Quote:
Originally Posted by VASpaceMan
Care to revisit this statement from 3 years ago?
|
sure.
it's a 3 year old thread. What happened over those 3 years? Continued growth.
Secondly, the "1,000 jobs lost" is just headline-scraping....
"as well as a technology company that was considering the creation of up to 1,000 jobs in our region."
...is what was in the Chamber's statement. Did this unnamed tech company have 1,000 employees now? We don't know. I could have a tech company that employed 1 person last year, employs 10 now, and claim I'm on a path to employ 1,000 in 2 years.
Now, I am also on record on these forums as opposing both HB2 and the Charlotte law. I don't personally feel there was any need either way to codify which bathroom folks that legitimately "identify" as another gender use. More importantly and relevant, if it's true that all discrimination claims get ignored at the state level and are kicked up to the federal EEOC, I'm opposed to that too.