Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I didn't say they were dire, and neither did Angle. You just did, though. Are you trying to instigate violence?
She didn't encourage anything.
If you want to have a legitimate conversation, let me know. As long as you're going to ignore the woman's words and instead harp and whine about what she didn't say, then you're about as useful as a square marble.
By the way, if you're not a Nevada resident, you have no say in whether or not she's elected anyway. If you really want to waste your time and stress about something you have zero control over, knock yourself out. Seems kind of silly to me, though. I am a Nevada resident, however, and I do have a say in whether or not she's elected. When Reid is tossed out of office in November, you can thank me.
First, YOU said that if things continue the way they are that "armed revolution" could happen. "Armed revolution" certainly indicates that circumstances are dire, IMO.
Angle certainly did ENCOURAGE people who want to believe that an armed revolution COULD HAPPEN, just by those words she referenced from Jefferson in connection with the 2nd Amendment. YOU got the message I'm sure. Sounds like you intend to vote for her. That's just what a politician would want to follow statements like that.
And then you reach the point of being patronizing and name calling. Cute. I'm impressed.....not. "Harp" and "whine"???
Nobody is ignoring Angle's words and what they meant other than those who support her, and I suspect that's because they don't want to come out on the Internet and made a direct statement that they would like to see "armed revolution" because they are unhappy with what the majority of people want.
First, YOU said that if things continue the way they are that "armed revolution" could happen. "Armed revolution" certainly indicates that circumstances are dire, IMO.
I also said - in the same sentence - that "we're nowhere near that point."
I'm not sure what your point was, delirious. You edited my post and bolded something *I* wrote, not what Angle said. Were you just confused? Were you trying to make something out of what I said? Or maybe you were intentionally trying to falsely attribute what I wrote to Angle?
Do you disagree? That is, do you believe that a revolution/civil war cannot take place for any reason, from now until the end of civilization?
Just trying to get a handle on what you were trying to say. Looks to me like you were either confused or intentionally attributing my words to Angle, but I'll leave the clarification of your words up to you. That's how adults do it - they don't defend Chris Matthews telling lies about it.
Oh, my God. Nice try. In this post and in the last one you completely parrot what Angle said and agree with it -- all the while pretending she didnt say it. As for the bolding, I used your own line about bolding to highlight a different part of your post. Sorry if it was confusing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When Reid is tossed out of office in November, you can thank me. 
