Quote:
Originally Posted by billydaman
The amount of money stolen is irrelevant. One guy committed a violent crime, i.e. armed robbery the other guy ripped some people off. I do agree the armed robber got too much time, if the story is accurate but I do believe in most jurisdictions armed robbery has minimum of 10-15 years so its sad but the reality is, if you need $100 dont commit an armed robbery, just go steal a tv from wal mart.
|
This was a bs thread started years ago. The armed robbery was committed in 2007. The CEO article doesn't even come up any more. Likely different states, different laws, etc. OP pulled a random worst punishment to try to make his point.