Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Someone tell me, what did the poor and the unwilling to be responsible for themselves do to deserve their handouts? What did they do to deserve wealth redistribution? What did a homeowner who couldn't afford their house to begin with do to deserve to stay in the house and not have it foreclosed on? Is this the most hypocrtical thing ever or what?
Someone tell me, what did the poor and the unwilling to be responsible for themselves do to deserve their handouts?
Seems Barney Frank has an intellectual dishonesty thing going on. If Barney Frank thinks people are only entitled to money because they've done something to deserve it, Barney Frank would then also have to support the abolishment of welfare, medicaid, unemployment, etc.
Yet another stupid, judgementa,l demorat trying to tell other's how they should live their lives and that they should spread any wealth they get to those to lazy to get their own.
Seems Barney Frank has an intellectual dishonesty thing going on. If Barney Frank thinks people are only entitled to money because they've done something to deserve it, Barney Frank would then also have to support the abolishment of welfare, medicaid, unemployment, etc.
I agree. These wackos like Frank, can't even have a solid argument for anything. They are nothing more than sissie hypocrits that want want want, no matter who it hurts or helps.
Yet another stupid, judgementa,l demorat trying to tell other's how they should live their lives and that they should spread any wealth they get to those too lazy to get their own.
Pathetic!
You mean those who "didn't do anything to deserve it." Hint, hint, Barney Frank.
I agree with him, letting fortunes to one's children is like letting privileges, thus wrong in my view. I even think every child and young adult should start out at more or less the same material level, i.e. without a fortune expecting him or her at a certain age.
I agree with him, letting fortunes to one's children is like letting privileges, thus wrong in my view. I even think every child and young adult should start out at more or less the same material level, i.e. without a fortune expecting him or her at a certain age.
Ok Comrade Mao, we know how you think. Answer the question, what did the poor do to deserve what they get? What did a person irresponsible enough to buy a house they couldn't afford do to deserve getting bailed out of that?
so to the "double taxation" crowd, riddle me this:
we obviously need some taxes, so why is income tax considered 'acceptable' to tax, but estate/death taxes are not?
what is it about estate taxes that constitute "unfair redistribution of wealth" and "double taxation", that don't apply to all other taxes?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
