Quote:
Originally Posted by arbyunc
ab, do you have any links for the situations/cases you describe? Just curious, as I work in the mortgage industry and I've never heard of this being a problem. It seems odd to me because it's generally favorable for the bank to work out a mod, due to the costs and uncertainty of the foreclosure process. I don't think they would have much incentive to screw people over in this way. Also, if lack of documentation is the problem, it seems they would simply notify the homeowner and give them an opportunity to provide it.
|
I will try to dig them up - especially the Massachusetts one.
I don't think the banks are doing this on purpose - no one sat down in a closed room and rubbed their hands together and said "Heh heh now let's screw over the little people." :-) (Hahahaha BP is doing that job!)
I think it's disorganization, which is no surprise due to the volume, and no mechanism for oversight (I hate that word as it often means layers of bureaucracy that slow things down.)
Let me give you an example - I filled out the Request for Modification and Affidavit. Double-checked my answers, but, I did not fill out the field on page 2, upper right, "Size of Household". My mistake for sure. I faxed it along with other paperwork on April 22nd. Between that date and yesterday I had umpteen conversations with various reps (I did have one dedicated to me but he left and I ended up talking to two other reps) regarding various documents the processor needed - and I would immediately pull together the info and fax it. Then I would, a week later, call to make sure what I had faxed had been received, imaged, and was on file. Lots of contact, lots of conversations. I dotted my i's and crossed my t's. Not once, never, did anyone say "Hey! You didn't fill out the Size of Household field!" If they had I would have scrambled and done whatever was needed to rectify the mistake.
So I call yesterday, having FINALLY gotten the name and number of the processor (actually I had been calling and leaving messages since last week but yesterday was the first day I actually was able to reach him) and explain I'm touching base to see if all the paperwork is in order, did they get my last slug of faxes from June 3rd through June 10th. He says "Your file has been closed due to lack of documentation. You did not provide the Size of Household on page 2 of the Request for Modification form. All the documentation was due June 12th and you did not provide this, so your file is closed."
Heh, and I think "WTF!" since April 22nd no one has told me that info was lacking?? So I ask him if they have everything else needed, and he says yes. And I ask why didn't anyone tell me I missed filling that out and I could have corrected the mistake? THEY HAD A FRICKIN' 6 WEEKS TO LET ME KNOW! (I didn't yell or swear on the phone, just in my head.) He says he doesn't know, but it's the rules that if the doc isn't complete after 45 days the file is closed and I can start all over again, and he give me Loss Mitigation's number and tells me to call to start all over.
Now, this is round two for me with Wells Fargo. I received my trial mod w/Wachovia (late summer 2009) which went fine - paid every month on time and in the correct amount. Wells Fargo picked up my mortgage in the fall of 2009 -- let a lot of time pass -- December 23rd I received my paperwork for a permanent mod and damned if they didn't screw that up.
So now I begin round three. When I ask if I can talk to a manager, I get nowhere. When I ask who I can write, I get nowhere.
I don't know if it's a matter of Wells Fargo screwing up Wachovia trial mods, or if Wells Fargo is just a messy mess and lots of folks are having this happen. I am not sure how to find out about other's experiences, which is why I am poking around trying to find out if there's litigation, or a consumer group, or someone somewhere looking at this kind of stuff saying "Hey bank! Your homeowner did everything you asked, on time, correctly. And when they needed to correct something, they did, on time. Now bank, you have to at least be held to the same level of responsiveness."
So now you know more than you ever wanted to know.