Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,941,526 times
Reputation: 5932

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
These smoking Nazis have finally gone off the deep end. In Iowa, Mercy Medical Center will test those people who apply for work there, and if they detect nicotine in their blood, they will refuse them employment.

Des Moines’ largest hospital plans to start testing prospective employees for the presence of nicotine to ensure that the company is not hiring smokers. Mercy Medical

Center-Des Moines said the new policy will take effect July 1. Any job applicant whose urine test comes up positive for nicotine will have to wait six months to apply again for a job at Mercy’s hospitals or clinics.

Mercy said it is the first Iowa hospital company to take the step.

“We recognize smoking or using tobacco products is not illegal,” Chief Human Resources Officer Robyn Wilkinson said in a press release. “However, our employees have an obligation to set a good example for the communities we serve. By implementing a nicotine-free hiring policy, Mercy will be expecting its employees to model the same healthy behaviors it encourages of its patients and their family members.”

Mercy Medical Center will no longer hire smokers

What tyranny is this? Smoking is not illegal, especially when you smoke or chew tobacco at home. whether a person is smoking the occasional cigar, pipe, cigarette or chews tobacco should be of no concern to an employer.

What's next, refusing employment to single people who sleep around, for fear they may contract VD? Or even worse, refusing employment to gays, since they score highest on the risk factor for contracting HIV AIDS?

What comes after that, refusing people employment for being over a certain weight, or for eating too much red meat, or pork?
This not the first time this issue has come up and I have the felling the SC will end getting involved and will shootdown such BS as illegal.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
78 posts, read 103,069 times
Reputation: 71
Within 5 years, they'll just skip straight to testing for adrenaline.

"Your urine looks a little cloudy there Mr. Down, is the Mercy Medical Center family not fun enough for you?".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:06 PM
 
1,811 posts, read 1,210,451 times
Reputation: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
These smoking Nazis have finally gone off the deep end. In Iowa, Mercy Medical Center will test those people who apply for work there, and if they detect nicotine in their blood, they will refuse them employment.

Des Moines’ largest hospital plans to start testing prospective employees for the presence of nicotine to ensure that the company is not hiring smokers. Mercy Medical

Center-Des Moines said the new policy will take effect July 1. Any job applicant whose urine test comes up positive for nicotine will have to wait six months to apply again for a job at Mercy’s hospitals or clinics.

Mercy said it is the first Iowa hospital company to take the step.

“We recognize smoking or using tobacco products is not illegal,” Chief Human Resources Officer Robyn Wilkinson said in a press release. “However, our employees have an obligation to set a good example for the communities we serve. By implementing a nicotine-free hiring policy, Mercy will be expecting its employees to model the same healthy behaviors it encourages of its patients and their family members.”

Mercy Medical Center will no longer hire smokers

What tyranny is this? Smoking is not illegal, especially when you smoke or chew tobacco at home. whether a person is smoking the occasional cigar, pipe, cigarette or chews tobacco should be of no concern to an employer.

What's next, refusing employment to single people who sleep around, for fear they may contract VD? Or even worse, refusing employment to gays, since they score highest on the risk factor for contracting HIV AIDS?

What comes after that, refusing people employment for being over a certain weight, or for eating too much red meat, or pork?
If an employer doesn't want nicotine in their workplace, that is their call. It is well past time for the Skanks of the world to realize that this world doesn't exist to be your ashtray or your air filter. That your filthy stench needs to be kept to your filthy stinking selves, and not inflicted on normal people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:09 PM
 
6,734 posts, read 9,342,697 times
Reputation: 1857
As long we have employer provided health care in this country, I will never hire a smoker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:09 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,455,215 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffington View Post
If an employer doesn't want nicotine in their workplace, that is their call. It is well past time for the Skanks of the world to realize that this world doesn't exist to be your ashtray or your air filter. That your filthy stench needs to be kept to your filthy stinking selves, and not inflicted on normal people.
So can we also reject people who bring in stinky food or don't bath properly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
78 posts, read 103,069 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffington View Post
If an employer doesn't want nicotine in their workplace, that is their call. It is well past time for the Skanks of the world to realize that this world doesn't exist to be your ashtray or your air filter. That your filthy stench needs to be kept to your filthy stinking selves, and not inflicted on normal people.
Are you just spouting off an irrelevant point or does your reading comprehension need a little work? This isn't about not allowing smoking in the workplace (that's kind of old news), it's about smoking in the privacy of your home/on your own time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffington View Post
If an employer doesn't want nicotine in their workplace, that is their call. It is well past time for the Skanks of the world to realize that this world doesn't exist to be your ashtray or your air filter. That your filthy stench needs to be kept to your filthy stinking selves, and not inflicted on normal people.
But..only for some people, not for all jeffington.
Doctors are exempt..the very people that you say have "that filthy stench".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Somewhere gray and damp, close to the West Coast
20,955 posts, read 5,546,892 times
Reputation: 8559
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffington View Post
If an employer doesn't want nicotine in their workplace, that is their call. It is well past time for the Skanks of the world to realize that this world doesn't exist to be your ashtray or your air filter. That your filthy stench needs to be kept to your filthy stinking selves, and not inflicted on normal people.
Hi Jeffie! Haven't insulted me in a while, have you? Well, it's good to know you're keeping your vile little mouth in practice.

We're laughing, Jeffie. Laughing, laughing, laughing at you. Keep that picture in your head when you try to sleep at night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,744,889 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Floyd View Post
This is sort of the Ron Paul / private property rights issue isn't it? Do we ask for government involvement or do we boycott businesses when we don't agree with their policies?

I would choose the second action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,744,889 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffington View Post
If an employer doesn't want nicotine in their workplace, that is their call. It is well past time for the Skanks of the world to realize that this world doesn't exist to be your ashtray or your air filter. That your filthy stench needs to be kept to your filthy stinking selves, and not inflicted on normal people.

Normal people ???? Is that defined as anyone who does what you do?????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top