Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-22-2011, 12:51 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,132,449 times
Reputation: 3241

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Wouldn't surprise me at all. I've read the Constitution many times (as well as many Supreme Court decisions cover to cover).



As a medical procedure - sure. I've looked at the statistics before, and I don't have them in front of me, but it's something like circumcisions are medically necessary in 1 out of 100,0000 or 200,000 male children.
They don't HAVE to be medically necessary. That's not a test that is applied.

Quote:
A vast, vast, vast majority of circumcisions (99%+ probably) are not medical in nature - they are religious or cosmetic or out of tradition (routed in Christian purity whether the parent realizes that or not) - not sufficient reason, in my evaluation, to override my fundamental rights of privacy and liberty over my own physical self.

A right your parents get to express when you are a minor. Again, that's the point.

So don't circumcize your kids. What business is it of yours if OTHERS do?

 
Old 02-22-2011, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
You're right. There is a health issue. The foreskin is a functioning body part necessary for optimal sexual health. Removing it is harmful to the health of men.
not even going to touch that one

the foreskin is better removed for sanitary sake
 
Old 02-22-2011, 12:52 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,132,449 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
You're right. There is a health issue. The foreskin is a functioning body part necessary for optimal sexual health. Removing it is harmful to the health of men.
No, and no.

It's about as functional as an eyebrow.

And I would love to see your definition of "optimal sexual health."

Whatever the hell that means.
 
Old 02-22-2011, 12:58 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,103,566 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
No, and no.

It's about as functional as an eyebrow.

And I would love to see your definition of "optimal sexual health."

Whatever the hell that means.
Maybe we should cut those off our kids too then
 
Old 02-22-2011, 12:59 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,103,566 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post

the foreskin is better removed for sanitary sake
Um, no. That's just simply not the case.
 
Old 02-22-2011, 12:59 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,132,449 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Maybe we should cut those off our kids too then
If it were aesthetically and socially acceptable to do so, then...


Hey wait, people ALREADY DO THIS. Remember that chick from the Thompson Twins?

No eyebrows.
 
Old 02-22-2011, 01:00 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,132,449 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Um, no. That's just simply not the case.
yes it is.

It may not be medically significant, but it is easier to clean when you don't have to unroll a turtleneck.

Don't make me draw you a picture.
 
Old 02-22-2011, 01:01 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,103,566 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
If it were aesthetically and socially acceptable to do so, then...
...it would still be a violation of my fundamental right to privacy and liberty over my own physical self.
 
Old 02-22-2011, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,138 posts, read 5,804,991 times
Reputation: 7706
I knew a guy who had to be circumcised as an adult.
Boy did he wish it had been done when he was an infant.

Me, I'm glad I had it done and so is my son.
 
Old 02-22-2011, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
It's about as functional as an eyebrow.
Eye-lids would be a better comparison, serving a similar function.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top