Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2010, 07:03 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,455,747 times
Reputation: 3647

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I bet you loved it too.
You know what? That's really uncalled for. No, it wasn't the best speech. But he DIDN'T talk about global warming, cap & tax, etc. It was a bad speech because of how bland it was and how there wasn't enough, "umph." Call it what it was, but call it bad for the reasons it was bad. Don't lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2010, 07:25 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,469,105 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Pretty much the same across the board. Pathetic, disappointing, useless, meaningless, playing politics in an attempt to push his Cap&Tax.

Can we say now for certain that the WH staffers and obama are completely tone deaf? They are mostly young, inexperienced, immature ideologues (exactly like their boss) who have no idea what they are doing. Imagine coming out with a speech like that, at this late date in the crisis.

PostPartisan - Obama disappoints from the beginning of his speech



Well, what can one expect when they are in over their heads, drowning in their own political hackery?

Obama's Curiously Flat Gulf Speech - Newsweek



Obama Oil Spill Speech Reax: Epic Fail



Carter redux, on steroids. Anybody taken a look at Carter's "malaise" speech and this one?

Obama's Oil Spill Speech: What Was The Point?





Yes, we'd all like to see that happen, at least the first two. Reiterating his desires did absolutely nothing to tell the American people what his PLAN is to contain and clean up the oil. And the reason is - HE DOESN'T HAVE A PLAN, after 60 days, no plan.

Obama's Oil Spill Speech: Running On Empty | Mother Jones

Damn, how many times are his speechwriters going to regurgitate the same tired old cliches, platitudes and history lessons?



Pablum is a great description of what his speeches have been reduced to. I think it's about time beer-pong Tommy Vietor be replaced with a grown-up.

Hot Air » Video: Estimates of flow rate in Gulf continue to escalate

Do watch the CNN video, where even David Gergen has a hard time stomaching the rhetoric.

And one of the gentlemen with Cooper asks a really great question at the end.

"Alternative energy makes up only 3% of all the energy in this country.

No nukes, no oil, no transmission lines for wind and solar, what is it exactly
we're going to do to get up to alternative energy where it can CARRY this country's energy needs."

He's right - nobody ever asks the president that question.

These two local officials are really on point and focused on the issues.
Come on, let's be real here... there is nothing that he could have said or done under any circumstances that you would approve of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:26 PM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,878,442 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
It was a bad speech because of how bland it was and how there wasn't enough, "umph." Call it what it was, but call it bad for the reasons it was bad. Don't lie.
No, it was a bad speech because it was just empty words, with no action plan behind those words. Obama has no orderly plan in place after 60 days to clean up this mess. He is clueless. He obviously hasn't wised up yet that the US public doesn't want a speech, they want action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,000,570 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
You know what? That's really uncalled for. No, it wasn't the best speech. But he DIDN'T talk about global warming, cap & tax, etc. It was a bad speech because of how bland it was and how there wasn't enough, "umph." Call it what it was, but call it bad for the reasons it was bad. Don't lie.
Why is that uncalled for? One can assume that his ardent supporters would have loved the speech, empty and pathetic as it was.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Come on, let's be real here... there is nothing that he could have said or done under any circumstances that you would approve of.
Doesn't matter what I think. It's amazing how disappointed and deflated the Left is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:36 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,209,436 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Why is that uncalled for? One can assume that his ardent supporters would have loved the speech, empty and pathetic as it was<snip>
You mean just like Palin supporters, like you right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,041 posts, read 22,214,532 times
Reputation: 13855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Really?


Obama Tells Nation Of 'Battle Plan' To Fight Spill : NPR

White House aides say he still supports a tax on carbon, but he didn't mention it last night, an omission that probably disappointed environmentalists.
Oh yeah, a carbon tax will not only help tremendously in cleaning up the oil being discharged into the Gulf and washing up on the shore, but it will also stimulate the economy and create jobs, woo-hoo!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:38 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,041 posts, read 22,214,532 times
Reputation: 13855
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
You mean just like Palin supporters, like you right?
So you have reduced it down to equating the president to an ex-governor and Fox News contributor?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:40 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,041 posts, read 22,214,532 times
Reputation: 13855
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Come on, let's be real here... there is nothing that he could have said or done under any circumstances that you would approve of.
55 days ago, that is when this speech should have been given. But even at that time it would have been a very poor speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,041 posts, read 22,214,532 times
Reputation: 13855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Feel free to look up a transcript of the speech.
Did you? One quarter of the speech was devoted to clean energy, and another quarter was about religion and praying. I think he devote more time to “The Blessing of the Fleet,” then he did to how he planned on cleaning up the oil. Good grief, this was a very bad speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:47 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,913,054 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Did you? One quarter of the speech was devoted to clean energy, and another quarter was about religion and praying. I think he devote more time to “The Blessing of the Fleet,” then he did to how he planned on cleaning up the oil. Good grief, this was a very bad speech.
No, I didn't read a transcript, but I watched the speech. My comment about a transcript was in response to someone who didn't believe what NPR said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top