Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2011, 02:15 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,564,185 times
Reputation: 29289

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
At least you're being honest in your anti-immigration stance then.
my anti-illegal immigration stance, you mean?

because i don't recall calling for a complete ban on legal immigration..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2011, 02:16 PM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,403,372 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
Canada doesn't do it. Why should we?
Canada has universal health care. Why shouldn't we do that?

I'm not arguing about what Canada could or should do, I'm discussing what the US should or could do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2011, 02:16 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,455,215 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
You have so completely missed my point it's astounding.

Our laws should provide some sort of accomodation for the millions of unskilled laborers to be able to immigrate to this country legally.



And yet we have millions of illegal immigrants who are able to find work. Why not have some means of allowing more legal immigrants, when there is obviously demand for low-wage unskilled labor in our country?



It must be easy for you to win arguments, since you only argue against the blatant strawmen you set up for yourself.

I said that immigration made us great. It is harder to immigrate here than it was in the past. In fact, for many people it is literally impossible to immigrate here legally. We should make it easier for people who want to, to immigrate here legally. In no way was I making the argument you've ascribed to me.

I know what you said and what you meant. But you also made it seem that it was OK that illegals came here becuase it was hard for them to come here. Oh poor wittle thems............ Life is tough sometimes aint it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2011, 02:19 PM
 
9,240 posts, read 8,669,503 times
Reputation: 2225
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
there is no such number as 'too many' in some people's minds, unfortunately.
lol


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2011, 02:20 PM
 
5,915 posts, read 4,813,813 times
Reputation: 1398
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
Canada has universal health care. Why shouldn't we do that?

I'm not arguing about what Canada could or should do, I'm discussing what the US should or could do.
Okay, we have the H-2 visa program. What else do you want?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2011, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,210,859 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
We are a nation of immigrants. Closing the doors in the face of those who want a better life for themselves and their families goes against one of the most important things that made us great!

Listen, you cannot have immigration and socialism at the same time. You cannot have open immigration to free healthcare and welfare. You can't even have open-immigration to a federally mandated minimum wage. If you had completely free immigration to these things, this country would be completely swamped.


If you want open-immigration like it was in the past. You need to revert the state of this country to the times of the past.


Lets pretend you wanted to come to America today from Mexico, what do you have to do? Well, you would have to apply for some kind of VISA, most likely either a work visa or a tourist visa. Without either of these, you cannot step foot in America. You cannot legally work in this country without permission from the US government. You cannot visit your family who lives here without permission from the US government.

So if you aren't highly educated, if you don't have lots of money, or you aren't married to an American citizen, you are basically never going to even see the inside of the United States unless you sneak in.



Now lets pretend you wanted to come to America 150 years ago, how would you do it? You would just come to America. The individual states either let you stay, or they kicked you out. There were thousands upon thousands of people that lived in the states that were just "free men", mostly coming as laborers or as indentured servants. And would live here for years and years before they become citizens(and many never became citizens).

But what did citizenship do back then? The states were basically sovereign nations, and they passed their own laws dealing with citizens and non-citizens. If a state had laws that basically made citizens and non-citizens equal, then there was never actually any purpose to become a citizen of that state. The only purpose for citizenship 150 years ago, was that citizenship in one state effectively made you a citizen of all the states. Allowing you to move from one state to another legally, allowing you equal protection to all other citizens in each of the states. So citizenship itself was only necessary if you wanted to go from one state to another. And that is why the federal government was given control over the naturalization process, because an American citizen was basically given access to all the states. And the idea was to allow California to largely control its own immigration, and for Texas to control its immigration, and Arizona to control its immigration, by allowing each to decide who was allowed to stay and who had to go.


If we still had the same type of immigration and governmental structure of 150 years ago. There would be no federal government entity called "INS". The states would be enforcing immigration, the states would be responsible for expelling non-citizens. And at any time every single state could allow as many non-citizens(illegal immigrants) in their state as they wanted. But those non-citizens living in California could simply not move to other states, unless they became actual citizens of this country. Which could only happen if they met the criteria set forth by the Congress(similar to how it is now).



And let me repeat, you cannot have open-immigration to welfare and free healthcare. But as I said before, the states could allow as many foreigners to live in their states as they want. They could even create a sort of psuedo-citizenship for the immigrants that didn't meet federal requirements for US citizenship but are living and working in their state, to provide them with benefits. That way if California wanted to provide all its non-citizens free educations, free healthcare, and welfare, it could. It could also choose to only provide those things to certain non-citizens. Or it might choose to only provide those things to actual American citizens.

The problem is, the only way to stay in this country is to become a citizen of this country. And that allows you to go anywhere you want in this country. And under our current system, if California wants to allow more immigrants. Then those uneducated, poor, non-english speaking people might end up in Iowa, and the federal government would require Iowa to take care of them, by our generous welfare system. And because of our federal income tax, corporate tax, etc. Certain states(like New York) might be forced to basically subsidize the generous California welfare system.


If you de-federalized our country, we would all be much better off.

Last edited by Redshadowz; 02-14-2011 at 04:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2011, 03:16 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,447,268 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd View Post
I think we need to make the liberals unconstitutional and deport them to whatever country they want to destroy. Arizona should sue the feds who are costing their state billions every year by not upholding our laws and securing the border.

Thanks for making good sense. I agree with you i do also have realitives who live in Arizona, a no win situation, and a border problem out of control. I don't blame Arizona one bit for wanting to sue the hek out of the feds who are costing that State billions, becauce of this illegal nusiance of a problem. What is it going to take before we take this border control problem seriously. A all out war. This is what it is going to boil down to, unless a all out war escalates with us, nothing will ever get accomplished, how they use this to their benefit, is not funny or a joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 07:13 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,168,625 times
Reputation: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
I agree with you here. The fact that our immigration policy has significant deficiencies which screw over millions of people does not give people from other countries the right to blatantly disregard our immigration laws.

All I'm saying is that when people say "my grandparents came here legally, why can't they?" it's a facetious and fallacious argument. The immigration laws today are different than they were back then. It is a LOT harder to immigrate to the US these days, and as I've pointed out, for millions it is impossible. It is one of many things that immigration reform will need to address.



Let me know when you figure out that there is at least one country that separates Sweden and Switzerland, because once again you manage to completely miss the point, my ignorant friend.
If you think it was easy for a Jewish couple who are aged 20 and 26, to get permission to immigrate to the U.S., from Russia in the 1920's, think again. It's MUCH easier to sneak across the border from mexico than it was was to get permission to leave Mother Russia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top