the birther bills (McCain, carry, elect, states)

[Calvinist]

Originally Posted by wrecking ball

but can you see why it's unconstitutional?

i have no problem with asking for proof of eligibility, as long as it's constitutional.

I don't see it as unconstitutional

[dcsldcd]

I not only think these bills are important, I believe they should have always been the law for anyone wanting to hold the office of president, vice president and speaker of the house.

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by Calvinist

I don't see it as unconstitutional

you don't see how refusing a current COLB because it's not an "original long-form" violates the "full faith and credit" clause?

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by dcsldcd

I not only think these bills are important, I believe they should have always been the law for anyone wanting to hold the office of president, ......

you didn't want reagan to be president?

[dcsldcd]

Originally Posted by wrecking ball

you don't see how refusing a current COLB because it's not an "original long-form" violates the "full faith and credit" clause?

I think we have lost full faith and credit in our government. Obviously the left have no convidence hussein obama is a natural born citizen and will not be able to pass the smell test. EVERYONE should have to prove their status before being able to be president. I always assumed they were, silly me.

Long form birth certificate, naming the time, weight, length, hospital, doctor, mother, father and all other info normally found on the long form.

[highcotton]

It will keep scumbag frauds like Obozo from occupying the White House and destroying the U.S.

[dcsldcd]

Originally Posted by wrecking ball

you didn't want reagan to be president?

Hmmm, I was not aware this thread was about Reagan. Do you have a question about the topic?

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by CoastalMaine

Which is exactly what I said.

Actually, no. That is nothing even vaguely similar to what you said.

You said they were "playing to their state constitutions." But they can't do that, since they are creating new eligibility requirements for the office of the presidency that do not exist in the US Constitution... i.e. they are attempting to amend it.

This is why most of them are DOA.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Calvinist

I don't see it as unconstitutional

Then you're not looking very close.

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by dcsldcd

Hmmm, I was not aware this thread was about Reagan. Do you have a question about the topic?

the thread is about presidential eligibility bills. pick your president. current, former or future.

i mentioned reagan because he could not have met the requirements in most of these bills.