Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The libs are already getting the anger machine geared up after the loss of the white house and senate in 2012.
Libs are alot happier when they have something to complain about. So it will be a win-win situation, in which the nation gets some direction toward fiscal responsibility and the libs can be happy again while protesting and complaining.
Counting chickens before they hatch is foolish, but considering the source I would say it is par for the course. As for whining, the righties have shown they can take it to a entirely new level, more can be expected from them after 2012.
Casper
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away called Germany
4,300 posts, read 4,408,773 times
Reputation: 2394
There is the new slogan for the Democratic Party (based on this article): Vote Democrat! We may suck, but at least we don't suck as bad as The Republicans!
There is the new slogan for the Democratic Party (based on this article): Vote Democrat! We may suck, but at least we don't suck as bad as The Republicans!
After eight years of Clintonian double-speak, you'll excuse me for losing interest in this one early on.
What sort of illiterate retard fails to see the end of the statement contradicts the beginning in such a way that one assertion nullifies another?
"But both parties are not rotten in quite the same way. The Democrats have their share of machine politicians, careerists, corporate bagmen, egomaniacs and kooks. Nothing, however, quite matches the modern GOP."
"Way" or degree?
The first sentence says "same way", but the obvious meaning is degree. In fact, nothing in the context of this paragraph indicates a different type of corruption, as was promised by "not rotten in quite the same way".
But both parties are not rotten in quite the same way.
Nothing, however, quite matches the modern GOP
If both parties, as the author asserts, are "not rotten in quite the same way", why would we expect Democrat's "machine politicians, careerists, corporate bagmen, egomaniacs and kooks" to match "the modern GOP"?
Either the author is an extremely poor writer, or he is deliberately attempting to mix meanings such that the lazy reader is carried away by tag lines and buzz words to a place where tone takes the place of fact.
What exactly is your point? He probably meant both way and degree... Since you will find each possible way among at least one member of each party, theoretically it is all about degree. However, since some ways are more dominant (i.e. higher degree) with one party than the other, the various degrees of all the individual ways give the general picture of different ways.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Lunacy of the GOP - From an Insider
