Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Barack Obama says, "I'm not a Supreme Court Justice so I'm not goig to put on my Constitutional law professor hat here. Do I think that our actions in any way violate the War Powers Resolution? The answer is no. So I don't even have to get to the Constitutional question. ...... The Constitution is very clear you don't go to war without a declaration. ... He can't go to war by talking to the United Nations and NATO and refusing to talk to the Congress. (http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011070313965/us/politics-and-economics/ron-paul-obama-violated-war-powers-resolution.html?utm_source=Right+Side+News&utm_cam paign=c8e1ca1ccc-daily-rss-newsletter&utm_medium=email - broken link)
I'm beginning to like Ron Paul more and more. He would school the man-child in a debate on the constitution.
Indeed. This is exactly why the far left and the MSM do their best to minimize Paul's exposure. A POTUS who actually adhered to and upheld the Constitution of the United States of America would be a detriment to the global Progressive agenda. The warmongers and banksters can't have the Constitution remain intact so they put in their puppets instead. Obama is one in a long line. Paul is a threat because he cannot be bought.
Only Republican presidents can only violate the war powers resolution.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.