes per measure) on the floor".)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Music

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top