Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I mean this to be a bit funny, but it also touches on some liberal/conservative issues. I constantly see conservative posters on here attacking both San Fransisco and Dearborn, albeit for very different reasons.
So here's my question to conservatives: Which is the lesser of two evils? If you had to move to the stereotyped version of one or the other, which would it be? Who would you rather have as your neighbors: Godless gender and sexual misfits, or freedom-hating Muslim shariasts?
I mean this to be a bit funny, but it also touches on some liberal/conservative issues. I constantly see conservative posters on here attacking both San Fransisco and Dearborn, albeit for very different reasons.
So here's my question to conservatives: Which is the lesser of two evils? If you had to move to the stereotyped version of one or the other, which would it be? Who would you rather have as your neighbors: Godless gender and sexual misfits, or freedom-hating Muslim shariasts?
I live within ten miles of East Dearborn now so it's a no-brainer.
Keep in mind, it's not Dearborn. It's East Dearborn.
West Dearborn is still largely whitebread America with a few blacks here and there for good measure.
It's only when you get east of the Southfield that the demographics change.
I mean this to be a bit funny, but it also touches on some liberal/conservative issues. I constantly see conservative posters on here attacking both San Fransisco and Dearborn, albeit for very different reasons.
So here's my question to conservatives: Which is the lesser of two evils? If you had to move to the stereotyped version of one or the other, which would it be? Who would you rather have as your neighbors: Godless gender and sexual misfits, or freedom-hating Muslim shariasts?
Given that hatred of homosexuals combined with a general hypocritical disdain for sexual freedoms is one of the reasons why I hate jihadis and critical of Islam is general, I'd pick San Francisco in a heartbeat.
No way I ever want to endure any more midwestern winters.
But then again... I can't stand earthquakes.
Good question... I have to decide which is worse - freezing my tuchus off or those unpredictable California wake-up calls.
Think of it this way... we experience MAYBE one "noticeable" earthquake annually, if that. How often does the Midwest experience harsh winters? Hmmmmm.
P.S. You misspelled our city name, hammertime... it's San Francisco. And of course I didn't vote in the poll, given that I'm a liberal who already lives in the Bay Area - definitely not your intended audience, LOL. Interesting question, though!
I'd vote San Francisco. However, if SF were replaced with Berkeley then I'd struggle to decide between Dearbornistan and a city that actively opposes our nation and it's military.
San Francisco. I already live amongst crackpot liberals and have learned how to deal with them just fine. The weather would be the biggest factor for me.
At least San Francisco has the ocean breeze to carry the stench away.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And of course I didn't vote in the poll, given that I'm a liberal who already lives in the Bay Area - definitely not your intended audience, LOL. Interesting question, though!
