Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2016, 04:01 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,141 posts, read 4,626,089 times
Reputation: 10619

Advertisements

Thanks for the helpful responses so far, everyone. To answer the earlier question, at 3 and 2/3 percent, the interest rate isn't that high at all. A few other points to clarify:

The timing isn't an all or nothing approach. For every $1,000 either invested or paying down the mortgage in a year, $300.00 may be paying down the mortgage (to give a hedge against volatility and the possibility of buying stocks that are high price plus work to remove debt), and of the remaining $700.00, about half would be invested faithfully each month on the exact same date each month, and the other half would be invested at a time during that year when it appears the market is in a dip (which may have some risks but it's not saving a fortune and then dropping it all in the market when things look like a good buy but could fall).

That's what the rough proportions of each approach would be which is essentially 30 percent mortgage paydown/35 percent dollar cost average/35 percent "conservative" market timing.

It essentially goes from guaranteed earnings (albeit at a low interest rate), to moderate risk (dollar cost averaging on autopilot), to being a little more risky by trying to buy at a bargain on the dips but not going crazy with that concept by putting lots of capital on the line by doing that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2016, 05:47 PM
 
1,858 posts, read 3,107,645 times
Reputation: 4239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jowel View Post
Thanks for the helpful responses so far, everyone. To answer the earlier question, at 3 and 2/3 percent, the interest rate isn't that high at all. A few other points to clarify:

The timing isn't an all or nothing approach. For every $1,000 either invested or paying down the mortgage in a year, $300.00 may be paying down the mortgage (to give a hedge against volatility and the possibility of buying stocks that are high price plus work to remove debt), and of the remaining $700.00, about half would be invested faithfully each month on the exact same date each month, and the other half would be invested at a time during that year when it appears the market is in a dip (which may have some risks but it's not saving a fortune and then dropping it all in the market when things look like a good buy but could fall).

That's what the rough proportions of each approach would be which is essentially 30 percent mortgage paydown/35 percent dollar cost average/35 percent "conservative" market timing.

It essentially goes from guaranteed earnings (albeit at a low interest rate), to moderate risk (dollar cost averaging on autopilot), to being a little more risky by trying to buy at a bargain on the dips but not going crazy with that concept by putting lots of capital on the line by doing that.
Too complicated for this old brain, but if that works for you, go for it. Personally, I like simplicity. When I had a mortgage, I had a set dollar amount that went to principal only on my mortgage and a set amount that went to investments. It happened every month without fail. I never had to think about it. That plan served me well, and I'd say I have done better than most. At some point, I just decided to pay the damn thing off.

i got better things to do than to try to squeeze every possible dollar out of the stock market. As long as I have enough to satisfy my needs I'm good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Arizona
3,159 posts, read 2,740,039 times
Reputation: 6077
If you're going to pay extra on a mortgage, DO IT EARLY.

The amortization schedule causes the highest amount of interest on the first payment then slowly reverses the amount applied to principle. You accrue more equity in the later stages of the loan. The effect is much like a sliding rate on the note. Your APR is merely an average over the term.

If you get this concept you'll make better decisions concerning mortgage payments vs. stock investments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 08:18 PM
 
26,194 posts, read 21,638,615 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy64 View Post
If you're going to pay extra on a mortgage, DO IT EARLY.

The amortization schedule causes the highest amount of interest on the first payment then slowly reverses the amount applied to principle. You accrue more equity in the later stages of the loan. The effect is much like a sliding rate on the note. Your APR is merely an average over the term.

If you get this concept you'll make better decisions concerning mortgage payments vs. stock investments.

You idea is incorrect on the interest. The interest rate always applies to the outstanding principle so even the last payment on a 4% 30 year mortgage is carrying the same rate. Your first payment is 4% interest and so is the last
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 08:44 PM
 
4,668 posts, read 3,908,056 times
Reputation: 3437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
You idea is incorrect on the interest. The interest rate always applies to the outstanding principle so even the last payment on a 4% 30 year mortgage is carrying the same rate. Your first payment is 4% interest and so is the last
I think he meant the actual dollar amount is reduced, not that the interest rate changes or is reduced. A 4% loan is always 4%, but early payments in the life of the loan will reduce the total amount of interest paid. This is correct isn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 09:05 PM
 
26,194 posts, read 21,638,615 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattks View Post
I think he meant the actual dollar amount is reduced, not that the interest rate changes or is reduced. A 4% loan is always 4%, but early payments in the life of the loan will reduce the total amount of interest paid. This is correct isn't it?
Any payment to princ on any simple interst loan will reduce the total interest paid. Thats clearly not the poster's point as they discuss the proportion of payment to interest/princ, there's no sliding rate of the note
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Arizona
3,159 posts, read 2,740,039 times
Reputation: 6077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
You idea is incorrect on the interest. The interest rate always applies to the outstanding principle so even the last payment on a 4% 30 year mortgage is carrying the same rate. Your first payment is 4% interest and so is the last
Your math is correct, but the EFFECT will shave the amount of interest paid.

Google "extra mortgage payment".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 09:08 PM
 
26,194 posts, read 21,638,615 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy64 View Post
Your math is correct, but the EFFECT will shave the amount of interest paid.

Google "extra mortgage payment".
I don't have to google anything. The rate doesnt slide and you are paying out 4% on a 4% loan no matter the ratio of princ/interest
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Arizona
3,159 posts, read 2,740,039 times
Reputation: 6077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
I don't have to google anything. The rate doesnt slide and you are paying out 4% on a 4% loan no matter the ratio of princ/interest
OK, then (carefully) re-read my last post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 10:26 PM
 
26,194 posts, read 21,638,615 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy64 View Post
OK, then (carefully) re-read my last post.

Rereading your last post, even carefully as though I didn't understand it the first time changes nothing that I said
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top