Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-25-2010, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,961 posts, read 22,143,591 times
Reputation: 13797

Advertisements

House Passes Campaign Finance Disclose Act - US News and World Report

"After a January Supreme Court decision allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money sponsoring campaign ads, Democrats crafted legislation in both chambers that would require stricter methods of campaign finance disclosure.

The bill has come under fire recently for carve-outs. In response to pressure from the NRA, House Democrats made an amendment last week to exempt organizations that have over 1 million members, have been in existence for at least a decade, and receive less than 15 percent of their funding from corporations."


So a targeted suppression of freedom of speech rights?

What happened to the First Amendment which says, "Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech"?

Companies that are granted government contracts or received TARP bailout money will be banned from political speech. Now we know why these democrats love bailouts, it allows an endless stream of new laws with retroactive penalties.

Hell, even the ACLU is coming out against this unconstitutional act. You cannot write a law, and then carve out exclusions for this person but not that person, and this group, but not that group base on their profits or how much funding they receive from private corporations. Then unions and even the NRA are granted exclusions, (in exchange for the NRA dropping its opposition to the campaign-finance reform bill).

Gun Owners of America: "Apparently it's ok to 'carve out' a little free speech if you're in the role of the 'elitists.' But the misguided NRA exemption will leave millions and millions of gun owners and sportsmen belonging to dozens of different organizations out in the cold."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2010, 03:18 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828
Of course. No surprise there. Few people recall when the Obama campaign supressed free speech in Missouri and hired state officials and law enforcement to intimitate those with opposing views. Just more suppression of freedom of speech by Obama and his minions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2010, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,961 posts, read 22,143,591 times
Reputation: 13797
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Of course. No surprise there. Few people recall when the Obama campaign supressed free speech in Missouri and hired state officials and law enforcement to intimitate those with opposing views. Just more suppression of freedom of speech by Obama and his minions.
Notice how these democrats want to always carve out exclusions in their legislation for the largest contributors to democrats - unions; first health care exclusions, now Disclose Act speech exclusions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 12:00 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,261,277 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Notice how these democrats want to always carve out exclusions in their legislation for the largest contributors to democrats - unions; first health care exclusions, now Disclose Act speech exclusions.
You should have added unions, the AARP and a couple of other who don't have to disclose their contributions to make this thing look as bad as it is.

I am hoping that the Dems can't push this through the Senate since many of their people (34) are up for re-election this fall and would certainly not win if they vote for something as bad as this.

I wonder how many libs here understand what has happened to freedom of speech in this law that leaves all the loopholes for some and none for others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 12:14 AM
 
Location: east of my daughter-north of my son
1,928 posts, read 3,644,576 times
Reputation: 888
Business as usual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top