Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Raise voting age to 30?
Yes! The 20 somethings don't know what they're voting for 23 18.55%
No 86 69.35%
Maybe raise it to 21? 15 12.10%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-30-2010, 06:39 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,953,749 times
Reputation: 12828

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid2001 View Post
Yeah, it's called democracy.
Actually we live in a representative Republic and not a Democracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-30-2010, 06:43 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,953,749 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
Make voting mandatory at whatever age.

Age has no correlation to intelligence.

Age to enter the service should match voting and drinking age.

Should be some basic test before allowing people to vote.

There must be a guarantee service men and women have their votes counted!!

Otherwise we get the minority dominating the majority.
Mandatory voting goes directly against the grain of freedom and understanding that with freedom comes responsibility.

Basic tests before allowing people to vote should be proof of citizenship, period and photo ID.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2010, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Arlington, VA
5,412 posts, read 4,242,747 times
Reputation: 916
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanst530 View Post
I myself am in my 20s and think we are not cut out to make decisions that risk the fate of the country. I know how people my age think and it's scary. Most of my age group is full of wanna be hippies... Free everything, and easy living.

I know there is an exception to this generalization, but for the most part it seems most are not informed enough about long term consequences of their votes.
YOu think older people aren't idiots?

If you aren't allowed to vote, you shouldn't have to pay taxes then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2010, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
7,185 posts, read 4,771,925 times
Reputation: 4869
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanst530 View Post
I myself am in my 20s and think we are not cut out to make decisions that risk the fate of the country. I know how people my age think and it's scary. Most of my age group is full of wanna be hippies... Free everything, and easy living.

I know there is an exception to this generalization, but for the most part it seems most are not informed enough about long term consequences of their votes.
Let's see. You claim you're in your 20's yet you're talking about "wanna be hippies"? I am beyond skeptical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2010, 09:37 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,759,378 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuburnAL View Post
Min.

Some folks will win the lottery, have a relative give them the money, or some other thing, but most will have to work some overtime, save for a few months, or a year, or two, or do something else that demonstrates they can plan ahead and have good decision making. This would have the benefit of weeding out a lot of folks who make bad decisions from the voting process as well as encouraging a lot of Americans to keep a bare minimum of savings.

I think this makes a lot more sense than a property requirement as many American "home owners" have less than 50% equity in their homes, and it never seemed like a solid system in the old days either to me as a merchant who owned a ship couldn't vote if he didn't own land even though his ship may have been worth more than the holdings of many landowners.
I don't think anyone would save more just so they can vote every couple of years.
Anyway, I don't think that requirement makes sense. There are so many reasons why people have no savings. Some have lost their jobs, others had no or inappropriate health insurance and spent all their money on an operation...
Those limitations always are also a bit arbitrary. Why $5000 or $10000?

When you argue that having savings proves planning, good decision-making etc., not being allowed to vote may be considered a kind of punishment for things that are not against the law. I wonder what courts have to say about that If you argue that they lack the skills to plan ahead and make right decisions, they might use that as an excuse when committing crimes.

In the West the only restriction these days is age, and that only because of the fact that children and kids are by law not adults. The age at which one is old enough to take full responsibility of one's life is where sciences such as psychology have agreed on due to experience. In Germany some states have even lowered the age to 16 for local elections.

Are mentally handicapped people allowed to vote? This is a serious question
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2010, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,220,032 times
Reputation: 4258
Raise the voting age to 30?

Maybe lower the age of actual education. Start teaching government in grade school, with further classes every year. Kids catch on real fast. Raise the requirements to move from one grade to another or even graduate from high school. Better yet, increase the requirements for a college degree to something like finding Brazil on a map.

If nothing else, it would increase the work pool for call centers in the U.S.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2010, 10:13 AM
 
4,049 posts, read 5,033,972 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by lorrysda View Post
Reread my statement. I qualified with "...stay around for a few centuries..."
How long have racism, sexism, false propaganda and aversion to technology been around?

Besides, this started when you disputed my first post where I was stating how old people tend to have outdated and fallacious ideas and shouldn't be the only ones who vote. I elaborated on this after you disputed it and you come back with this dodge. My post was not just about ideas that have been around for a few centuries, and you were responding to my post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2010, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Springfield VA
4,036 posts, read 9,249,535 times
Reputation: 1522
Really? While ideally every voter should be well informed but most aren't. Voting is a civil right and shouldn't be granted or taken away because some folks in their 20s are idiots. There are so dumb 30 year olds too. Trust me I know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2010, 10:26 AM
 
Location: southwestern USA
1,823 posts, read 2,128,476 times
Reputation: 2440
I find a lot of 18 year olds to be misinformed or misguided. That being said, I also find a lot of 40 and 50 olds to be exactly the same way.

If an eighteen year can drive a car, smoke, legally marry, and serve in the military than he can be afforded the opportunity to vote. I would hope some 18 year olds be do more reading rather than social networking, texting, or racking up 6000 minutes on their cell phones. Part of that responsibility can be tagged on their parents who have allowed them for years to avoid partaking in serious issues in lieu of costing the family an extra million bucks a month on texting.

However, to take the vote away from 18 year olds due to lack of depth would be foolish----as I have previously noted that my daily observations reveal that not a whole lot of adults understand current events and are more interested in reality tv and staying afloat.

This raises the specter of the general dumbing down of America----it is a universal problem affecting both the young and adults. I have a lot to learn myself so I am not immune. However,the problem of ignorance and avoidance is becoming a huge national disgrace and doesnt show signs of changing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2010, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,619,498 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Actually we live in a representative Republic and not a Democracy.
We are both a Republic and a Democracy.

One does not preclude the other. There are many democracies that have a monarch as the head of state (e.g. Britain, Canada, the Antipodes, Spain, the Netherlands, Sweden, etc.) Likewise there are many republics that are VERY undemocratic. (e.g. North Korea, Zimbabwe, Cuba, Iran, and too many others to name). We happen to be both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top