Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wouldn't want to shake his hand probably started with hand and just progressed down the line of fun ways to stimulate your prostate.
Anal sex isn't normal sex.
You might try to keep up with the discussion.
Shorebaby is arguing that ANY sex that is engaged in without the goal of reproduction is unnatural. And further asserting that this is a mainstream opinion. Is that an assertion you agree with?
You do know that prostitution is widely considered as 'the worlds oldest profession'... Why would people pay for sex if it's only used for reproduction?
In theological circles sure.....but not historically.
Shorebaby is arguing that ANY sex that is engaged in without the goal of reproduction is unnatural. And further asserting that this is a mainstream opinion. Is that an assertion you agree with?
Or alternately DC is arguing that the evolutionary reason for sex is for any number of reasons ( but has failed to support any).
Why? The simple fact that contraceptives are so widely used is evidence that your opinion that any sex without the goal of reproduction is unnatural is not an opinion widely shared. I don't think that people using contraceptives think that their sexual behavior is unnatural.
Shorebaby is arguing that ANY sex that is engaged in without the goal of reproduction is unnatural. And further asserting that this is a mainstream opinion. Is that an assertion you agree with?
I don't believe that a male and female need to have procreation in mind every time they have sex - it is however the product of normal sex.
Or alternately DC is arguing that the evolutionary reason for sex is for any number of reasons ( but has failed to support any).
No, DC is arguing that sex engaged in for reasons besides reproduction is natural. And I've supported my argument. All you can do is repeat your mantra, sex is for reproduction, sex is for reproduction, sex is for reproduction. And in doing so, you ignore the numerous social constructs that sexual behavior support. Social constructs on the surface may seem artificial, but the human behavior of creating social constructs is a natural human behavior. Therefore, sex used in social constructs is a natural human behavior. And nature has made sex pleasurable for humans, very pleasurable actually, so sex for pleasure is also perfectly natural. And so say the majority of people, not your "theological" (was that an attempt to avoid "religious" on your part?) minority.
I don't believe that a male and female need to have procreation in mind every time they have sex - it is however the product of normal sex.
So if I am infertile, any sex I have is "not normal"? How so? The penis still goes into my vagina doesn't it? I still have an orgasm, hopefully, he has an orgasm, as well. What's not normal?
she is an idiot to say the Bible take presidence over man. Who do you think wrote the Bible,?
Also it is over 2000 years old, I am sure it has been, **cough, cough** modified from time to time....and anyone that doesn't believe that is silly.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ya haven't been following the thread have ya.
