Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-28-2013, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

The economy has become more unequal under Obama. "For four and a half years, Mr. Obama has focused his policies on reducing inequality rather than increasing growth," the Journal notes. "The predictable result has been more inequality and less growth." The rich have done well; the middle class has struggled.

Middle class incomes have fallen under Obama. The Journal points out that median real household income has fallen by 5%--not just since the start of the recession under George W. Bush, but also since the start of the economy recovery in 2009, for which Obama and the Democrats have often claimed sole credit.
The administration has constantly failed to meet promises of faster growth. Contrary to Obama's cherry-picked statistics in his recent speech, the Journal reminds readers that the Obama recovery is "one of the weakest on record," despite repeated rosy projections by the White House and the media of fast growth.

Obama has made entitlements are a drag on the middle class. The Journal focuses on ObamaCare, which has hurt job creation and created uncertainty. It could have also mentioned the failing state of Social Security and Medicare, which Obama has failed to reform, and the future cost of Obama's staggering debt.

Even Obama's few pro-growth initiatives are not serious. Despite the Journal's early, enthusiastic support for immigration reform as an engine for expansion, the authors of the editorial finally admit: "we're not sure [Obama] wants even that to pass...he may be setting it up to use as a campaign wedge in 2014."

WSJ: Obama Worst President for Middle Class 'in Modern Times'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-28-2013, 07:57 PM
 
17,440 posts, read 9,268,656 times
Reputation: 11907
I guess you missed the part about the election of 2012 ....... there is a substantial portion of the USA who actually "like" all this. That's the problem that should be addressed.

Obama is Obama, he is all about Obama ...... everyone knows this ...... and they still don't care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 08:20 PM
 
2,861 posts, read 3,851,013 times
Reputation: 2351
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,538,911 times
Reputation: 24780
Smile Obama's devastating attack on the middle class

Darn that Obama!

Devastator and attacker!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
Median household income , adjusted for inflation, has been declining since 2000.

Median Household Income History in the United States

I would not expect to see a substantial increase in median income, adjusted for inflation, for a long, long time, regardless of who is sitting the oval or holds the majority of the house or senate because of the aging population.

10,000 people a day began turning 65 in 2010. This trend is expected to continue for the next 20 years.

Last edited by middle-aged mom; 07-28-2013 at 10:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
I think this is the source WSJ article as opposed to the Breibart editorial:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323610704578626142861572144.html

It appears the WSJ did not adjust their $ for inflation. Median income, adjusted for inflation has been declining since 2000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 10:29 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,856,573 times
Reputation: 18304
Obama did not start it; its been going on since Mid 60's under Johson. The wealth sharing in reality has meant less skilled workers available. Now they see Mexican illegals as vital to the economy while see more citizens not contributing and becoming dependents in larger numbers.Never listen to what they say ;see what the result so what they do is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 11:47 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
I think this is the source WSJ article as opposed to the Breibart editorial:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323610704578626142861572144.html

It appears the WSJ did not adjust their $ for inflation. Median income, adjusted for inflation has been declining since 2000.


Incomes usually increase when recessions end.

They did in 2005, 2006 and 2007.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 07:02 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Darn that Obama!

Devastator and attacker!


True

Can you please explain the following-

1. incomes decreased 7% under Obama
2. The number of unemployed Americans has increased under Obama
3. personal savings (except for the 1%) have declined under Obama
4. Food stamp usage is up under Obama
5. those Americans living in poverty is up under Obama

Tell me.............................. how has America benefitted from Obama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 10:41 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,698,996 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
I guess you missed the part about the election of 2012 ....... there is a substantial portion of the USA who actually "like" all this. That's the problem that should be addressed.

Obama is Obama, he is all about Obama ...... everyone knows this ...... and they still don't care.
Very true. He's like a kardashian. No talent but he'a pop celebrity. They voted for him because he was entertaining on letterman, they would vote as readily a kardashian.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top