Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
3,644 posts, read 6,310,991 times
Reputation: 1633

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
Why should the rest of the states be on the hook to continually bail out California that insists on providing more and more unfunded benefits that other states do not have?
What are you talking about? I never said they'd get a bailout. I just said they should be able to declare bankruptcy. That means that they are free of their existing obligations. The people that bought the bonds are screwed, just like the sotckholders are in a company that goes bankrupt. It is a risk one takes as an investor. The people expecting (or getting a check from the gov are sol as well. That's what you get for letting government promise you thing they can never afford to pay. All those people getting pensions like it is still the 19050's. Forget it. There is no way a non-government worker should have to pay high taxes so that a government worker can get benefits that no one else gets. I know a cop who retired from the force in Miami after 18 years and is making six figures from his pension. No wonder governments have to keep raising taxes. It is unsubstainable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,847,149 times
Reputation: 6438
Saw this earlier today... good reading

Illinois state income tax hikes hit businesses hard - Jan. 13, 2011

State legislators were faced with two "terrible choices," said Steve Brown, a spokesman for Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, a Democrat. They opted to raise taxes rather than cut spending. Also, as part of the package, lawmakers placed a 2% cap on spending growth and authorized $3.7 billion in borrowing to make a pension payment.

And where I live'.........

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/431861_budget15.html

The spending plan for 2011-13 cuts ferry runs, closes two correctional facilities (McNeil Island Corrections Center and Maple Lane), eliminates the state's health insurance for the poor and stops food stamps for more than 14,000.
Gregoire said her task was made more difficult because 60 percent of the $32 billion, two-year state spending can't be cut, due to federal mandates or other rules. That meant that nearly $5 billion in cuts had to be found from about $14 billion in spending.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:31 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,091,241 times
Reputation: 15038
What a load of BS.

Well cool, amend the bankruptcy laws, scrap the 10th Amendment and place federal courts under the jurisdiction of the state, just for starters.

Of course a fascinating issue would ensue when I Federal judge questions a states financial ability to pay. You see unlike a normal applicant of a bankruptcy proceeding a state can dictate how much it receives in revenue arguing that the state just didn't want to impose higher taxes on its citizens hardly seems like a viable argument to escape paying for one's creditors.

Can't wait to see how this plays out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,631,345 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by brien51 View Post
Why should I pay for California's irresponsibility to meet its own financial obligations born out of fiscal drunken spending and golden pensions that could never possibly be met when they were negotiated with the unions.

California, and its residents, are responsible for their own fiscal matters. No one other than California voted to award these ridiculous financial obligations. They made the wine and now they have to drink it. If it has turned sour, it's not our problem but California's problem alone.

Don't come crying to me for my money to bail their sorry ass out.
What if they threaten to secede if they don't get a bailout? I could easily see the GOP and the tea party getting behind California secession, as that would mean that Obama couldn't be re-elected without the CA electoral votes and without those votes it would be extremely difficult for any Dem to be elected President again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:33 PM
 
Location: NE CT
1,496 posts, read 3,388,670 times
Reputation: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoobleKar View Post
So far anyhow.....the Federal Government isn't about to go into bankruptcy, but certain States are. I presume THAT'S why he doesn't mention the Federal Government.

I imagine however that the way things are "progressing" with the progressives in power, we might have to cross that bridge when we come to it.


Ca & IL are perfect examples of two states that have been run by Progressive liberals for years and years. The results? Well we all see them, no more money to meet the irresponsible obligations they went over the edge with in their promises to society.

Take heed and warning because the fiscal condition of these two states are exactly what will likely happen to the Federal government if it continues down the path of Progressive fiscal irresponsibility. In fact, the Federal government is there right now as we will see when they raise the debt ceiling that almost all those fools in DC said they wouldn't do. Even PBO condemned it when he was in the Senate. Now he sings a different tune..Hypocrites, most of them....

Waiting to cross bridges when we come to them is exactly what put Ca & Il where they are today. There is no waiting. The time is now to cut spending and drastically reduce the size of the government Diplodicus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,581,762 times
Reputation: 24780
Thumbs down Gingrich: middle class h8r

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Interesting he is willing to go after negotiated pensions of states, how about the pensions of US Congressmen.


"As a way to let state governments, and taxpayers, off the hook for paying the trillions in pension benefits they have promised to their workers, presidential hopeful and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has proposed changing federal laws, so that states can go bankrupt. True, state pension plans"


Gingrich Proposes Allowing State Bankruptcies, To Escape Pension Obligations - CBS MoneyWatch.com

Good ol' Newt...

Proposing another big screw the middle class program. He's good at that.

Just think how many trillions we've p*ssed down the drain in Iraq.

The Iraq War Will Cost Us $3 Trillion, and Much More - washingtonpost.com

How many trillions did we send Wall St for Bush's TARP?

Was the Bush TARP Program a Mistake? by Gregory Hilton | The DC World Affairs Blog


Anybody know why we did those? We sure had the money for those big snafus. But anything that favors middle America? Heck no, we can't find the money for anything along those lines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:36 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,131,949 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Interesting he is willing to go after negotiated pensions of states, how about the pensions of US Congressmen.


"As a way to let state governments, and taxpayers, off the hook for paying the trillions in pension benefits they have promised to their workers, presidential hopeful and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has proposed changing federal laws, so that states can go bankrupt. True, state pension plans"


Gingrich Proposes Allowing State Bankruptcies, To Escape Pension Obligations - CBS MoneyWatch.com

That would affect him, so it's out of the question.

What a freaking tool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Oxygen Ln. AZ
9,319 posts, read 18,761,614 times
Reputation: 5764
The states have simply spent too much money and made too many promises to union employees. If we are to redistribute the wealth as our president promised to do, then the extremely fat pensions should be a target as well as the rest of the tax burdened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:40 PM
 
Location: NE CT
1,496 posts, read 3,388,670 times
Reputation: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
What a load of BS.

Well cool, amend the bankruptcy laws, scrap the 10th Amendment and place federal courts under the jurisdiction of the state, just for starters.

Of course a fascinating issue would ensue when I Federal judge questions a states financial ability to pay. You see unlike a normal applicant of a bankruptcy proceeding a state can dictate how much it receives in revenue arguing that the state just didn't want to impose higher taxes on its citizens hardly seems like a viable argument to escape paying for one's creditors.

Can't wait to see how this plays out.
They don't have to go to bankruptcy court. They simply have to raise their taxes and meet their obligations by cutting the size of their bloated government that placed them in this position in the first place. Let CA & Il be responsible for their own elected officals misue of the people's money. If that means rasining taxes and shrinking gov't, so be it. They made their own bed now it is time to lie in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:41 PM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,741,161 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbacon View Post
What are you talking about? I never said they'd get a bailout. I just said they should be able to declare bankruptcy. That means that they are free of their existing obligations. The people that bought the bonds are screwed, just like the sotckholders are in a company that goes bankrupt. It is a risk one takes as an investor. The people expecting (or getting a check from the gov are sol as well. That's what you get for letting government promise you thing they can never afford to pay. All those people getting pensions like it is still the 19050's. Forget it. There is no way a non-government worker should have to pay high taxes so that a government worker can get benefits that no one else gets. I know a cop who retired from the force in Miami after 18 years and is making six figures from his pension. No wonder governments have to keep raising taxes. It is unsubstainable.
You took my post wrong. I am in AGREEMENT with you. They should go bankrupt INSTEAD of receiving a bailout from the Federal Govt that comes from taxes collected from other states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top