Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-15-2012, 03:51 PM
 
1,682 posts, read 3,169,141 times
Reputation: 730

Advertisements

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7047/6...0b69e4b3_b.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7249/6...ccc8d124_b.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7137/7...b8cf3076_b.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7077/7...7b795404_b.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7120/7...a5ec5905_b.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7038/7...7f299865_b.jpg
Credit: sbarn/skyscrapercity

Last edited by bmwguydc; 05-15-2012 at 10:14 PM.. Reason: Post only your own images, please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2012, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
1,405 posts, read 2,451,047 times
Reputation: 887
The days of the Empire State Building dominating Midtown are numbered (I will still live that building though).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2012, 09:50 PM
 
669 posts, read 1,274,038 times
Reputation: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuddedLeather View Post
The days of the Empire State Building dominating Midtown are numbered (I will still live that building though).
It's gonna be interesting seeing a few building taller than the Empire State building in Midtown, but it's about time these Asian cities have been progressing so rapidly it's good to see NYC being very competitive again when it comes skyscrapers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2012, 10:26 PM
 
242 posts, read 1,184,792 times
Reputation: 161
I hate it. The last thing I would ever want to see is the old beautiful gothic skyscrapers trumped by huge ugly "modern" concoctions of glass and steel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2012, 10:41 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
1,405 posts, read 2,451,047 times
Reputation: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshd9124 View Post
It's gonna be interesting seeing a few building taller than the Empire State building in Midtown, but it's about time these Asian cities have been progressing so rapidly it's good to see NYC being very competitive again when it comes skyscrapers
Quote:
Originally Posted by knh39 View Post
I hate it. The last thing I would ever want to see is the old beautiful gothic skyscrapers trumped by huge ugly "modern" concoctions of glass and steel.
I'm torn between the two because I like to see NY competitive with skyscrapers, but I too love the older feel the 'vintage' towers have. It will probably look better in person as opposed to renderings though so we'll see. I want to see NY in 100 years.

Do you guys think this century will be the century of the other boroughs? Sort of how Manhattan was the 'focus' (in a way) in the early 1900's? Primarily in Brooklyn and Queens I see a lot of new developments happening and it has me thinking this century is building the new (future) generation of 'NY'. I don't know how to explain it really...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2012, 12:19 AM
 
Location: London, NYC, DC
1,118 posts, read 2,287,522 times
Reputation: 672
@StuddedLeather:

I wouldn't be surprised if we saw skyscraper booms in Downtown Brooklyn, Long Island City, and the Williamsburg waterfront. The groundwork is already there and some preliminary buildings exist, but development has yet to hit the point where it'll catalyze the development of truly unique skylines in each of the three.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2012, 01:40 AM
 
669 posts, read 1,274,038 times
Reputation: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuddedLeather View Post
I'm torn between the two because I like to see NY competitive with skyscrapers, but I too love the older feel the 'vintage' towers have. It will probably look better in person as opposed to renderings though so we'll see. I want to see NY in 100 years.

Do you guys think this century will be the century of the other boroughs? Sort of how Manhattan was the 'focus' (in a way) in the early 1900's? Primarily in Brooklyn and Queens I see a lot of new developments happening and it has me thinking this century is building the new (future) generation of 'NY'. I don't know how to explain it really...
I hope I wanna see a vibrant downtown BK and LIC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2012, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Harlem World
555 posts, read 1,184,025 times
Reputation: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by knh39 View Post
I hate it. The last thing I would ever want to see is the old beautiful gothic skyscrapers trumped by huge ugly "modern" concoctions of glass and steel.

God I couldnt agree more
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2012, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,607,468 times
Reputation: 10616
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshd9124 View Post
It's gonna be interesting seeing a few building taller than the Empire State building in Midtown, but it's about time these Asian cities have been progressing so rapidly it's good to see NYC being very competitive again when it comes skyscrapers
Other than bragging rights, is there a good reason why we have to continue building more and even taller skyscrapers? The Empire State Building was completed in 1931--and for all these 81 years, it's been underused. The World Trade Center was never fully occupied, either.

Why do we need gigantic buildings that are only going to be partly tenanted?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2012, 08:49 AM
 
Location: London, NYC, DC
1,118 posts, read 2,287,522 times
Reputation: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred314X View Post
Other than bragging rights, is there a good reason why we have to continue building more and even taller skyscrapers? The Empire State Building was completed in 1931--and for all these 81 years, it's been underused. The World Trade Center was never fully occupied, either.

Why do we need gigantic buildings that are only going to be partly tenanted?
Because New York has the highest rents and lowest vacancy rates in the country. Despite what you're saying, it's along the lines of 10.5%, which is ridiculously low when compared to the rest of the country, but well over $50 on average, with a number of sections of the island hitting $90+. And that's for office. For residential, I don't know, maybe we have one of the world's tightest and most expensive residential markets…
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top