Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
...
They are frugal, Max out their 401k, take advantage of married filing jointly, buy only with coupons and bargains, travel in course of business and use reimbursements to the point they can't remember the last time they just booked a trip not with some Priceline deal.
If only I had known what a difference clipping coupons would make!
Not sure what's up with 2015 and in the region I live, but when my parents born in the 1950s, were in their mid-30s in the 1980s, this was by far the average....without exception:
Assets
2 fully owned automobiles (1 may be a voyager van, the sedan for daddy)....paid in full with title
Fully owned house with master bedroom and a bedroom for each child, kitchen, family room, living room, backyard, garage, patio, lawn, driveway, organized and clean, fully furnished....with
(no more than 7 years left on the mortgage till fully paid off mortgage)
IRA fund: $650,000 at least
401k: $550,000
Other fidelity savings:$250,000-$900,000 somewhere in there
$40-50,000 in liquid money market fund
$15,000 debit card ...
$500 cash on hand in wallet or home lock container
2-3 kids well fed, in gifted schools, music lessons, dance, ballet, soccer practice, tee-ball
No debt: perfect credit report
Happily married
This is where you SHOULD be at age 35. If not, you need to figure out where you went wrong. Is this correct?
How the hell are your IRA amounts greater than your 401k?
Seriously the contribution limits are drastically different.
Not sure what's up with 2015 and in the region I live, but when my parents born in the 1950s, were in their mid-30s in the 1980s, this was by far the average....without exception:
Assets
2 fully owned automobiles (1 may be a voyager van, the sedan for daddy)....paid in full with title
Fully owned house with master bedroom and a bedroom for each child, kitchen, family room, living room, backyard, garage, patio, lawn, driveway, organized and clean, fully furnished....with
(no more than 7 years left on the mortgage till fully paid off mortgage)
IRA fund: $650,000 at least
401k: $550,000
Other fidelity savings:$250,000-$900,000 somewhere in there
$40-50,000 in liquid money market fund
$15,000 debit card ...
$500 cash on hand in wallet or home lock container
2-3 kids well fed, in gifted schools, music lessons, dance, ballet, soccer practice, tee-ball
No debt: perfect credit report
Happily married
This is where you SHOULD be at age 35. If not, you need to figure out where you went wrong. Is this correct?
Is the house fully paid off or seven years left on the mortgage? I'm so confused.
Never mind, if I have to drive a Voyager minivan, forget it!
How the hell are your IRA amounts greater than your 401k?
Seriously the contribution limits are drastically different.
The problem isn't that the IRA is higher than the 401k, the problem is that the IRA is higher than it could possibly be at that age, given the limits, and anything approaching a reasonable rate of return.
IRA can easily be higher than 401k. My husband's and mine are. I've never had a 401k available to me, and husband only has for the last 5 years. So our IRA balances are both higher than his 401k.
Originally Posted by MDrenter223 How the hell are your IRA amounts greater than your 401k?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lacerta
IRA can easily be higher than 401k. My husband's and mine are. I've never had a 401k available to me, and husband only has for the last 5 years. So our IRA balances are both higher than his 401k.
Also - IIRC on the dates - Traditional IRA's began in 1974 and 401K's in 1978.
When I was working, my company didn't have a 401K plan until the mid-80's.
If only I had known what a difference clipping coupons would make!
Thanks for the laugh!
03-13-2015, 06:23 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
n/a posts
Divide all numbers in the OP by ten and you have a slightly less absurd picture of reality, though still unattainable for all but those near the top of wage earners.
I think the OP is simply mathematically challenged. He either:
1. Added an extra zero to all figures,
2. Mistook 35 for 65 when it comes to age,
Or
3. Mistook the 1980's for the 2080's.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.