Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2011, 04:08 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,825,522 times
Reputation: 4896

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
I actually started another thread on that on Friday. They will probably put forth more petitions by the end of the week, with likely more coming before the May 2nd deadline. Looks like the elections will be held in June or July.

Walker's recall efforts wouldn't be able to start until Jan, which would put his election (if he were to be recalled) likely next April or May.
It would be nice to have Walker recalled now, but it's actually a good thing the people of wisconsin have to wait until next year. Having walker thrown out of office in the heat of campaign season is going to deliver a devastating blow to the GOP and tea party
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2011, 04:12 PM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,487,092 times
Reputation: 1356
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
They are already getting a data base of people to contact for signatures in November.

Almost 200,000 in the data base. About 500,000 signatures needed.

Pledge to Recall Scott Walker and Rebecca Kleefisch | UnitedWisconsin.com

Seems to me that Walker was elected Governor to take care of the financial problems in Wisconsin.


Now, Democrats all over the country are trying to tell the voters of one state that they must stand down and give in to the Left's demands.


Ain't gonna happen.




Cry, Cry, Cry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 04:15 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,124 posts, read 44,928,596 times
Reputation: 13732
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Nazi had the same beliefs that you do about unions. That is why they killed unions. Trade unions and workers' rights did not bode well with their political agenda.
I'm not sure why you think that. Look again at the Nazi Party platform:

- We ask that the government undertake the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunities for employment and earning a living.
- The activities of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests of the community, but must take place within its confines and for the good of all. Therefore, we demand:...an end to the power of the financial interests.
- We demand profit sharing in big business.
- We demand a broad extension of care for the aged.
- We demand...the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of the national, state and municipal governments.
- In order to make possible to every capable and industrious [citizen] the attainment of higher education and thus the achievement of a post of leadership, the government must provide an all-around enlargement of our entire system of public education
- The government must undertake the improvement of public health
- [We] combat the...materialistic spirit within and without us, and are convinced that a permanent recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of The Common Good Before the Individual Good
(Source: Der Nationalsozialismus Dokumente 1933-1945, edited by Walther Hofer, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Bucherei, 1957, pp. 29-31)

The Nazi Party platform is very much in line with union ideology, which is exactly why the Nazi government fostered a national union.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 04:34 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,124 posts, read 44,928,596 times
Reputation: 13732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
Seems to me that Walker was elected Governor to take care of the financial problems in Wisconsin.
Exactly.

For whatever reason, Dems and unions want WI residents to have to pay higher taxes. Would love to see them explain that.

Quote:
Now, Democrats all over the country are trying to tell the voters of one state that they must stand down and give in to the Left's demands.


Ain't gonna happen.
Well, we'll just have to see if the WI residents are stupid enough to be duped by the Dems and the unions. If they are, it'll only last until the impending "Oh, crap! What have we done? We just screwed ourselves!" moment when they get their ever-skyrocketing tax bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 05:19 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,356,684 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Um... that's EXACTLY what it is when the government collects the public employee union dues, and pays the unions back for their political support with sweetheart salary and benefits deals that are gouging the taxpayers and are financially unsustainable.
Yet MORE ignorance on your part.
If you twisted reality any more you'd be able to look out your own mouth.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,851,772 times
Reputation: 10791
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Exactly.

For whatever reason, Dems and unions want WI residents to have to pay higher taxes. Would love to see them explain that.

Well, we'll just have to see if the WI residents are stupid enough to be duped by the Dems and the unions. If they are, it'll only last until the impending "Oh, crap! What have we done? We just screwed ourselves!" moment when they get their ever-skyrocketing tax bills.
No, we want the tax paying workers to take a hit in pay while Walker pays high salaries to his unqualified cronies riding the taxpayer gravy train!

Lobbyist's son to return to old job
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,820 posts, read 19,513,881 times
Reputation: 9619
unions have no business in the PUBLIC SECTOR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,820 posts, read 19,513,881 times
Reputation: 9619
actually unions are the epitome of fascism

fascism is also called corporatism

Corporatism, also known as corporativism, is a system of economic, political, or social organization that views a community as a body based upon organic social solidarity and functional distinction and roles among individuals. The term corporatism is based on the Latin word "corpus" meaning "body". Formal corporatist models are based upon the contract of corporate groups, such as agricultural, business, ethnic, labor, military, patronage, scientific, or religious affiliations, into a collective body

a corporation is a union...unions are a corporation...all is fascism

unions...usually backed by the globalist progressive fascist liberals have helped in some areas (child labor laws, etc) but their sole intent is to 'socialize' the united states, to either "nationalize" the entire country and its corporations (main stream socialist way), or to so over regulate the corporations (the fascist way)

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners by way of UNIONS. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically through unions. State ministries or unions, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.



""Fascism is a system in which the government leaves nominal ownership of the means of production in the hands of private individuals but exercises control by means of regulatory legislation and reaps most of the profit by means of heavy taxation. In effect, fascism is simply a more subtle form of government ownership than is socialism."" Mussolini





"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

- Norman Thomas, former U.S. Socialist Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,820 posts, read 19,513,881 times
Reputation: 9619
actually there is nothing wrong with PRIVATE sector unions...but the iISSUE AT HAND is the raping of the taxpayer by the PUBLIC sector unions that should be abolished

PUBLIC unions should not have barganing power...private unions sure..but not PUBLIC unions

the unions make it MADITORY to be a member of the union whether the worker want to be a member or not
the union makes it maditory to pay dues, even if you dont want to be a union member..you want the job, you will be union or you can go find something else

that is union crime

there should not be anytype of barganing for PUBLIC unions...private unions sure..but not publc unions

becaue PUBLIC unions are not supposed to have barganing...period

National Labor Relations Act ("Wagner Act"),Congress enacted the landmark Act in 1935 - the Magna Carta of the American labor movement. It excluded federal, state and local employees. It created the National Labor Relations Board to enforce the rights of labor.

even FDR said so

"""Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the government. All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations ... The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for ... officials ... to bind the employer ... The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives ...

"Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of government employees. Upon employees in the federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people ... This obligation is paramount ... A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent ... to prevent or obstruct ... Government ... Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government ... is unthinkable and intolerable."""...FDR 1937



and you want to know WHY it is a problem to have 'collective barganing' in the PUBLIC SECTOR............The problem is there is no REAL "collective bargaining." ......Public sector unions are a client of a Democratic bureaucracy that wants their vote. The taxpayer - the "employer" - isn't a player in the bargaining process......




this is why the liberals and the unions are protesting

“Without the mandatory dues from public employee unions, the democrat party is toast. Once this ball is rolling and taxpayers realize how the scam of public unions work, this wave will be unstoppable. Wi. dems better keep running.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 05:51 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,182,122 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Apparently the latest flap is that Walker hired one of his lobbyists son for an $81,000 job, his main qualification seems to be a High School diploma and two DUI arrests
Is this like Obama hiring a job czar that laid off tens of thousands of workers right before he was hired?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top