Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2010, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Peoria, AZ & Munds Park, AZ
177 posts, read 432,239 times
Reputation: 74

Advertisements

Anyone have a theory on why the world has been experiencing several large earthquakes, including one of the biggest in history? If the earth is releasing pressure-why? And if so, why has the pressure been released all around the globe? Could be a sign of a huge volcanic eruption, or albert einsteins theory that every 13,000 the ice at the poles gets to heavy and slightly pushes on the continents of the northern hemisphere, eg Asia, North America, and Europe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2010, 09:38 AM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,200,443 times
Reputation: 4801
Heavy polar ice doesn't cause earthquakes, usually activity along geological faults does. They may seem like they happen all over the world but earthquakes are generally tracked to a known fault line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2010, 07:55 PM
 
16,294 posts, read 28,534,911 times
Reputation: 8384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel NC View Post
Anyone have a theory on why the world has been experiencing several large earthquakes, including one of the biggest in history? If the earth is releasing pressure-why? And if so, why has the pressure been released all around the globe? Could be a sign of a huge volcanic eruption, or albert einsteins theory that every 13,000 the ice at the poles gets to heavy and slightly pushes on the continents of the northern hemisphere, eg Asia, North America, and Europe.
Those are just scare tactics form the "end of times" crowd. The incidents of earthquakes is actually down from 5 years ago, but that also is probably meaningless.

First you need to understand that the "average" number is just that, an "average" and that includes the slow years and the busy years, even the extremes. Even if it was double, or half the "average" it would all be within the "normal".

Second point, to look at a mere 5 months data of this year and to come to any kind of conclusion regarding trends on a planet that is billions of years old, well, it's just absurd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Interior Low Plateau
185 posts, read 404,501 times
Reputation: 99
Some perspective from USGS:


Earthquake Facts and Statistics


Same as it ever was!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Peoria, AZ & Munds Park, AZ
177 posts, read 432,239 times
Reputation: 74
Well, the heavy ice would never cause an earthquake. it would put pressure between techtonic plates. Im sure it is a scare tactic. But large earthquakes of 7 magnitude or more, including the 8.8 magnitude in chile, are quite uncommon, and having 4 of them allready this year is incredible. even if the worlds earthquake rate id down from average, several areas are experiencing many more earthquakes than normal, and some regions like southeast asia have already had 2 large earthquakes. Major earthquakes are happening more frequently, not the total amount of earthquakes recorded throughout the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Interior Low Plateau
185 posts, read 404,501 times
Reputation: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel NC View Post
Well, the heavy ice would never cause an earthquake. it would put pressure between techtonic plates. Im sure it is a scare tactic. But large earthquakes of 7 magnitude or more... are quite uncommon,
Did you not see the chart that I posted! On average there are 15 7.0+mag earthquakes every year.

Small earthquakes can occur when the ice melts(4 mag and less)from isostatic rebound, but it is not related to tectonic activity.

The people making absurd claims about earthquake frequency, end of times,... ect., have no training in geology. Don't listen to them-they are fools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 12:04 PM
 
7,372 posts, read 14,681,265 times
Reputation: 7045
God is angry at scientologists
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 01:33 PM
 
16,294 posts, read 28,534,911 times
Reputation: 8384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sman View Post
Some perspective from USGS:


Earthquake Facts and Statistics


Same as it ever was!
Danial doesn't want to look at facts, they are after all inconvenient to his beliefs, he needs to take this over to the religion area and title it "We're all gonna DIE" or some other end of times is near foolishness.

Of course that topic has been started there by the 'end of times crowd' and facts bounce off of them there also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Peoria, AZ & Munds Park, AZ
177 posts, read 432,239 times
Reputation: 74
Can we leave religion out of it! All im saying is that, yes there are 15 7.0s a year, but it is unusual to have so many so early. One in Baja Mexico, two in southeast Asia, one in Alaska, Southern california on April 4th, Chile had almost a 9.0, and several earthquake swarms have happened over the past 3 months in the Cascade Region, Imperial valley, Yellowstone, and weve had 3 in phoenix. We dont get earthquakes in phoenix, yet we felt one on easter day, in February, and on April 24th. I am looking at the facts. The end of time tactics dont work. The mayans calendar is ending. so what? The world has been predicted to end hundreds of times in the past century, and hey, were still here. There is no logical way that the world is going to end on an exact date. We can predict nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 01:24 PM
 
16,294 posts, read 28,534,911 times
Reputation: 8384
OK, that was my assumption based on the many that want to see the current earthquake frequency as a "sign". Religion is out:

Now to the illogical view that looking at the earth quakes over a 5 month period on a planet that is billions of years old, and say it is a "trend". Well that is just illogical.

I'm not a statistician, nor a mathematician, but I grasp some of the concepts and know that to do so is bogus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top