Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-16-2011, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585

Advertisements

Really? Oh, I get it, Court in Houston Texas.

BP executives get U.S. investor lawsuit dismissed | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2011, 04:43 PM
 
760 posts, read 685,816 times
Reputation: 457
Quote:
"English law governs this dispute and will determine whether the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and harmed BP in the process," wrote U.S. District Judge Keith Ellison.
Last I checked, it was our beaches the oil rolled up on.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 37,012,211 times
Reputation: 15560
Wonder if that jackass of a judge heard about this;
Tropical Storm Lee exposes old oil from BP spill in Gulf » Naples Daily News Mobile
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 06:01 PM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Really? Oh, I get it, Court in Houston Texas.

BP executives get U.S. investor lawsuit dismissed | Reuters
In your rush to throw out your insult on Texas, without doing any research, only shows you don't care about the facts.

Did you even bother read your own link?

"A federal court in Houston said it was more appropriate that investors file their lawsuit in the United Kingdom because the company is based in London."English law governs this dispute and will determine whether the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and harmed BP in the process," wrote U.S. District Judge Keith Ellison."


The judge who made the ruling is NOT from Texas. It just so happens that is where the District Court is located.

Strike 1 against you.

Keith P. Ellison (born 1950 in New Orleans, Louisiana) is a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. His chambers are in Houston, Texas.
Educated first at Harvard College, he was awarded a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford where he studied at Magdalen College before earning his Juris Doctor from Yale Law School.
After graduating from Yale, he clerked for Judge J. Skelly Wright on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He then clerked for Justice Harry Blackmun on the Supreme Court during the October 1977 term before entering private practice in Houston.
In 1999, he was nominated by Bill Clinton to a vacant seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate. He received his commission on July 7, 1999. His chambers were in Laredo, Texas until 2005 when his duty station transferred to Houston.
Keith P. Ellison - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WOW, a Clinton appointee.
He is not a Texas judge so your insult on Texas has no validity.

Strike 2 against you.

The judge went Haaawvard, was a Rhodes scholar and went to Yale.

This is just the education the left constantly brags about.

Strike 3, your out!

Post. Epic fail
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 06:25 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,854,052 times
Reputation: 20030
some of you might want to actually READ the whole article;

Quote:
The U.S. court could reassert jurisdiction if the UK courts refuse to take the case, the ruling said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2011, 03:49 AM
 
20,343 posts, read 19,934,560 times
Reputation: 13460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
In your rush to throw out your insult on Texas, without doing any research, only shows you don't care about the facts.

Did you even bother read your own link?

"A federal court in Houston said it was more appropriate that investors file their lawsuit in the United Kingdom because the company is based in London."English law governs this dispute and will determine whether the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and harmed BP in the process," wrote U.S. District Judge Keith Ellison."


The judge who made the ruling is NOT from Texas. It just so happens that is where the District Court is located.

Strike 1 against you.

Keith P. Ellison (born 1950 in New Orleans, Louisiana) is a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. His chambers are in Houston, Texas.
Educated first at Harvard College, he was awarded a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford where he studied at Magdalen College before earning his Juris Doctor from Yale Law School.
After graduating from Yale, he clerked for Judge J. Skelly Wright on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He then clerked for Justice Harry Blackmun on the Supreme Court during the October 1977 term before entering private practice in Houston.
In 1999, he was nominated by Bill Clinton to a vacant seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate. He received his commission on July 7, 1999. His chambers were in Laredo, Texas until 2005 when his duty station transferred to Houston.
Keith P. Ellison - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WOW, a Clinton appointee.
He is not a Texas judge so your insult on Texas has no validity.

Strike 2 against you.

The judge went Haaawvard, was a Rhodes scholar and went to Yale.

This is just the education the left constantly brags about.

Strike 3, your out!

Post. Epic fail
Way to buzzkill a perfectly good anti-Texas rant

Now we can't throw in Perry, Bush, Cheney, Halliburton hell, even Palin!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2011, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,280,580 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
In your rush to throw out your insult on Texas, without doing any research, only shows you don't care about the facts.

Did you even bother read your own link?

"A federal court in Houston said it was more appropriate that investors file their lawsuit in the United Kingdom because the company is based in London."English law governs this dispute and will determine whether the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and harmed BP in the process," wrote U.S. District Judge Keith Ellison."


The judge who made the ruling is NOT from Texas. It just so happens that is where the District Court is located.

Strike 1 against you.

Keith P. Ellison (born 1950 in New Orleans, Louisiana) is a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. His chambers are in Houston, Texas.
Educated first at Harvard College, he was awarded a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford where he studied at Magdalen College before earning his Juris Doctor from Yale Law School.
After graduating from Yale, he clerked for Judge J. Skelly Wright on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He then clerked for Justice Harry Blackmun on the Supreme Court during the October 1977 term before entering private practice in Houston.
In 1999, he was nominated by Bill Clinton to a vacant seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate. He received his commission on July 7, 1999. His chambers were in Laredo, Texas until 2005 when his duty station transferred to Houston.
Keith P. Ellison - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WOW, a Clinton appointee.
He is not a Texas judge so your insult on Texas has no validity.

Strike 2 against you.

The judge went Haaawvard, was a Rhodes scholar and went to Yale.

This is just the education the left constantly brags about.

Strike 3, your out!

Post. Epic fail
Nice job of research that proves too much about what old bob says. I was thinking about doing some of that since I couldn't see what he was so excited about other than the words about Texas.

You deserve a rep point but I can't give you one now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2011, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, FL
1,695 posts, read 3,045,636 times
Reputation: 1143
Yes - makes sense.
The Shareholders Derivative suit should be brought in the UK.

Other suits involving BP are correctly pending in US Courts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2011, 03:47 PM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coachgns View Post
Yes - makes sense.
The Shareholders Derivative suit should be brought in the UK.

Other suits involving BP are correctly pending in US Courts.
The OP's intent was to throw a slur against Texas because that is where Bush and Perry are from. He could care less about anything else as can be seen by his comments and without reading his own link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top