Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-19-2008, 09:53 PM
 
1,729 posts, read 4,998,122 times
Reputation: 850

Advertisements

How do you feel now that NYC restaurants, by law, have to post the calories of each item on their menus. Will this stop you from eating your favorite foods?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-19-2008, 10:02 PM
 
2,742 posts, read 7,494,404 times
Reputation: 506
I think is only for chains(15 or more), which it should be ilegal...
If the chains have to do it,, all rest. should do it,
or nobody should do it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2008, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Bay Ridge, NY
1,915 posts, read 7,985,022 times
Reputation: 559
I don't really watch my calories.. maybe I should, but if I want something to eat, I'm eating it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2008, 10:12 PM
 
Location: East Village, NYC
217 posts, read 921,643 times
Reputation: 94
It's a stupid law made by stupid people. It won't mean a damn thing to anyone, especially anyone who eats ice cream.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2008, 10:13 PM
 
2,742 posts, read 7,494,404 times
Reputation: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by analyticalkeys View Post
I don't really watch my calories.. maybe I should, but if I want something to eat, I'm eating it.
hmmm, counting calories is not a way to live....
If you love food and you are fat,, hey that is your right... as long as you know what comes from it..and take responsibility...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2008, 10:25 PM
 
2,541 posts, read 11,335,406 times
Reputation: 988
Bloomberg thinks he is making his mark on NYC

He is probably sitting around somewhere thinking in the future how people are gonna be so grateful to him for doing this, and think what a great liberal mind he is for enacting this

Like people are really gonna remember him for this
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2008, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,603,290 times
Reputation: 10616
Quote:
Originally Posted by fubar_bohica View Post
It's a stupid law made by stupid people. It won't mean a damn thing to anyone, especially anyone who eats ice cream.
I don't know if it's a stupid law--but it's certainly an unimportant one. As you observe, it isn't going to mean a lot to most people. It seems to me that there are more pressing issues than forcing restaurants to list calorie counts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2008, 02:53 PM
 
Location: No Sleep Til Brooklyn
1,409 posts, read 5,250,356 times
Reputation: 613
It's more stupid nanny state stuff. Anyone could access the info if they wanted from corporate websites or 800 numbers. People don't want to know how many calories are in the things they eat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2008, 03:16 PM
 
7,079 posts, read 37,942,365 times
Reputation: 4088
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpsonDowns View Post
It's more stupid nanny state stuff. Anyone could access the info if they wanted from corporate websites or 800 numbers. People don't want to know how many calories are in the things they eat.
Actually, it's not 'nanny state' to me...The health care costs that result because of dietary indiscretions are mind boggling. If this law helps just ONE person avoid diabetes, or hypertension, or coronary artery disease, or a stroke, because that person started to think about the calories he/she was consuming, it's worth it. We ALL pay for the expensive health care these patients need, in the end, whether it's through our insurance or through our taxes which contributed to Medicare and Medicaid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2008, 04:13 PM
 
93 posts, read 309,384 times
Reputation: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viralmd View Post
Actually, it's not 'nanny state' to me...The health care costs that result because of dietary indiscretions are mind boggling. If this law helps just ONE person avoid diabetes, or hypertension, or coronary artery disease, or a stroke, because that person started to think about the calories he/she was consuming, it's worth it. We ALL pay for the expensive health care these patients need, in the end, whether it's through our insurance or through our taxes which contributed to Medicare and Medicaid.

That doesn't invalidate his comment. There's no end to to the amount of personal freedoms that can be infringed upon using the same basic argument. And if we're going to look at it in cold economic terms then you kind of have to balance the costs of care versus the savings when many of these people die prematurely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top