Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is only prudent that these fisherman be provided respiratory protection and encouraged to use it. Instead, they have not only NOT been provided respiratory protection, they have been threatened with being fired for using their own respiratory protection.
C'mon out, all of you little brainless BP defenders and explain way this one. We know you are here because we read all of you lame brained posts on this subject all the time.
It is only prudent that these fisherman be provided respiratory protection and encouraged to use it. Instead, they have not only NOT been provided respiratory protection, they have been threatened with being fired for using their own respiratory protection.
C'mon out, all of you little brainless BP defenders and explain way this one. We know you are here because we read all of you lame brained posts on this subject all the time.
Actually it makes lots of sense. If I use my own respiratory gear to clean up your mess, and my respiratory gear isnt sufficient, YOU can be sued for my life long injuries.. There are FEDERAL standards that much be complied with..
It is only prudent that these fisherman be provided respiratory protection and encouraged to use it. Instead, they have not only NOT been provided respiratory protection, they have been threatened with being fired for using their own respiratory protection.
C'mon out, all of you little brainless BP defenders and explain way this one. We know you are here because we read all of you lame brained posts on this subject all the time.
First order of business: Who on this forum do you consider to be "BP defenders?"
I've seen Obama critics, Bush critics, animal-lovers, and general oil-spill disgust, but I don't recall seeing anyone defending BP's practices. Do tell?
Actually it makes lots of sense. If I use my own respiratory gear to clean up your mess, and my respiratory gear isnt sufficient, YOU can be sued for my life long injuries.. There are FEDERAL standards that much be complied with..
Now this makes more sense. Good going federal government, once again making it less efficient and more bureaucratic to fix this mess.
Actually it makes lots of sense. If I use my own respiratory gear to clean up your mess, and my respiratory gear isnt sufficient, YOU can be sued for my life long injuries.. There are FEDERAL standards that much be complied with..
You must realize that I am compelled to ask this question...
Why doesn't BP supply needed federally approved protective gear?
It is only prudent that these fisherman be provided respiratory protection and encouraged to use it. Instead, they have not only NOT been provided respiratory protection, they have been threatened with being fired for using their own respiratory protection.
C'mon out, all of you little brainless BP defenders and explain way this one. We know you are here because we read all of you lame brained posts on this subject all the time.
You must realize that I am compelled to ask this question...
Why doesn't BP supply needed federally approved protective gear?
Thats a valid question, which leads me to ask, who is responsible for providing the gear? BP, who is responsible for stopping the leak, or the federal government who holds liability for the cleanup?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.