Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-30-2018, 04:42 PM
 
912 posts, read 1,731,907 times
Reputation: 1117

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dastars View Post
But they're exclusively domestic; Wow was a nice option for Europe or actually going to Iceland if cost was a concern or you're a low-frills traveler.
Spirit flies all over the Caribbean and even as far as Lima, Peru. You have a layover in Ft. Lauderdale for all of those though. Frontier flies to Cancun, but not out of PIT. They also recently added a codeshare with Volaris for other destinations in Mexico, but again, nothing direct from PIT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2018, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,148,549 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by amattaro View Post
Spirit, Frontier, and Allegiant still around for now, so the low-cost (until you do anything beside sit on the plane), unreliable airline options are still plentiful.
I'd rather pay the extra $100 or even more to not deal with those shady carriers myself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,189,699 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
I'd rather pay the extra $100 or even more to not deal with those shady carriers myself.
What makes you say they’re shady?

Baggage charges, no free peanuts or drinks, cheap fares, etc...?

Extremely curious as I recently flew Southwest and the seat comfort level was extremely similar to a recent Spirit (claim to have newest planes in the business) flight and the free drink and snack were extremely small. Other than baggage charges I’m not seeing a difference these days. Granted my recent trips have been back and forth from Florida due to me now being a snowbird so I can’t speak for many other recent destinations...and my Southwest flight was delayed due to a mechanical issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 06:41 PM
 
Location: Lawrenceville, Pittsburgh
2,109 posts, read 2,158,312 times
Reputation: 1845
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
What makes you say they’re shady?

Baggage charges, no free peanuts or drinks, cheap fares, etc...?

Extremely curious as I recently flew Southwest and the seat comfort level was extremely similar to a recent Spirit (claim to have newest planes in the business) flight and the free drink and snack were extremely small. Other than baggage charges I’m not seeing a difference these days. Granted my recent trips have been back and forth from Florida due to me now being a snowbird so I can’t speak for many other recent destinations...and my Southwest flight was delayed due to a mechanical issue.
Allegiant is known to have a poor maintenance and reliability record and are flying very old aircraft. In addition, none of the low cost carriers offer much in the way of options should your plans get botched due to either weather or carrier-induced issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,189,699 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsStanwix? View Post
Allegiant is known to have a poor maintenance and reliability record and are flying very old aircraft. In addition, none of the low cost carriers offer much in the way of options should your plans get botched due to either weather or carrier-induced issues.
Sounds like a reason to stay away from Allegiant, although I did recently hear about them buying new planes, and I would look into what options are available for plans being “botched”, but doesn’t sound like anything “shady” going on with all of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 07:42 PM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,957,812 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsStanwix? View Post
Allegiant is known to have a poor maintenance and reliability record and are flying very old aircraft.
I have to go to and from Florida all the time and to be honest this has not been my experience. I have been flying Delta with the damn layover in ATL for years, but I recently decided to fly Allegiant. The plane was newer, the flight attendants were very nice and the flights have been fine. I am now flying Allegiant as much as I can because no layover to SRQ.

I think the media had it in for them for some reason, but they are not trustworthy at all. To be honest my last two trips with Allegiant have been better than my Delta flights for the most part. Although Delta gave me two free drinks because a dog was barking constantly during a flight. I was happy as a clam about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2018, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Weirton, W. Va.
615 posts, read 393,676 times
Reputation: 264
I remember USAirways. They once had 600 flights a day from Pittsburgh. Nearly 12,000 people were employed by them in the Pittsburgh area.

Pittsburgh Mayor Tom Murphy set a good leadership example in the early 2000s by driving to Cleveland airport to take a cheaper flight. The Republican county executive refused to negotiate lowerlanding fees at Pit. Both made local news headlines at the time

The hub was relocated to Charlotte in 2003 and by 2005 nearly 10,000 jobs were lost and moved to Charlotte or Philly. Homes near where my parents live in moon didn’t sell for nearly 2 years. All Usair employees that lost their job and relocated.

In 2018 we want to spend a billion dollars to downsize the airport the same size as the original terminal that was demolished in 1991. Hopefully we can eclipse 200 flights a day in the near future. As long as the low cost cheap airlines such as WOW, allegiant and spirit don’t end flights when the tax payer subsidies dry up we should be ok. Southern airlines leads the airport in daily departures to economic boom towns such as Morgantown, Jamestown, Hagerstown and Harrisburg.

My what a difference and how far we have come since this airport opened in 1992
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2018, 05:22 PM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,957,812 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsburghaccuweather View Post
I remember USAirways. They once had 600 flights a day from Pittsburgh. Nearly 12,000 people were employed by them in the Pittsburgh area.

Pittsburgh Mayor Tom Murphy set a good leadership example in the early 2000s by driving to Cleveland airport to take a cheaper flight. The Republican county executive refused to negotiate lowerlanding fees at Pit. Both made local news headlines at the time

The hub was relocated to Charlotte in 2003 and by 2005 nearly 10,000 jobs were lost and moved to Charlotte or Philly. Homes near where my parents live in moon didn’t sell for nearly 2 years. All Usair employees that lost their job and relocated.

In 2018 we want to spend a billion dollars to downsize the airport the same size as the original terminal that was demolished in 1991. Hopefully we can eclipse 200 flights a day in the near future. As long as the low cost cheap airlines such as WOW, allegiant and spirit don’t end flights when the tax payer subsidies dry up we should be ok. Southern airlines leads the airport in daily departures to economic boom towns such as Morgantown, Jamestown, Hagerstown and Harrisburg.

My what a difference and how far we have come since this airport opened in 1992
I believe this is accurate, so it should be noted. I miss those days believe me. I loved having a hub here as you could fly everywhere. USAir is GONE, so it was going to be out of here no matter what anyway.

Our airport is lousy for the most part, but I was spoiled with a hub when I was young and flying everywhere. It sucks now. You never know, it might rebuild. Pittsburgh is doing better and better as it is still cheap and an "in" city. Lets hope for the best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2018, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Weirton, W. Va.
615 posts, read 393,676 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by gg View Post
I believe this is accurate, so it should be noted. I miss those days believe me. I loved having a hub here as you could fly everywhere. USAir is GONE, so it was going to be out of here no matter what anyway.

Our airport is lousy for the most part, but I was spoiled with a hub when I was young and flying everywhere. It sucks now. You never know, it might rebuild. Pittsburgh is doing better and better as it is still cheap and an "in" city. Lets hope for the best.
All of that is 100 percent accurate! It sounds jerky, but that is truth. I agree USAir would’ve left eventually anyways. Pittsburgh was a hub due to USAir being born here. It had nothing to do with local demand or business traffic. If you google articles written by airport experts you will see they agree Pittsburgh becoming a hub was a business mistake by USAir. Basically a footnote that other airlines won’t ever follow. The Pittsburgh hub in the new airport never made money for USAir. It was a money loser. Selfishly I miss all of those opinions as well. It was great to have the destinations of Atlanta or Detroit airports right here. Even though it cost more for tickets it was a lot better service

Old Pittsburgh airport was 53 gates. USAir didn’t want a new airport in Pittsburgh and said so in the mid to late 80s. They wanted to pay to renovate old Pitt airport and even stated the gates were underutilized due to age. Tom Forrester and the other county commissioners at the time kept pushing. USAir then got a new CEO and struck a deal for the new airport. They demolished white swan park at the 376 business split which was a local icon to build the hiway currently in place. The ceo agreed to a huge airport where they had 95 percent of the flights and footed the entire bill. Pitt was designed to have 30 to 40 million passengers a year. In 1997 it peaked at 21 million passengers. The highest landing fees in the nation for a long time. Pitt never made money because the local originating traffic couldn’t support all of those destinations. Hence it became a connector for everybody else. And the time it took people to connect at an airport in flyover country cost more than placing the hub in a large city or a growing city that could support the destinations locally. Time was money on that one.

There are a lot of destinations subsidized at Pitt today. Most of them will end when those subsidies run out. Some may stay who knows. I wouldn’t bet on it though. I remember watching the small USAir planes depart from concourse E which was demolished in 2009. Now I see the airlines we have serving the airport and destinations and daily departures. We are a very far cry from the good old days in the late 90s and just pre 911. That airport was buzzing and a big postive for a hard luck city at that time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2018, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Western PA
3,733 posts, read 5,962,766 times
Reputation: 3189
I remember how people complained about the high ticket prices from Pittsburgh when it was a hub and USAir had no competition. Yes, you could get to many more cities, but it cost you. Now, prices are lower (and the overall flying experience is terrible everywhere).

You can only have so many hub airports in this part of the country. Within an hour we have hubs in Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, Newark, JFK, and Washington. Denver, Atlanta, and Charlotte are the only sizable cities for hundreds of miles, so they can be hubs because they have a larger "catchment" area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top