PA GOP suppressing votes yet again. (basement, small business, rules)

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by h_curtis

If you don’t see this as a minor technicality being manipulated to punish democratic voters, you’re either stupid or disingenuous.

Except Dems voted 4-2, so that’s what they want. You’re calling your own party stupid or disingenuous.

[Pughnose]

Originally Posted by guy2073

Are democrats not capable of following directions or are they not capable of dating an envelope? I am curious to find out.

Yeah, you ninja'd me. Intriguing assumption made by the OP that false/illegible dates will likely appear mostly on the envelopes of Democrat voters. Seems like a pretty hurtful assumption to me.

[guy2073]

Originally Posted by Pughnose

Yeah, you ninja'd me. Intriguing assumption made by the OP that false/illegible dates will likely appear mostly on the envelopes of Democrat voters. Seems like a pretty hurtful assumption to me.

I like the one where the left says minorities can't get id to vote.

[RetireinPA]

[quote=h_curtis;64386453]

Originally Posted by RetireinPA

you do realize (prolly not) that the PASC is 4:2 Dem over GOP with 1 vacancy. They ruled unanimously.

This ruling (a 3-3 deadlock actually) was the result of a lawsuit brought by Republicans, in an attempt to suppress democratic votes (dems are statistically, significantly more likely to vote by mail), and it succeeded. Republicans succeeded in their continued efforts to suppress votes in order to give themselves an advantage. A single dem (Justice Kevin Dougherty sided with the 2 republican justices to make it a 3-3 split decision).

no. thats not how it happened. they voted 6-0 and issued a ruling (which has the weight of law) to erject non-compliant ballots because it is codified in PA state law. they set aside (meaning did not issue a ruling) whether or not the PA law that defines a compliant ballot violates the civil rights act (it does not and the USSC has ample precedent set)


This is a landmark ruling because the SAME PASC ruled 5-2 a couple years ago to VIOLATE PA state law and count non-compliant ballots. (but the guy who played Jethro died since then)

[RetireinPA]

Originally Posted by erieguy

So it was 4-2. Votes matter. It’s great to have choices, except when they don’t go one’s way

no it was 6-0, there are 4 dems and 2 reps and this time the 4 dems reversed themselves and WROTE the opinion that was contrary to what they issued in 2020. Mr curtis did not bother to research the makeup of the PASC before he posted.

[guy2073]

Originally Posted by RetireinPA

no it was 6-0, there are 4 dems and 2 reps and this time the 4 dems reversed themselves and WROTE the opinion that was contrary to what they issued in 2020. Mr curtis did not bother to research the makeup of the PASC before he posted.

If he needs help i can date his ballot for him.

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by RetireinPA

no it was 6-0, there are 4 dems and 2 reps and this time the 4 dems reversed themselves and WROTE the opinion that was contrary to what they issued in 2020. Mr curtis did not bother to research the makeup of the PASC before he posted.

Even better. Just goes to show more false claims, and even complaints when Dems vote for what they think is best. Some folks are just never happy.

[svband76]

Originally Posted by h_curtis

Pennsylvania officials cannot count votes from mail-in or absentee ballots that lack accurate, handwritten dates on their return envelopes, the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously Tuesday, a week before tabulation will begin in races for governor, the U.S. Senate and the state Legislature.

Seems reasonable to me.

You wouldn't execute a contract, or sign anything without properly dating it, correct?

[Reggiezz]

Originally Posted by svband76

Seems reasonable to me.

You wouldn't execute a contract, or sign anything without properly dating it, correct?

He'll have to ask his mom.

[szug-bot]

Originally Posted by Reggiezz

He'll have to ask his mom.

well, he'd have to put down his controller and pause the game....