Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2009, 06:14 PM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,694,578 times
Reputation: 5331

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEmissary View Post
One of the reasons behind the high property taxes is actually the "low rate" on NJ State income taxes. Although the top bracket has a relatively high rate, it kicks in at a fairly high income. Here in NC, the top rate kicks in at $60,000. Does anyone in NJ pay $4500 on $60,000 in state income tax? I believe the slightly higher top rate in NJ starts at around $150,000. I can well remember Christy Whitman's claim of lowering the state income tax in 1994, but the next year local property taxes increased dramatically! This had the effect of decreasing the taxes on the wealthy and moving more of them onto middle-class earners. It's truly amazing how $30,000 wage earners complained about the so-called "death taxes" when only "million dollar and higher" estates were paying them, but on the repeal of those "death taxes", those $30,000 wage earners had to make up the shortfall. It's baffles me how many low-income people drank that "Kool-Aid!
it's actually $500K, not $150K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2009, 06:16 PM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,694,578 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike0421 View Post
But Wiley,

By cause and effect, in large measure, they are influenced by the governor. Corzine has lowered income tax revenues to the municipalities. The original intent of the income tax in 1976 was specifically for this purpose, to take pressure off the local portion of the property tax bill, which is heavily influenced by school spending. The SC of NJ has, through a series of rulings, steered increasingly more money to city districts, at the expense of rural and suburban districts. I've said this before: 33 districts in NJ consume 60% of the income taxes remitted to the statehouse.

<snip>
our township budget has increased an average of less than 3% per year since Corzine took office. Is that unreasonable?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 06:18 PM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,694,578 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPBsr View Post
Sure, keep on believing that the Dems are your freinds.
steve lonegan certainly has made it clear he's no friend to the lower class working poor. what should they do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 06:20 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,957 posts, read 8,493,779 times
Reputation: 6777
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahiti View Post
it's actually $500K, not $150K.
tahiti - All I can say is WOW! I've actually come across a few people originally from NJ that have ended up paying waaay more overall, in taxes in NC vs. NJ because of the high state income tax in NC, which can end up trumping the lower property tax here. In the long run, each state possesses those unique "gotcha areas" when it comes to money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 06:27 PM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,694,578 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEmissary View Post
tahiti - All I can say is WOW! I've actually come across a few people originally from NJ that have ended up paying waaay more overall, in taxes in NC vs. NJ because of the high state income tax in NC, which can end up trumping the lower property tax here. In the long run, each state possesses those unique "gotcha areas" when it comes to money.
em - actually, let me amend that - the TOP rate is for earners in excess of $500K (that's what I focused on), which is 9%. the next tier down is from $75K - $500K, and that's 6.37%.


I just figured out how much my state taxes would be in NC - it literally negates any property tax savings I would gain. YMMV.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 06:41 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,957 posts, read 8,493,779 times
Reputation: 6777
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahiti View Post
em - actually, let me amend that - the TOP rate is for earners in excess of $500K (that's what I focused on), which is 9%. the next tier down is from $75K - $500K, and that's 6.37%.


I just figured out how much my state taxes would be in NC - it literally negates any property tax savings I would gain. YMMV.
The lower car insurance might be a deal breaker!

Luckily for me, being retired, and "clinically poor" by NJ standards and due to a lovely NC Supreme Court decision (thanks, Bailey whoever you were!) that exempts federal pensions, I can actually pretend I'm lower middle-class again!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 06:52 PM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,694,578 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEmissary View Post
The lower car insurance might be a deal breaker!

Luckily for me, being retired, and "clinically poor" by NJ standards and due to a lovely NC Supreme Court decision (thanks, Bailey whoever you were!) that exempts federal pensions, I can actually pretend I'm lower middle-class again!
we spoke about this - my car insurance is really low already (about $600/yr per car)!! LOL - pays to live in the sticks, have good driving records and of course, belong to NJM.

the taxing of pensions (or non taxing, as it may be) is really the attractive pull for retirees. my IL's were investigating SC at one time but I don't think they'll leave.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 07:34 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,957 posts, read 8,493,779 times
Reputation: 6777
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahiti View Post
we spoke about this - my car insurance is really low already (about $600/yr per car)!! LOL - pays to live in the sticks, have good driving records and of course, belong to NJM.

the taxing of pensions (or non taxing, as it may be) is really the attractive pull for retirees. my IL's were investigating SC at one time but I don't think they'll leave.
$600 is low, in fact very low for NJ, but I got you beat at $371. But you're practically a teenager compared to me so congrats on that rate! SC does have lower taxes than NC for retirees (me excepted) but that comes with a price. The governor there would make Attilla the Hun look like a bleeding-heart liberal. You may not pay alot in taxes, but you don't get much for what you do pay for. As we say in NC -"South Carolina, one screen door away from Hell"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 07:37 PM
 
323 posts, read 575,538 times
Reputation: 333
ok ,you ppl behave ,or im gonna have to lock this thread


i prefer a consumption tax myself
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 10:02 PM
 
Location: DFW
2,964 posts, read 3,532,338 times
Reputation: 1835
Even my Liberal Relatives from the NYC area feel that NJ/NYC Area property taxes are ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top