Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-19-2016, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
1,951 posts, read 1,636,641 times
Reputation: 1577

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jotucker99 View Post
OMG . Look, for the last time man.

If a guy is living in Manhattan, not next to it in a better COL area, but living IN Manhattan, rent on a 1 bedroom apartment will be about $40,000 a year. Just renting the unit itself, not counting other expenses.

If the guy is making $50,000 a year, based on a national measurement he would be considered "the middle of the middle class", but because he's living in a high COL his final measurement is adjusted due to the higher costs of living. After taxes on that $50k, he might just have $40k left, which will ONLY be enough to pay his rent, he will have nothing left to buy food, clothes, shoes, healthcare, transportation, insurance, pay for utilities, etc, etc.

The cost of living in the area that you live in, determines what CLASS you are in. You can be making income that from a national measurement would be "considered" middle class, but if the area you live in has a distorted cost of living to where it's very HIGH to live there, your CLASS level is going to come down.

These are facts, not opinions, not speculations....these are facts. Why is this even a debate
It isn't a debate. If you can afford to live in an affluent area, you're affluent. If you can't, you're not. Simple.

Your class is determined before you choose where to live. Your class doesn't change because you have bigger or smaller bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2016, 12:36 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,168,483 times
Reputation: 4719
Quote:
Originally Posted by jotucker99 View Post
What is the cost of living index for Beverly Hills? If you have that link, post it and then I can tell you. I don't have time to look it up right now, I'm lazy
Well the median home price is over 3 million. It appears that the cost of living index is over 4x higher than most places in the US.

Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed

and looks to be almost 2x more expensive than Manhattan

Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed

Last edited by Yac; 02-25-2016 at 05:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Clinton Township, MI
1,901 posts, read 1,829,480 times
Reputation: 2329
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizzourah2006 View Post
Well the median home price is over 3 million. It appears that the cost of living index is over 4x higher than most places in the US.

Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed

and looks to be almost 2x more expensive than Manhattan
Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed
Yes, the distorted cost of living is going to require higher than normal incomes in this area to be considered middle class. You need $140,000 as an individual in Manhattan to get to the middle of the middle class, so I would think you would need at least $300,000 in Beverly Hills to be the middle of the middle class. Again, assuming you LIVE in (not around, but in) Beverly Hills.

Last edited by Yac; 02-25-2016 at 05:52 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 01:10 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,591,383 times
Reputation: 22772
I can't for the life of me figure out how people can understand the point being made here that living in a hcol in and of itself is a choice and a possible luxury.

If I make 100k, pay 25k to taxes and spend 75k on my lifestyle living in NYC

Or if I lived in bfe made 100k a year, paid 25k in taxes and traveled all over the world on the 75k those are all choices, the 100k is still a good salary and where I lived didn't change that. Where I lived changed what I spent my money on
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 01:12 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,168,483 times
Reputation: 4719
Quote:
Originally Posted by jotucker99 View Post
Yes, the distorted cost of living is going to require higher than normal incomes in this area to be considered middle class. You need $140,000 as an individual in Manhattan to get to the middle of the middle class, so I would think you would need at least $300,000 in Beverly Hills to be the middle of the middle class. Again, assuming you LIVE in (not around, but in) Beverly Hills.
So the fact that they could choose to live in a much more affordable area of LA or NYC is irrelevant in determining their class based off of income? So what if I choose to live in a penthouse in an area with a slightly lower cost of living, like say Chicago.

Let's say I think I work hard, I'm a lawyer in downtown Chicago and I make $300k/yr. I decide I want to live here because it's a few blocks from my office.

Penthouse in the Chicago Loop For Rent | Penthouse 89-A

Am I lower middle class? I definitely don't have a ton of disposable income left after paying for this very nice rental.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Clinton Township, MI
1,901 posts, read 1,829,480 times
Reputation: 2329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
I can't for the life of me figure out how people can understand the point being made here that living in a hcol in and of itself is a choice and a possible luxury.
Because you are WRONG. Again, I've listed facts. Keep debating your "opinions".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 01:16 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,591,383 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by jotucker99 View Post
Because you are WRONG. Again, I've listed facts. Keep debating your "opinions".

Your facts are a part of the debate. If I choose to live in an expensive area that's part of my lifestyle. I could choose to live in a mobile home and have a lambo as well but that would factor into your silly cnn link now would it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 01:23 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,168,483 times
Reputation: 4719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Your facts are a part of the debate. If I choose to live in an expensive area that's part of my lifestyle. I could choose to live in a mobile home and have a lambo as well but that would factor into your silly cnn link now would it?
If class is determined by disposable income left after basic living expenses this guy must be considered very wealthy.

Google employee lives in a truck in the parking lot - Business Insider

Meanwhile the young lawyer that cares about living in the upscale area of midtown manhattan that makes $200k is at best middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Clinton Township, MI
1,901 posts, read 1,829,480 times
Reputation: 2329
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizzourah2006 View Post
So the fact that they could choose to live in a much more affordable area of LA or NYC is irrelevant in determining their class based off of income?
I already answered this. You would compare the cost of living of that area v.s. the national measurement which is usually "100".


Quote:
Originally Posted by mizzourah2006 View Post
So what if I choose to live in a penthouse in an area with a slightly lower cost of living, like say Chicago. Let's say I think I work hard, I'm a lawyer in downtown Chicago and I make $300k/yr. I decide I want to live here because it's a few blocks from my office.

Penthouse in the Chicago Loop For Rent | Penthouse 89-A

Am I lower middle class? I definitely don't have a ton of disposable income left after paying for this very nice rental.
If you as an individual, make $300,000 per year in Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed, you are in the higher class and in the Top 1% of individual income earners in the country.

FACT.

Now, if you choose to spend a significant amount of money on real estate, that's your choice based on preference. But you don't have to buy a penthouse, that's what you preferred to buy as a form of recreation, not a necessity.

The guy living in Manhattan where the cheapest apartment is $3,000 a month, has NO CHOICE but to pay that, that's not a preference, it's a necessity IF he's going to live in Manhattan. If he doesn't like that necessity, he should not live in Manhattan.

Living in Chicago, you do NOT have to stay at a $3,000 a month residence or apartment. If you do so, that's solely your choice.

Last edited by Yac; 02-25-2016 at 05:52 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 01:33 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,168,483 times
Reputation: 4719
Quote:
Originally Posted by jotucker99 View Post
I already answered this. You would compare the cost of living of that area v.s. the national measurement which is usually "100".




If you as an individual, make $300,000 per year in Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed, you are in the higher class and in the Top 1% of individual income earners in the country.

FACT.

Now, if you choose to spend a significant amount of money on real estate, that's your choice based on preference. But you don't have to buy a penthouse, that's what you preferred to buy as a form of recreation, not a necessity.

The guy living in Manhattan where the cheapest apartment is $3,000 a month, has NO CHOICE but to pay that, that's not a preference, it's a necessity IF he's going to live in Manhattan. If he doesn't like that necessity, he should not live in Manhattan.

Living in Chicago, you do NOT have to stay at a $3,000 a month residence or apartment. If you do so, that's solely your choice.
So explain the difference between choosing to live in Manhattan and choosing to live in an apartment on the magnificent mile in Chicago? Why is one somehow different than the other? Both are the most expensive areas to live in a large metro area where there are any number of other cheaper options. They seem like the same thing to me.

Living in New York City you do not have to choose to stay at a $3,000 a month residence or apartment. If you do so, that's solely your choice.

Here you go, I found a 2 bedroom for rent for $1.35k/month in NYC. So why does the person living in NYC have to pay $3k/month again?

https://newyork.craigslist.org/fct/abo/5416747038.html

Last edited by Yac; 02-25-2016 at 05:51 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top