Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
According to you and many on here, Obama is worthless.
I guess it's hard to admit it when a publication sees your guy as even more worthless.
How does that at all respond to the statement made?
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
You do realize that citing GQ as if it's a source of meanigful political information is really scraping the bottom of the barrel, even for die-hard Obama bashers, right?
BTW, nice to see that even in the dubious source of GQ that the orange snurf is holding up his end of the bargain
Haha.. YOU used them as a source to sight how the Speaker of the House was less influential than Obama, but now all of a sudden you dont like the source you JUST USED
You do realize that the speaker of the house is SUPPOSED to be less influental than the president, right?
So, this was the least influential list of truly influential people???
The Speaker of the House isn't SUPPOSED to be one of the least influential people in America, is he? That position should carry "some" influence, shouldn't it?
The GQ article was a lame attempt at HUMOR, people. It wasn't intended to be taken seriously. It was meant to make people laugh, and to provoke some people.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.