Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2018, 10:38 PM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,710,630 times
Reputation: 25616

Advertisements

NJ property taxes is just outrageous but, it may not be that bad for good towns. As you can recoup the taxes in terms of high quality services. But one thing that is crazy is that many less well to do towns have very high property taxes too. One look at certain town's property public records reveals a bad street still has very high taxes from $12-14k

Take Irvington or parts of Union, there are many houses with $13k property taxes in very sketchy parts. Granted many of the houses there are already in foreclosure so the banks are paying for them.

Then you look at some $1.1mil house, it is only paying $16.5k property taxes in a good town. That's not so bad when you look at the size and quality of the town compare to some small house in a crummy town still paying $12k.

Some folks must be getting assistance because the certainly don't make enough to pay for the taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2018, 08:30 AM
 
1,319 posts, read 4,250,170 times
Reputation: 822
16.5k tax on 1.1mil house (1.5%) is low for prop tax for NJ. Avg is 2 to 2.5% in NJ.

So either that house you mentioned of 1.1.mil with 1.5% prop tax hasn't bee evaluated in a while (e.g. Jersey City had been putting off reval for years till last year) or that town has unusually low prop tax. New condos going up in downtown JC without tax breaks are informing potential buyers expect ballpark 2.22% of valuation for prop tax.

Prior to latest tax changes, specifically SALT. Paying 12-14k in crummy home probably meant that perhaps the home owner was taking that into account and was not paying a whole lot into their income taxes assuming they can reduce their end of the year total tax responsibilities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2018, 09:03 AM
 
7 posts, read 14,694 times
Reputation: 16
next year, once the tax returns are done, people will find out if they really can afford a house they bought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2018, 10:54 AM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,710,630 times
Reputation: 25616
Quote:
Originally Posted by babo111 View Post
16.5k tax on 1.1mil house (1.5%) is low for prop tax for NJ. Avg is 2 to 2.5% in NJ.

So either that house you mentioned of 1.1.mil with 1.5% prop tax hasn't bee evaluated in a while (e.g. Jersey City had been putting off reval for years till last year) or that town has unusually low prop tax. New condos going up in downtown JC without tax breaks are informing potential buyers expect ballpark 2.22% of valuation for prop tax.

Prior to latest tax changes, specifically SALT. Paying 12-14k in crummy home probably meant that perhaps the home owner was taking that into account and was not paying a whole lot into their income taxes assuming they can reduce their end of the year total tax responsibilities.
The tax re-eval in certain towns will probably have an effect in 2-3 years. It will take a bit of sticker shock and depending on the SALT calc a few cycles.

Places like West NY granted there are some very expensive condos and attached homes built there, but that's the water front. The rest of the area isn't so nice looking but expect to Pay $9k-13k for some of those homes not to mention Paterson also has high taxes in bad parts.

Jersey City and Newark is just so iffy and taxes can hurt when your property is not on the best parts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2018, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
4,031 posts, read 3,640,995 times
Reputation: 5859
Easy.

Step 1) Buy a house in 2001 at 1/4 of the price it's valued at today.

Step 2) Continue to live there and watch your property skyrocket while you get a meager 3% annual increase at work.

Step 3) Take out equity loans to max out your loan-to-value to help pay your property taxes, your daughter's wedding, your cruise to the Bahamas, and your mid-life crisis corvette.

Step 4) Go into foreclosure and blame Trump/Obama/Whatever candidate you dislike most at the moment

Step 5) Rinse and repeat
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2018, 11:02 PM
 
1,387 posts, read 4,017,978 times
Reputation: 929
I have wondered the same thing too. Towns like Hackensack and Lodi with obscene taxes. It really makes no sense to pay that much. Unfortunately areas like these will really feel the pinch of property tax write-off caps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:06 AM
 
1,883 posts, read 2,828,140 times
Reputation: 1305
I believe one of the reasons it's still in bare line affordable, is due to women participation in the workforce, basically due to double income vs mostly single income earners years ago. Now I rarely see stay at home moms anymore.


HudsonCoNJ is correct, a lot of people bought their first house pre-2000 before the huge jump in prices, partly due to crazy low interest rates, that tend to inflation all asset values, properties, stocks, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2018, 08:52 AM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
728 posts, read 1,966,077 times
Reputation: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
NJ property taxes is just outrageous but, it may not be that bad for good towns. As you can recoup the taxes in terms of high quality services. But one thing that is crazy is that many less well to do towns have very high property taxes too. One look at certain town's property public records reveals a bad street still has very high taxes from $12-14k

Take Irvington or parts of Union, there are many houses with $13k property taxes in very sketchy parts. Granted many of the houses there are already in foreclosure so the banks are paying for them.

Then you look at some $1.1mil house, it is only paying $16.5k property taxes in a good town. That's not so bad when you look at the size and quality of the town compare to some small house in a crummy town still paying $12k.

Some folks must be getting assistance because the certainly don't make enough to pay for the taxes.
I’m not familiar with taxes in Irvington but someone paying 14k on property taxes property has a huge multi family house (at least 3 family) and they aren’t living there. They own it to collect rent. The property value is so cheap that they still make money. Regarding Union there’s probably very few comparatively speaking super high tax homes.

Union is an ok place but when you look at the some of the worst places in north Jersey (Paterson, Irvington, East Orange, etc) they have artificially high tax rates. There are very few properties in these towns that have high assessments so the taxes as a net amount are low. There was some article about the highest tax Towns in NJ and it featured the wealthiest towns and they have low tax rates. For example a single family house in Irvington besides being half the price will have much less less taxes than a house in Florham Park which is known for low taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2018, 08:52 AM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,256,903 times
Reputation: 14336
Quote:
Originally Posted by babo111 View Post
16.5k tax on 1.1mil house (1.5%) is low for prop tax for NJ. Avg is 2 to 2.5% in NJ.

So either that house you mentioned of 1.1.mil with 1.5% prop tax hasn't bee evaluated in a while (e.g. Jersey City had been putting off reval for years till last year) or that town has unusually low prop tax. New condos going up in downtown JC without tax breaks are informing potential buyers expect ballpark 2.22% of valuation for prop tax.

Prior to latest tax changes, specifically SALT. Paying 12-14k in crummy home probably meant that perhaps the home owner was taking that into account and was not paying a whole lot into their income taxes assuming they can reduce their end of the year total tax responsibilities.
Many of the towns that low (or lower) are shore towns where there are expensive homes but there are not a lot of kids in the schools because many of the homeowners don’t live there during the school year. School children are a town’s largest expense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2018, 09:08 AM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,256,903 times
Reputation: 14336
Quote:
Originally Posted by nykstevenyg View Post
I’m not familiar with taxes in Irvington but someone paying 14k on property taxes property has a huge multi family house (at least 3 family) and they aren’t living there. They own it to collect rent. The property value is so cheap that they still make money. Regarding Union there’s probably very few comparatively speaking super high tax homes.

Union is an ok place but when you look at the some of the worst places in north Jersey (Paterson, Irvington, East Orange, etc) they have artificially high tax rates. There are very few properties in these towns that have high assessments so the taxes as a net amount are low. There was some article about the highest tax Towns in NJ and it featured the wealthiest towns and they have low tax rates. For example a single family house in Irvington besides being half the price will have much less less taxes than a house in Florham Park which is known for low taxes.
You have picked a town with the highest effective tax rate and compared it to a town with one of the lowest.

Irvington is 5%.

Florham Park is 1.5%

(Effective tax rate numbers directly from the NJ Treasury department web site.)

Assuming reasonably recent valuations, a home in Florham Park that is valued 3X that of a home in Irvington, will still pay less actual dollars than the Irvington home.

Is it fair?

When it comes to property taxes, fairness isn’t a factor. The town has expenses that need to be paid somehow. If the homes are not worth a lot, they will be taxed at a higher percentage, because as I said, the town’s expenses have to be paid one way or another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top