Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The share of the population that is working fell to its lowest level last year since women started entering the workforce in large numbers three decades ago, a USA TODAY analysis finds.
“No matter how wealthy you are, you have a problem if half the population is not working and depending on those who are,” says John Goodman, president of the conservative National Center for Policy Analysis. “Wherever you look, we’ve overpromised.”
This is just a really depressing number....and yet, the democrats would like to extend those UE benefits even further. Maybe if they got their way, even more people would give up their jobs and live on the dole.
I think putting it like this sounds harsher than it is, there is unemployment which is high, but only a little above half of the us population is actually part of the workforce, so its pretty normal to see almost half, depending on the other half... think children, housewives (househusbands) and elderly people.
What I think is important is how much of non-working population is children and how much is elderly people.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.