Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-27-2011, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by actonbell View Post
But...haven't you heard? Record snow..or lack of snow...is attributable to global warming?

Same with floods/drought.

Same with hot/cold.

EVERYTHING is now blamed on global warming.

Here's the pull quote from BEST;

Quote:
“The human component of global warming may be somewhat overestimated.”
I'm thinking most didn't even read the study, just followed the "headline" like good little sheep.

BEST confirms what we've all known - 70% of surface stations are suspect because of siting and are OUT of compliance with government standards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2011, 07:23 AM
 
488 posts, read 554,784 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by actonbell View Post
And?

Summer of 2011 was hottest on record for areas of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, New Mexico...

Record Heat of 2011 - weather.com

Perhaps local aberrations are not good evidence for or against either side?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildbill80 View Post
And?

Summer of 2011 was hottest on record for areas of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, New Mexico...

Record Heat of 2011 - weather.com

Perhaps local aberrations are not good evidence for or against either side?
Wow. A couple dozen cities broke some heat records.....in summer.

How many cities are in the US?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 07:42 AM
 
54 posts, read 112,000 times
Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildbill80 View Post
Perhaps local aberrations are not good evidence for or against either side?
Of course it's not. The amount of ignorance and politically-charged rhetoric I've been reading in this thread is pretty tremendous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 07:44 AM
 
15,089 posts, read 8,631,560 times
Reputation: 7431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turboblocke View Post
From your link GnT:

You might be convinced that you can measure global temperature from data taken from one island, but most people wouldn't be able to make that leap of faith.


Now how much are you prepared to pay for the Eiffel tower? I can get you a good deal.
I don't know what this business of "one Island" means ... the decline in global temperature from the latter part of the 1990's to 2010 has been measured by Satellite imaging, rather than earth based measuring stations.

Furthermore, there are nuances in the English language and in critical analysis that seem to be escaping your notice. You really can have a net temperature increase of .5 during the course of the 20th century as measured against some other point in time such as the 18th and 19th century, while ALSO experiencing a decline in temperature between 1998-2010. These are not contradictory facts.

The point here is WHERE do you start the point of comparison to show an "unprecedented" global warming-climate change event occurring, and how your choice of where to start that measurement might alter the conclusion.

After the Medieval Warm Period which occurred roughly between 800-1200, the period between 1300-1800 marked the period known as the "Little Ice Age" when temperatures dropped dramatically. The lowest points being between 1600-1800. Since that time, temperatures have been rising, with slight fluctuations up and down if you analyze them decade to decade. So if you chart the temperature record starting at the peak of the Warm period, say 1150 and end at 2010, the chart will show NOTHING unusual about the 20th century temperatures, since current temperatures show no anomaly when compared to the Peak Warm period, which was slightly warmer than it is today.

BUT ... if you want to be DECEPTIVE and convince people there is a Global Warming Disaster occurring, you can leave out the Medieval Warm Period, and start your comparison chart at the 1700 (peak cold of the little ice age) time line moving forward, which will show a net increase in temperatures in each subsequent century. But even doing this doesn't negate the fact that warming occurred in the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries, which were Pre-Industrial Revolution times ... and therefore, this warming was OBVIOUSLY not due to man made CO2.

So, no matter how you slice it, dice it, spin it ..... the only leap of faith required here is to believe that the earth's climate system changed how it had always functioned for thousands of years, starting around the 1940's.

The notion is preposterous, and the logic necessary to understand this is very basic level intelligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 07:54 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,536 posts, read 37,136,097 times
Reputation: 14000
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Do you understand the planet has possibly warmed a 1/2 degree over the last 150 years (out of 6 billion) and has been flat over the last decade, at least?

No where in the BEST report does it say the miniscule warming that has occurred is man made.

I wonder if you know Co2 is the life blood of the planet.

You actually believe that a 1/2 degree over 150 years (the amount of time HUMANS have been measuring the temperature - and not very well at that) is abnormal, unnatural, unprecedented?
Uh, that is 1.4 degrees in the last 100 years....No need to lie about it.

We don’t have to accept the authority of the NAS. Just look at the latest evidence, which has been making headlines in the popular media over the past months. Not only is the land surface of the earth getting warmer, the seas are getting warmer especially at the poles, which is why the polar ice caps are melting rapidly.

Scientists from the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) report that over the past 50 years more than 13 000 sq km of sea ice in the Antarctic Peninsula has been lost. Melting in the Antarctic Peninsula removes sea ice that held back the movement of glaciers. As a result, glaciers flow into the ocean up to 6 times faster than before. West Antarctica is also affected where the warmer seawater appears to be eroding the ice from below. Global Warming Is Happening
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 08:03 AM
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,593,334 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildbill80 View Post
And?

Summer of 2011 was hottest on record for areas of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, New Mexico...

Record Heat of 2011 - weather.com

Perhaps local aberrations are not good evidence for or against either side?
Good point. And we're still dry in East Texas, make me wonder who turned off the water spiket.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 08:09 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyNTexas View Post
The notion is preposterous, and the logic necessary to understand this is very basic level intelligence.
Now who is a fella ta believe, a scientist funded by two ultra rich billionaires dedicated to debunking human caused global warming who changes his mind or an anonymous climate change denier on an internet forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 08:15 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,478,433 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by actonbell View Post
Good point. And we're still dry in East Texas, make me wonder who turned off the water spiket.
A Texas Climatologist (supposedly the "state" climatologist) who is not a global warming skeptic how much of the heat wave was due to global warming.

john n-g | Climate Abyss | a Chron.com blog

I thought this long but interesting. His answer was about 1/4 of the excess heat was due to global warming, the rest natural.

He also says that Texas is entering a dry period that may last til 2020.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 08:15 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Uh, that is 1.4 degrees in the last 100 years....No need to lie about it.

Yeah, maybe when you add the "padding" the "scientists" inject because they are missing data. 1/2 degree over 150 years.

We don’t have to accept the authority of the NAS. Just look at the latest evidence, which has been making headlines in the popular media over the past months. Not only is the land surface of the earth getting warmer, the seas are getting warmer especially at the poles, which is why the polar ice caps are melting rapidly.

Ah gawds!! At the very least, TRY to get the basic facts right. Where is the missing heat?

The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat : NPR

Quote:
The buoys can dive 3,000 feet down and measure ocean temperature. Since the system was fully deployed in 2003, it has recorded no warming of the global oceans.
Why Antarctic Sea Ice Is Growing in a Warmer World

Quote:
Why Antarctic Sea Ice Is Growing in a Warmer World
Yeah, except the world is not warming.

Oh please, just look at this - take note however, the "summer" has just recently ended;


Polar Sea Ice Cap and Snow - Cryosphere Today

DAVID ROSE: The mini ice age starts here | Mail Online

Quote:
According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and even the most committed global warming activists do not dispute this.
I think your problem is you haven't CHECKED to see if the predictions of the AGWarmists came true or not. For your information, they didn't.

You know, I put up a thread that shows the arctic virtually ice free...back in the 20,30,40,50. I don't suppose you took note of that?

I imagine this scared the believers half to death;

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/06/...5191214620247/

Quote:
Ice expected tp disappear from North Pole
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08...c_ice_mystery/

2008 article. Was supposed to disappear that year. In case you missed it, that didn't happen, hasn't happened....recently.

However, I'm SURE some time in this planet's distant past, it happened...over and over again.

Last edited by sanrene; 10-27-2011 at 08:42 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top