Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What I don't understand is how on one hand, Texans are supposedly so against government intervention yet on the other hand, they are all for laws that hamper the ability of our elected officials to decide what should and should not go to trial. Talk about the ultimate government intervention.
How is this hampering the ability of elected officials to decide what should and shouldn't go to trial? The person bringing the suit simply has to pay all court costs if they lose at trial, correct? Maybe I'm not reading this right...
how is this hampering the ability of elected officials to decide what should and shouldn't go to trial? The person bringing the suit simply has to pay all court costs if they lose at trial, correct? Maybe i'm not reading this right...
Not on main street. The sentiments coming even from law firms is that justice is for sale and this only cements it in place. I expect the fruit yield will be less court cases and more unsolved incidents of retaliation. I guess this is a way around ceding. Water down the law until the constitution is null and void.
Not on main street. The sentiments coming even from law firms is that justice is for sale and this only cements it in place. I expect the fruit yield will be less court cases and more unsolved incidents of retaliation. I guess this is a way around ceding. Water down the law until the constitution is null and void.
LOL LOL LOL.It's great news for Main Street and Small Businesses
Trial lawyer hated this bill because less trials means less money for them
Don't mess with Texas
Trial lawyers won't be out of business silly. They already know their business is all about being the highest bidder for the judges election cycle. Sometimes when you 'win' you've actually lost. You'll see.
What I don't understand is how on one hand, Texans are supposedly so against government intervention yet on the other hand, they are all for laws that hamper the ability of our elected officials to decide what should and should not go to trial. Talk about the ultimate government intervention.
I suggest you read both sides and all perspectives before you say this is a wonderful idea. It is, as long as you can afford to lose body parts and time off of work due to someone else's gross negligence.
Gross negligence would be a slam dunk, with no chance of losing. What's you feel concern?
What I don't understand is how on one hand, Texans are supposedly so against government intervention yet on the other hand, they are all for laws that hamper the ability of our elected officials to decide what should and should not go to trial. Talk about the ultimate government intervention.
Huh? Elected officials should decide what should or shouldn't go to trial? Ummmm no. This is the opposite of government intervention. This encourages personal responsibility.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
