Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-09-2010, 01:03 PM
 
301 posts, read 404,377 times
Reputation: 133

Advertisements

I still don't exactly know why the Bush Admin went to Iraq. Could someone please explain to me the incentives behind the decision? Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-09-2010, 01:08 PM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,230,026 times
Reputation: 9628
To secure the world's largest oil fields and isolate both Iran and Syria by driving a wedge between them. It was a brilliant strategic move, but it will be very hard to consolidate the gains without the support of the US public. In the end, the American people will win or lose the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq by either perservering or giving up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2010, 01:16 PM
 
8,289 posts, read 13,583,766 times
Reputation: 5019
Actually Iraq had no Weapons of Mass Destruction and it's invasion was pre meditated by the Neo Cons
Welcome to the Project for the New American Century

To those who served in Iraq or died your Government lied to you.
By the way 9/11 didn't happen because they "hate" us for our freedoms! Stop messing with the world and maybe they won't mess with you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2010, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,833 posts, read 19,532,517 times
Reputation: 9632
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiRob View Post
Actually Iraq had no Weapons of Mass Destruction and it's invasion was pre meditated by the Neo Cons
Welcome to the Project for the New American Century

To those who served in Iraq or died your Government lied to you.
and the neo-con, got the idea from Brzezinski...the puppetier of carter/bush1/clinton/bush2 and obama

and yes Iraq did have WMD....we gave it to them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2010, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,833 posts, read 19,532,517 times
Reputation: 9632
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthBeautyGoodness View Post
I still don't exactly know why the Bush Admin went to Iraq. Could someone please explain to me the incentives behind the decision? Thanks.
the same reason that clinton made it US POLICY to change the regeme in Iraq


Regime change in Iraq has been official US policy since 1998. The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, signed into law by President Clinton, states:

"It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime."

Iraq Liberation Act of 1998
105th Congress, 2nd Session
September 29, 1998
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2010, 02:11 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,832,243 times
Reputation: 4896
Oil. Sadam was the pusher to america's addiction and by taking out the middle man, big oil profits went through the roof. Bush also wanted Sadam dead as "he tried to kill my daddy"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2010, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,732,065 times
Reputation: 9981
Oil was $22 a barrel and Chevrons quarterly profit was $3 billion. If the embargo on Iraq was dropped Sadaam would have flooded the market to pay off $92 billion he owed Russia and France. That would have driven the price down to $18 wiping out the profits of US Oil Companies. The plan was to destroy Iraqs ability to sell oil

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2010, 02:17 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,662 posts, read 3,833,983 times
Reputation: 580
Congress voted on the bipartisan Iraq war resolution -- Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, Public Law No: 107-243 . . . but my guess is that the OP has little interest in actual facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 08:37 AM
 
59,324 posts, read 27,487,371 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by LNTT_Vacationer View Post
Congress voted on the bipartisan Iraq war resolution -- Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, Public Law No: 107-243 . . . but my guess is that the OP has little interest in actual facts.
2d Session
S. J. RES. 45
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
September 26, 2002


Mr. DASCHLE (for himself and Mr. LOTT) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read the first time
September 30, 2002

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

JOINT RESOLUTION
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Whereas Congress in 1998 concluded that Iraq was then in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations and thereby threatened the vital interests of the United States and international peace and security, stated the reasons for that conclusion, and urged the President to take appropriate action to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations (Public Law 105-235);
Whereas Iraq remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations, thereby continuing to threaten the national security interests of the United States and international peace and security;
Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolutions of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population, including the Kurdish peoples, thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;
Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people;
Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;
Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;
Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of American citizens;
Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, underscored the gravity of the threat that Iraq will transfer weapons of mass destruction to international terrorist organizations;
Whereas the United States has the inherent right, as acknowledged in the United Nations Charter, to use force in order to defend itself;
Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the high risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify the use of force by the United States in order to defend itself;
Whereas Iraq is in material breach of its disarmament and other obligations under United Nations Security Council Resolution 687, to cease repression of its civilian population that threatens international peace and security under United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, and to cease threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq under United Nations Security Council Resolution 949, and United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 authorizes use of all necessary means to compel Iraq to comply with these `subsequent relevant resolutions';
Whereas Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) has authorized the President to use the Armed Forces of the United States to achieve full implementation of Security Council Resolutions 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677, pursuant to Security Council Resolution 678;
Whereas Congress in section 1095 of Public Law 102-190 has stated that it `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq (Public Law 102-1),' that Iraq's repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and `constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region,' and that Congress `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of Resolution 688';
Whereas Congress in the Iraq Liberation Act (Public Law 105-338) has expressed its sense that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;
Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40); and
Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to use force in order to defend the national security interests of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
  • Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

  • This joint resolution may be cited as the `Further Resolution on Iraq'.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

  • The President is authorized to use all means that he determines to be appropriate, including force, in order to enforce the United Nations Security Council Resolutions referenced above, defend the national security interests of the United States against the threat posed by Iraq, and restore international peace and security in the region.
Calendar No. 618
107th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. J. RES. 45
JOINT RESOLUTION
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 08:43 AM
 
646 posts, read 394,739 times
Reputation: 129
the bush administration went to iraq? actually, the military did, and a ton of democrats voted for it. that aside, we went to iraq for no reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top