Trump: 'Serious Voter Fraud' in NH general election
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would love to see a comparison between the voting patterns of same day registration voters and the voting patterns of NH voters in general. If there is a significant disparity that may indicate there is some sort of fraud involved.
Good point.......willing to bet that same day voting is at least 95% democrat
Trumpty-dumpty better be careful what he wishes for. If alleged voter fraud is to be investigated, voter suppression would have to be, as well. Trump's functionaries did not hide the fact that they were combing through voter rolls within a few weeks of the election, looking for names to purge (illegal to do within 90 days of an election). One even proudly discussed his and his colleagues' activities and the reason for them on national radio in October.
Not to mention the news reports through election day of machines marking the opposite candidate to the one selected, voter ID requirements, closed polling stations and others being understaffed, etc. etc. Same old same old, that we've seen since the Bush II elections. No hanging chads this time, though. And New Mexico hasn't been allowed to use voting machines since the lawsuit in federal court proving that voting machines in rural Hispanic and Native American communities had been programmed to register a blank when the Dem Presidential candidate was selected (Kerry 2004). With paper ballots, NM got back to being a Dem state.
So interesting that the winner actually thinks he'd have something to gain by calling for investigations.
Go down to your town clerk and ask. Then post the results.
Otherwise pure hogwash.
Why dabble in facts when you can just speak in conjecture? On a serious note, I am sure its democratic leaning, but I suggest conservatives tread on personal freedoms lightly - including this latest "outrage". Limiting voter's rights is a dangerous path.
But why let actual facts get in the way of our personal opinions -- we're in a post truth world after all. Believe whatever you want and share fake news even if it leads to situations like this.
Trumpty-dumpty better be careful what he wishes for. If alleged voter fraud is to be investigated, voter suppression would have to be, as well. Trump's functionaries did not hide the fact that they were combing through voter rolls within a few weeks of the election, looking for names to purge (illegal to do within 90 days of an election). One even proudly discussed his and his colleagues' activities and the reason for them on national radio in October.
Not to mention the news reports through election day of machines marking the opposite candidate to the one selected, voter ID requirements, closed polling stations and others being understaffed, etc. etc. Same old same old, that we've seen since the Bush II elections. No hanging chads this time, though. And New Mexico hasn't been allowed to use voting machines since the lawsuit in federal court proving that voting machines in rural Hispanic and Native American communities had been programmed to register a blank when the Dem Presidential candidate was selected (Kerry 2004). With paper ballots, NM got back to being a Dem state.
So interesting that the winner actually thinks he'd have something to gain by calling for investigations.
I don't think anything constructive can be added here, and in case you wanted to fight, as always you can fight in the Politics forum, not here
Closed.
Yac.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.