Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-01-2016, 08:58 PM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMat View Post
I don't get it... people think this is normal.

Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for - in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car, and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it.
--Ellen Goodman

Quote Details: Ellen Goodman: Normal is getting dressed... - The Quotations Page

Bottom line: Normal sucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-02-2016, 01:48 AM
 
106,679 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
No it's not. The rental market does not factor in the landlord's individual costs
exactly . it factors it in no more then selling your house factors in what you personally paid for it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2016, 02:46 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,269,032 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
Honestly, you need to learn to stop caring about what other people think. Maybe it's just the people I hang with are different, but I just don't experience what you're saying. I tend to think that if you are confident and happy with your own life choices, people sense that and will leave you alone (at least part of the time, maybe not always). Otherwise, tell those people to mind their own business.

Come to think about it, I have a friend who used to sort of tell me how crazy I was to rent, and I guess I never felt it as pressure. All of the advantages to owning a home that he cited were just not important to me. So I'd say to him "I really don't care about that". Which was true. I really didn't. I never experienced it as "pressure". He never says anything about it any more.
I got the constant "buy something" from my father during my early working years. 6 years into my career, I yielded to the pressure. This was 1988. The S&L meltdown and housing market crash happened about 18 months later. I'd purchased a not-very-nice condo at the peak of the market and got slaughtered. I sold it a few years later at 60 cents on the dollar. I accelerated payments to knock the balance down to where I could actually sell it. I had to borrow against my paid-for car at the closing to settle up. I learned a valuable lesson from that. Never buy something you wouldn't be happy to own and live in for the rest of your life. That's my real estate rule #1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2016, 03:12 PM
 
Location: New York
1,098 posts, read 1,246,573 times
Reputation: 1073
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
Honestly, you need to learn to stop caring about what other people think. Maybe it's just the people I hang with are different, but I just don't experience what you're saying. I tend to think that if you are confident and happy with your own life choices, people sense that and will leave you alone (at least part of the time, maybe not always). Otherwise, tell those people to mind their own business.

Come to think about it, I have a friend who used to sort of tell me how crazy I was to rent, and I guess I never felt it as pressure. All of the advantages to owning a home that he cited were just not important to me. So I'd say to him "I really don't care about that". Which was true. I really didn't. I never experienced it as "pressure". He never says anything about it any more.
It is often a good sign when you are not doing what "everyone" is telling you to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2016, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,490 posts, read 3,931,395 times
Reputation: 14538
I rented into my 30's without giving it a second thought. The advantage in home ownership comes toward the end. Now, at 63, my home is paid for and I can live here for the rest of my life for just the property taxes. Were I to rent a similar place, I'd be out about $ 3,000/month. But I think that at the OP's age, renting is just fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2016, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Florida
11,669 posts, read 17,953,214 times
Reputation: 8239
My rent is 17% of my gross income.

12% of my gross income is saved each month (as liquid cash) and 16% of my gross income is contributed to my 401k, so 28% of my gross income is saved or invested. Currently, at the age of 32, I have about $23,000 saved in my 401k. My employer does not provide any 401k matching at all.

I currently have about $56,000 in liquid cash and no debt and earn $70K a year.

Remember, I am single and have no dependents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2016, 04:27 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,591,383 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by nep321 View Post
My rent is 17% of my gross income.

12% of my gross income is saved each month (as liquid cash) and 16% of my gross income is contributed to my 401k, so 28% of my gross income is saved or invested. Currently, at the age of 32, I have about $23,000 saved in my 401k. My employer does not provide any 401k matching at all.

I currently have about $56,000 in liquid cash and no debt and earn $70K a year.

Remember, I am single and have no dependents.

Id opt for an Ira or Roth IRA before a nonmatching 401k plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2016, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Florida
11,669 posts, read 17,953,214 times
Reputation: 8239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Id opt for an Ira or Roth IRA before a nonmatching 401k plan.
That's a stupid suggestion. A 401k is basically the same thing as an IRA. And an IRA would require me to contribute after-tax money into it, because contributions cannot come directly from my paycheck as a pretax deduction like 401k contributions can. Also, I used to have a Roth IRA and hated it. Roth IRA's have less potential for higher long term growth, because the basis of contributions are lower than they could be, because they've been taxed. I am vehemently opposed to any form of after-tax retirement contributions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2016, 06:26 PM
 
18,103 posts, read 15,676,604 times
Reputation: 26803
I too lived in the Bay Area and was approaching 40 when I purchased my townhouse there. The prices were insane even back then. I waited and saved until I could put down over 20% and have a 1 yr cushion for paying expenses. Good thing as I needed that cushion after the tech market went bust in 2001.

Renting is valid and buying is valid. It all depends on your needs and wants and what your finances are as well as other factors. It's a big decision and it isn't right for everyone. If you're happy that's the only thing that matters and that's when you know it's the right thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2016, 06:34 PM
jw2
 
2,028 posts, read 3,266,879 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by nep321 View Post
That's a stupid suggestion. A 401k is basically the same thing as an IRA. And an IRA would require me to contribute after-tax money into it, because contributions cannot come directly from my paycheck as a pretax deduction like 401k contributions can. Also, I used to have a Roth IRA and hated it. Roth IRA's have less potential for higher long term growth, because the basis of contributions are lower than they could be, because they've been taxed. I am vehemently opposed to any form of after-tax retirement contributions.
You certainly are not the first person to call good suggestions stupid only because you don't understand the advantages and I don't imagine you will be the last.

The advantages of an traditional IRA over a non-matched 401k are reduced fees and a larger selection of investment options. The advantage of the 401k is (probably) a larger contribution limit. They each use tax deferred contributions. The IRA is a tax deduction on your tax form but the net result is the same.

The advantage of the Roth IRA over a (non Roth) 401k has to do when you wish to pay taxes and can be an ENORMOUS advantage, especially if you are young. But, depending on circumstances, it can be an advantage to take the deduction now

Last edited by jw2; 06-02-2016 at 06:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top