Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNigh
Does it financially make sense to retire in NYC?
|
That is the gist of the question, which you, and others, fail to comprehend.
Quote:
Location wise I mean retiring in the same home you bought that let you work 30 minutes from the lower half of Manhattan.
|
Key word, "BOUGHT"! Not, buying...
Does that mean he is considering buying?
Or, is he implying a typical *native* NYer circumstance?
People, who, having lived and worked here all their lives, raised their families, and are now contemplating RETIREMENT! Do theey, and can they retire in NYC? What issues are a consideration, SPECIFICALLY *taxes*!
In regard to taxes, any knowledgable person would know and realize that TAXES are a serious issue for Retirees, on a fixed income and/or middle income, and, depending upon location, even those with a upper middle retirement income.
I wonder, does your life position cause you to have such concerns?
Retirees in most suburban locales have a real issues with the high cost of real property taxes. Those with midlin incomes often find, in retirement, they cannot afford the taxes on the home the have lived in for decades!!
Are you aware of this?
It is clear to any KNOWING intelligence that THIS is the issue which concerned the OP.
It is also apparent that he was unaware of the fairly UNIQUE tax circumstance of NYC. I believe he *presumed* real property taxes to be similar as MOST locales in the nation.
If you didn't know, virtually all locales, other than NYC, are dependant upon property taxes to fund government services, most particularly SCHOOLS.
Sooo, the OP, I imagined was under the impression that residential property taxes are ASTRONOMICAL, particularly, in relation to the cost of homes!!
It is quite reasonable, for someone unknowing of NYC, would think that, in retirement, residential taxes w/b unaffordable!
I believe I aptly informed the OP on the reality of the circumstance.
Quote:
It seems that if you are within 30 minutes of the lower part of Manhattan....
|
Now, I do not comprehend what is so confusing in this regard!!
WHAT are the MAJORITY incomes of those living within that perimeter? Please, can you respond?
Perhaps, YOU think it is a cornocopia of *incomes*. Sorry, but it is NOT, and it is and will become more and more expensive every year.
There are NO "stereotypes", it is just the way it is! Within a very few short years, ONLY upper middle incomes will be capable of affording to live within a 30 minute radius. The only poor or even middle income persons will be living in *subsodizedJ housing. The only people with less than a upper middle income, and NOT li ing in subsidized housing will be *singles* crammed into *roommate* situations.
The MAJORITY *areJ and will be 'upper middle' and above. You may think that to be presumptuous, but it is reality. To ignore reality is senseless! Even if you don't like it.
Quote:
...either taxes or maintenance fees are high enough that retiring there doesn't make sense. Therefore I guess, working in manhattan is only for people who will be there during their prime and leave when they retire?
|
I think THAT says it all!
Is that, or will that be, the case for the MAJORITY living within the 30 minute parimeter?
****
I am coming more and more to think that despite this being the NYC forum, the members here are NOT representative of the wealth that exist in NYC; nor rpresentative of the changing income demographic which are RAPIDLY overtaking life in NYC; and, that MOST of you, despite living in NYC, with the opportunity to interact with the whole cornicopia of lifestyles which exists in the five boroughs, too many appear surprisingly unaware of the reality of lifestyles outside of the radius of your personal lives!!
I mean really, like there is a zillion people in that perimeter earning $50K owning property! Or, even $75K!
That's ridiculous!
What is the income average of property owners within a 30 minute perimeter?
You are grossly unaware, if you do not realize that literally everyone, not subsidize or not bought in decades ago, has a upper middle income or better.
Correct, correct, correct!