Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Judicial reform options
Appointed by the state's governor/state government 5 19.23%
Appointed via a non partisan panel 10 38.46%
Elected 11 42.31%
I don't care 0 0%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2011, 02:36 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,108,790 times
Reputation: 7366

Advertisements

In most of the world judges are appointed via various means but in the United States, judges are elected in 33 out of 50 states and a movement is underway to finally abolish the practice of electing judges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2011, 02:38 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,108,790 times
Reputation: 7366
I selected appointed by a non partisan panel.

Judges here in New York are elected and (not surprisingly) the system is rife with corruption, afterall money talks. I have personally heard many horror stories of judges who refused to excuse themselves from cases, and/or who made rulings based on campaign donations. I would like to see elected judges abolished in all 50 states, Washington DC, and the 5 US territories.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2011, 02:40 PM
 
13,692 posts, read 9,009,247 times
Reputation: 10409
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIHS2006 View Post
I selected appointed by a non partisan panel.

Judges here in New York are elected and (not surprisingly) the system is rife with corruption, afterall money talks. I have personally heard many horror stories of judges who refused to excuse themselves from cases, and/or who made rulings based on campaign donations. I would like to see elected judges abolished in all 50 states, Washington DC, and the 5 US territories.
I too voted for non-partisian panel.

Your paragraph applies here: simply substitute "Texas" for "New York".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2011, 02:42 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,858,535 times
Reputation: 9283
There is NO SUCH THING as non-partisan...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2011, 02:47 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
I think that it depends. Every state has a different system, and I don't think a one-size fits all approach works. For instance, if a judge's role in county government is more political than judicial, then it makes sense for that judge to be elected. If a judge is making decisions about road improvements and budget expenditures, I think it's appropriate for that judge to be elected and answerable to the local citizenry. If a judge's role is more judicial than political, I think that in those cases that judge should be appointed, because justice in the hands of the people isn't always justice, sometimes it's judgment without the weight of the law behind it. A judge making judicial decisions should not be swayed by public opinion, nor have to consider an electoral future that might corrupt his legal judgment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2011, 03:37 PM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,003,195 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIHS2006 View Post
In most of the world judges are appointed via various means but in the United States, judges are elected in 33 out of 50 states and a movement is underway to finally abolish the practice of electing judges.
I think that it's very sad that judges can risk their re-elections based on court decisions that are not popular with the public. Just look at what happened in Iowa when the Supreme Court justices made the decision that banning gay marriages was unconstitutional. The hate mobs came out in full force to evict them from office. Justice should not be decided by mob rule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2011, 04:06 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,108,790 times
Reputation: 7366
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehotex View Post
I think that it's very sad that judges can risk their re-elections based on court decisions that are not popular with the public. Just look at what happened in Iowa when the Supreme Court justices made the decision that banning gay marriages was unconstitutional. The hate mobs came out in full force to evict them from office. Justice should not be decided by mob rule.
Agreed entirely, elected judges translates to a tyranny of the majority. That's another of the many reasons why I would like to see judicial elections ended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2011, 04:12 PM
 
Location: SouthCentral Texas
3,854 posts, read 4,836,467 times
Reputation: 960
Whether elected or appointed, I think they should at least have a law degree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2011, 09:16 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,108,790 times
Reputation: 7366
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1751texan View Post
Whether elected or appointed, I think they should at least have a law degree.
I did some research on this and I was completely shocked to discover that there are many states where judges are not required to have a law degree!

If we require an elected sheriff to be POST certified then we sure as heck should required all judges, elected or appointed, to have a law degree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2011, 09:51 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,447,268 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIHS2006 View Post
I did some research on this and I was completely shocked to discover that there are many states where judges are not required to have a law degree!

If we require an elected sheriff to be POST certified then we sure as heck should required all judges, elected or appointed, to have a law degree.

You have got to be kidding, i would only hope that each State made sure the judges were required to have a law degree!

Let me guess which States does allow judges to not have to have a law degree, i would like to know. Calif one of them.
I would at least hope the judges elected, or by appointment, would have to have a law degree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top